ÐHwww.dakotavoice.com/2008/10/82-seconds-that-are-damning-to.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2008/10/82-seconds-that-are-damning-to.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\s59c.ampx^IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈ@ä0UOKtext/htmlUTF-8gzip (B0UÿÿÿÿJ}/yFri, 02 Jan 2009 08:31:05 GMT"a5083d20-e8a9-49f8-b5f1-f029e5fff544"¯+Mozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *^Iÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿqo0U Dakota Voice: 82 Seconds That are Damning to Evolutionists

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Monday, October 20, 2008

82 Seconds That are Damning to Evolutionists

Everyone knows life doesn't come from lifeless materials...except evolutionists who need to believe this can happen in order for their theories to work.

Ironic, isn't it: materialists and naturalists insist that if something cannot be explained according to the laws of nature, it can't be "science."

Yet the origins of life cannot be explained according to the laws of nature (life doesn't spring from lifeless materials), and somehow this preposterous claim gets a pass.

Nice how the evolutionists worked out that little deal for themselves, isn't it?

82 seconds. That's all it takes for 'high genius' Jonathan Wells to murder half a century of origins of life research. Must see video.

"Pigs don't fly, and life doesn't just happen" - final testament of long-time atheist and legendary origins of life researcher Leslie Orgel



1 comments:

Dr. Theo said...

Exactly. The animating property of life remains as much a mystery to us as it was to Aristotle, Galen, Paracelsus, Schleiden, Watson et al.

The difference is contained in the information of life, the DNA, but the 'stuff' that makes one thing alive and another dead is inscrutable.

Teaching about biological sysytems, I sometimes ask my students to consider a random scattering of rocks on one side of a branching trail and on the other a collection of rocks arranged to make an arrow pointing in one direction. What, I ask, is the difference. Both rock collections contain the same matter and mass and the same energy. They occupy the same general space in the same time, yet there is something quite different about one from the other.

One set of rocks is just a pile of rocks. The other is all that, but also contains something that we call information. Information can come only from an intelligent source and conveys a message that is understandable to some potential observers (someone who understands the code). Furthermore, information is not contingent on an observer. If there is no one around to see the rocks, it still contains information. If an observer doesn't understand the code, this does not change the fact of the information contained. All this is beyond the reach of the material sciences. Neither physics nor chemistry nor biology can test or explain this aspect of nature. Thus, it can be shown that there are things in this world that cannot be investigated or explained by science alone. Science cannot answer the most important questions about life. Consciousness, rationality, fairness, kindness, compassion, love and hate are all made up of information; that mysterious stuff of creation that invests all life yet cannot be identified in any physical sense. Some might call it "the breath of life" spoken of in Genesis.

 
Clicky Web Analytics