Hwww.dakotavoice.com/2007/02/government-has-no-role-in-medical.htmlC:/Documents and Settings/Bob Ellis/My Documents/Websites/Dakota Voice Blog 20081230/www.dakotavoice.com/2007/02/government-has-no-role-in-medical.htmldelayedwww.dakotavoice.com/\sck.uu5xV5\I( KOKtext/htmlUTF-8gzipKJ}/yWed, 31 Dec 2008 22:49:25 GMT"a5db0704-bddd-435c-94b8-20d6f86f7df6"uMozilla/4.5 (compatible; HTTrack 3.0x; Windows 98)en, en, *R5\IijK Dakota Voice: Government Has No Role in Medical Decisions?

Featured Article

The Gods of Liberalism Revisited

 

The lie hasn't changed, and we still fall for it as easily as ever.  But how can we escape the snare?

 

READ ABOUT IT...

Monday, February 12, 2007

Government Has No Role in Medical Decisions?

Regarding the new South Dakota abortion ban, I also find it hypocritical that some of the same people who claim abortion is a "private" medical decision between a woman and her doctor are some of the same people who want government to run health care in this country?

So does government have a role in medicine or doesn't it?

The actual question comes down to this: does government have a role in protecting innocent human beings from being murdered? If unborn children are human beings--and science demonstrates the unborn have unique human DNA from conception onward--then government has a role in preventing their murder.


0 comments:

 
Clicky Web Analytics