ÐHwww.dakotavoice.com/2007/04/how-pro-abortionists-live-with.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2007/04/how-pro-abortionists-live-with.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\sck.suuxå\IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈHm ®LOKtext/htmlUTF-8gzip (à®LÿÿÿÿJ}/yWed, 31 Dec 2008 22:49:25 GMT"a5db0704-bddd-435c-94b8-20d6f86f7df6"yMozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *â\Iÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ*l®L Dakota Voice: How Pro-Abortionists Live With Themselves

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Friday, April 20, 2007

How Pro-Abortionists Live With Themselves

David Limbaugh's latest column explains the inconsistency of abortion with regard to "rights," but also explains how pro-aborts manage to live with this inconsistency:

One has to scratch one's head to think of any other liberty that is so absolute that it permits no restrictions. We don't think that way regarding other liberties.

For example, would anyone seriously argue that my right to swing my fist entitles me to commit battery on another person? Does our right to sexual liberty entitle us to rape? Why do the radical pro-abortionists regard any restriction on abortion, which doesn't just harm another person, but kills him or her, an impermissible encroachment on a woman's liberty?

The only way it is logically possible to couch the abortion debate in terms of a woman's right to her own autonomy is if we accept the premise that the second party in the equation, the unborn, is not a party at all, but a meaningless mass of tissue bereft of human dignity. Sadly for the pro-aborts, it is increasingly clear from any perspective we choose to examine it: scientific, spiritual or otherwise, that the unborn is a human life. If the pro-aborts were not aware of the humanness of the unborn, they wouldn't grudgingly pretend to strive to make abortion "safe, legal and rare." There is no moral imperative to protect a human-less mass of tissue.


0 comments:

 
Clicky Web Analytics