Sandusky, the Homosexual Pedophile Monster

Listen to the author read this article
[slaudio:, Listen to the author read this article]

Gina Miller

The astonishing news in the past couple of weeks out of State College, Pennsylvania has left America reeling.  It is bad enough that a monster like former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky would do the atrocious things he reportedly did to at least 8 boys, but what makes it even worse is that it appears a massive cover-up allowed him to continue his detestable treatment of those poor kids who were under his “care.”

Sandusky is charged with 40 criminal counts, 21 of them felonies, relating to sexual assault on at least 8 boys, some possibly as young as 7 or 8 years old, according to the Grand Jury presentation.  Sandusky was released on $100,000 bail by a woman judge who has ties as a volunteer and donor toSandusky’s Second Mile charity foundation for troubled kids, through which he chose his victims.

There is nothing but wickedness throughout this story, and when I read the 23-page Centre County Pennsylvania Grand Jury Presentation, I was sickened, not only by Sandusky’s actions, but also by the fact that he was taking advantage of little boys through his access to them in his Second Mile charity foundation.  These are boys who already had strikes against them, having been labeled as “troubled” kids, most of them from broken or dysfunctional families.

The butterfly logo is constructed out of four hearts: a big blue for man, a big pink for woman, a small blue for boy, a small pink for girl. The butterfly logo is used by pedophile organizations all over the world. (Credit: Norbert de Jonge)

My heart aches for those kids who Sandusky lavished with gifts, money and outings to sporting events and other “fun” things.  The boys were initially happy to get to go to the football games, practices, dinners and trips, but they did not know the terrible price they would pay for those treats.  The Grand Jury presentation is filled with the obscene details, and it is almost unimaginable that an adult would do such things to little children.

Throughout this whole ordeal, in which new, astounding details continue to emerge, I keep thinking of the words of Jesus recorded in the Gospels.  As written in Matthew 18,

“At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, ‘Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?’

And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, and said, ‘Verily I say unto you, except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.  Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven. And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.

‘But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.  Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!”

Jerry Sandusky is a man to whom that bit of Scripture directly applies.

Bryan Fischer, who is a radio host for the American Family Radio’s daily “Focal Point” program, wrote a hard-hitting piece on Sandusky that was published on Saturday at the Renew America website.  In part, Mr. Fischer wrote,

“Jerry Sandusky faces 450 years in prison but deserves to die.

Sandusky is the former assistant coach at Penn State who has been charged with the sexual molestation of at least eight boys, some as young as age 10. Later accounts indicate that the toll may now be as high as 20, and that number is likely to grow as more details of this sordid affair come to light.

Despicably, Sandusky had access to these young boys through his charitable work with at-risk youth, a horrid abuse of trust and power.

… Sandusky was not reported to law enforcement authorities, as required by law, but instead, according to numerous press accounts, was allowed to resign in exchange for Penn State’s silence.

Now stories are circulating that Sandusky may have pimped out his young charges at The Second Mile foundation to high rolling Penn State donors, a story which, if true, will consign any number of people to one of the lowest circles in hell.”

This is nearly beyond comprehension.  We have yet to hear any further information regarding the pimping rumors, but we do know thatSandusky’s behavior was not reported to law enforcement authorities, and two Penn State officials have been charged with failing to alert police of the complaints against Sandusky.  And, as you know, Head Coach Joe Paterno and Penn State President Graham Spanier were both fired.  Both of them had prior knowledge of the complaints against Sandusky.

Penn State’s Athletic Director Tim Curley and Senior Vice President for Business and Finance Gary Schultz were both told by a graduate assistant that he witnessed Sandusky raping a little boy in one of the football building shower rooms on campus, but both Curley and Schultz denied having this knowledge when they testified before the Grand Jury during its 18-month investigation.  Instead of telling the truth, they chose to downplay the incident asSandusky“horsing around” with the child in the shower.  They lied to protect themselves, but in this case, their lies did not succeed.  The Grand Jury states that these two men provided “materially false statements under oath in an official proceeding.”

Lying under oath, covering up child rape—what would make these men, as well as Joe Paterno and others, deliberately bury these awful actions of Sandusky?  Is the reputation of Penn State and the football program more important than the lives and spirits of all these little boys?  In no way is it, but apparently the power of the forces of college football were stronger than any desire these people may have had to do the right thing and put a stop to the homosexual pedophile monster Jerry Sandusky.

In his column, Bryan Fischer makes the point that all the attention that is being given to Coach Paterno and the others is an attempt to distract from the homosexual aspect of Sandusky’s hellish behavior.

“The press has focused largely on Paterno and others in the Penn State hierarchy who covered up Sandusky’s pedophilia, some of whom even committed perjury to keep his dark and dirty secret from being exposed.

But perhaps some of that press focus is diversionary, to direct the attention of the public away from one of the darkest pathologies associated with homosexual behavior: homosexuals molest children at ten times the rate of heterosexuals.

