ÐHwww.dakotavoice.com/2007/05/hate-crimes-bill-just-beginning.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2007/05/hate-crimes-bill-just-beginning.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\sck.s7axÔ\IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÈð( SOKtext/htmlUTF-8gzipÀ¹à SÿÿÿÿJ}/yWed, 31 Dec 2008 22:49:25 GMT"a5db0704-bddd-435c-94b8-20d6f86f7df6"ÞuMozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *Ò\IÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÐn S Dakota Voice: Hate Crimes Bill Just the Beginning

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Hate Crimes Bill Just the Beginning


The recent "hate crimes" bill passed by the U.S. House wasn't enough.

Now Rep. Barney Frank has another bill planned to force you to smile upon homosexuality in all it's varied forms and flavors.

From WorldNetDaily:

Following on the heels of an 'anti-discrimination' plan Christians insist would virtually outlaw their religious beliefs comes another proposal – introduced by openly homosexual U.S. Rep. Barney Frank – that requires businesses to give special privileges to "gay" and "transgendered" individuals.

Shari Rendall, director of legislation and public policy for Concerned Women for America, the nation's largest women's public policy group, said H.R. 2015, the "Employment Non-Discrimination Act of 2007," would be a disaster.

"This bill would unfairly extend special privileges based upon an individual's changeable sexual behaviors, rather than focusing on immutable, non-behavior characteristics such as skin color or gender. Its passage would both overtly discriminate against and muzzle people of faith. Former Secretary of State Collin Powell put it well when he said, 'Skin color is a benign, non-behavioral characteristic. Sexual orientation is perhaps the most profound of human behavioral characteristics. Comparison of the two is a convenient but invalid argument,'" Rendall said.

Ladies, how'd you like to share the bathroom at work with a man in a dress?
"This bill would force Christian, Jewish or Muslim business owners to hire people who openly choose to engage in homosexual or cross-dressing behaviors despite a sincerely held religious belief that those behaviors are dangerous, sinful and not in keeping with basic morality," added Matt Barber, policy director for cultural issues for CWFA.

"ENDA would essentially force employers to check their First Amendment protected rights to freedom of religion, speech and association at the workplace door. It's absurd! For instance, female employees would have to endure both systematic sexual harassment and a hostile work environment by being forced to share bathroom facilities with male employees who get their jollies from wearing a dress, high heels and lipstick," Barber said.

It's never enough with the parade of perverts. They won't be happy until everyone who's normal is throwing rose petals at their feet as they walk by.

So do you plan to remain silent as you have, or finally stand up against this lunacy and assaults on freedom and morality?


0 comments:

 
Clicky Web Analytics