ÐHwww.dakotavoice.com/2008/10/media-breathless-over-charges-obama.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2008/10/media-breathless-over-charges-obama.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\s59c.b5fx‰^IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈø¿ejcOKtext/htmlUTF-8gzip (BjcÿÿÿÿJ}/yFri, 02 Jan 2009 08:31:05 GMT"a5083d20-e8a9-49f8-b5f1-f029e5fff544"ª-Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *‡^Iÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿsjc Dakota Voice: Media Breathless over Charges Obama Pals Around With Terrorists

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Sunday, October 05, 2008

Media Breathless over Charges Obama Pals Around With Terrorists

Watch the video below.

Don't you just love this, perhaps the closest that the "mainstream" media can actually report on information damaging to Barack Obama?

It's damning to him and his credibility...yet the "mainstream" media attempts to smear someone else with Obama's moral failure.

The CNN reporter says the "fiery words" heard on the campaign trail are "getting worse." Ooooooooooh! Then he repeats the quote of Sarah Palin stating today:

"Our opponent though is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough that he is palling around with terrorists who would target their own country"

The reporter says it somewhat breathlessly, as if it's the most far fetched thing you could possibly imagine (and perhaps it would be, if it wasn't true).

He also calls it "a very strong assertion" as if to say "Wow, I don't know if I'da said that. She'd better be able to prove that." As if the proof of it's accuracy wasn't already well documented.


And the person who posted this on YouTube is apparently a big-time Koolaid drinker, because this was their description:
PALIN HATES THIS COUNTRY- THIS IS VERY PLAN TO SEE,,, WHAT TYPE OF ANIMAL TALKS ABOUT ANOTHER AMERICAN LIKE THIS.. VOTE THE REPUBLICANS OUT OF OFFICE,,, ENOUGH OF THEIR HATE AND LIES

So NOT the person who set off bombs in the U.S. Capitol, Pentagon and other government buildings and remains to this day unrepentant for those acts...not the person who has worked with this terrorist on multiple occasions and projects and got his political start at a party at this terrorist's house...not them, but the person who mentions it is the evil animal.

Only in the liberal fantasy world could this happen!

Answer this question honestly. If someone lived in your area who had bombed the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon, several post offices and other buildings...and on September 11, 2001 they had said "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough."

QUESTION: Would you work for an organization they founded and serve on the board of that organization with them? Would you let this person hold a campaign fundraiser for you at their house and attend it?

Would you work with and associate with Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh?

If you wouldn't, why would you support a presidential candidate who would associate with a domestic terrorist?

And if you would, what kind of American are you?


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

When will Americans stop being so ignorant? McCain had and probably still has ties with radicals. Obama was playing with his little balls and trucks when this man was commiting his violent acts. Obama met him years and years later at a charity event. The man decided to take the second chance that was given to him and do something better with his life and that's when he met Obama. If you're not a total idiot, please explain what's wrong with that.

Bob Ellis said...

I'd be curious to know what terrorists John McCain has worked with in the past.

Let me make the rest of your query as plain as I can:

1. Ayers committed terrorist acts against Americans and American institutions

2. Ayers has never expressed any regret or remorse; in fact, he stated on 911 that "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough."

3. Obama has worked closely with Ayers on various projects, including serving on the board of an organization Ayers founded, and attended a meet-and-greet Ayers threw for him at Ayers' house to launch Obama's campaign.

Given these or similar facts, would you associate with someone who had bombed the U.S. Capitol, the Pentagon and other buildings?

Would you vote for someone who would associate with such an unrepentant terrorist?

There are people who were playing with toys when Timothy McVeigh bombed the Oklahoma City federal building, who will now be voting; for all I know, you could be one of them.

Would you vote for, or what would you think of someone who voted for, someone who had worked with McVeigh and been his friend after he bombed the federal building?

If so, why?

 
Clicky Web Analytics