|
(8/31/2005)
JAIL for Bad Judges in South Dakota The Judicial Accountability Initiative Law
By Bob Ellis Dakota Voice It used to be that only criminals had a problem with judges. However, in this day and age, it seems more innocent people are upset with the judicial system than those committing crimes. While there are many good judges in our legal system, perhaps people have good reasons for losing faith:
Malfeasance, corruption and dereliction of duty on the part of judges takes place in many forms. Sometimes the law, state and federal constitutions are ignored by judges. Sometimes judges protect the powerful at the expense of justice. Sometimes judges administer a “slap on the wrist” to dangerous criminals, leaving the public at risk from repeat offenders. Sometimes corruption is involved, and sometimes judges are just plain incompetent. South Dakota Judicial Accountability wants to do something about that. Bill Stegmeier, Team Coordinator for SDJA and Gary Zerman, the National JAIL (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) Lt. Commander-In-Chief, are working to get the South Dakota JAIL Amendment on the ballot in November 2006. Zerman recently told Dakota Voice the JAIL effort is a nationwide effort which started in California around 1994, and it has been gaining steam lately. More than 41 states have formed JAIL chapters, with
several getting the initiative placed on the legislative agenda of their
respective states. The South Dakota effort began about a year ago when
Stegmeier contacted Zerman.
The JAIL amendment seeks to hold the judicial branch of government accountable to an entity other than itself. According to Zerman, the doctrine of “judicial immunity” is at the heart of the problem with bad judges. Zerman said America was intended to have three co-equal branches of government, but the judiciary made a power grab with Justice Stephen J. Field's decisions in Randall v. Bringham, 74 U. S. 523 (1868) and Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U. S. 335 (1872), which ruled that judges may not be sued. Superior judges can sometimes withdraw that immunity for other judges accused of wrongdoing, but this relies on basically the same group policing itself, without outside accountability. Zerman said that about 88% of complaints against judges across the nation get dismissed. SDJA was gathering signatures at the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally recently. The group plans to gather 60,000 signatures by the end of October to ensure they end up with at least the required 33,500 required to get the initiative on the 2006 ballot.
*Editor's Note: This article is republished from the August 19 print edition of Dakota Voice, due to the considerable feedback it has generated. Two follow-up articles are planned for the next print edition of Dakota Voice, coming in late September. If you aren't a subscriber, you can become one here.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||