Homosexual activists will of course lamely argue that since Sandusky is married, he is not a homosexual. Fine, call him bisexual if you will. But his sex crimes are same-sex crimes, and 10-year old boys whose bodies have been cruelly invaded could [not] care less what label homosexual activists want to slap on their abuser.

A study of 229 convicted child molesters in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that 86 percent of offenders against males ‘described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.’ Despite comprising about three percent of the population, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of all sex offenses against children.”

Yes, Sandusky is one of the worst of the worst.  When I consider the unnatural and barbaric nature of his treatment of all those little boys, I continue to be outraged that groups such as the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) are allowed to exist in our nation.  NAMBLA is described on the Metapedia website as,

“… a pedophile and homosexual criminal cabal located in the United States, that lobbies to abolish laws which protect children from sexual abuse at the hands of perverts.  It also wants the pedophile criminals who have been caught and put in prison for sexually abusing children to be released.”

Who could have imagined even a generation ago that we here in  America would ever allow such degenerate vegetables to come out of their sick shadows and actually lobby for this kind of wickedness?  Those pedophile deviants deserve no less scorn for their dark and diseased minds than does Sandusky, because they support the very things Sandusky is accused of doing.

This awful story is far from over, and in fact, it may never be over for the victims.  The terrible effects of childhood sexual abuse remain throughout the lives of those people who have been victims of adult sex predators, although there is emotional and spiritual healing available through the Lord if any of them takes hold of Him.  We have no way of knowing how many boys were sexually assaulted by Jerry Sandusky, but I have no doubt it is a much larger number than will ever be officially known.

As hidden truths are uncovered, it is likely that more people will be implicated in this horrendous cover-up.  What about Sandusky’s wife and his six adopted children?  Did they have a clue?  Many of the sex abuse instances are reported to have occurred in the Sandusky home. Sandusky has been married to the same woman since the mid-1960s, and she would have to be one oblivious lady not to have known of her husband’s evil proclivities, but I suppose it is not out of the realm of possibility that she was unaware.  After all, we often do not see what we do not want to see.

Regardless of who knew what and when, ultimately, the law will deal with Jerry Sandusky, and hopefully he will be stopped from preying on children by being locked up for the rest of his unnatural life.

Gina Miller, a native of Texas, is a radio commentator. She also works with her husband installing and repairing residential irrigation systems and doing landscaping on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.

52 Responses to “Sandusky, the Homosexual Pedophile Monster”

  1. When sexual immorality is given the green light by society, some act surprised when others draw a different line in the sand than they do.

  2.  Absolutely correct, Veldy.   There had been a solid line, a fortified fence actually, for centuries, if not for millennia, demarcating the acceptable from the atrocious.  That line no longer exists in much of society.

  3. I have edited the second sentence in the column, because the way it was originally worded caused misunderstanding in at least one reader (at Free Republic).  The original sentence led her to believe I was downplaying the child rape, but that was certainly not the case.  The point of the sentence is that the massive cover-up that allowed Sandusky to continue his crimes made the whole ordeal even worse.

  4. He should be hung, there are also a lot of pedophiles in adoption as it is an abnormal freak experiment, and a lot of closet homosexuals in it too.  

  5. Uh, Sandusky is a STRAIGHT, MARRIED, FATHER.  This argument that homosexuality = pedophilia is so disgustingly untrue. You do a disservice by framing your article like this. It makes you sound ignorant, hateful, and not well informed about the news. 

  6.  When a pedophile makes an exclusive PREFERENCE for a specific sex, in this case the same sex, that makes him a HOMOSEXUAL pedophile.

    The modern homosexual “rights” movement is organically attached to pedophilia.  You can deny it all you want, but the facts are there for anyone with enough honesty to see.

  7. Nice try, Gina. And no doubt the next time you read about some guy getting busted for sexually abusing a little girl, you’ll be referring to him as a HETEROSEXUAL pedophile monster. No? I didn’t think so.

  8.  Try sticking the the subject at hand, PB.  AADD is treatable.

  9. Um, I believe Bryan Fischer already addressed and debunked your lame attempt and misdirection and obfuscation, and that quote is included in this article.

    Perhaps you should read the article again and see if you can catch it this time…if you have the slightest interest in truth, that is.

    Failure to do so makes you sound ignorant, hateful. and not well informed about the news.

  10. The reason *not* to call them a “heterosexual pedophile monster” would be that “heterosexual” is generally implied in the absence of the word “homosexual” — given that “heterosexual” is the normal human default in the absence of sexual abnormalities. Besides, a guy who would sexually abuse a little girl isn’t really functioning as a normal “heterosexual” anyway.

  11. Don’t talk to me about men preying on little girls. I was a little girl once, and I know quite well that pedophile monsters are everywhere, and they prey on little girls and little boys.

    This particular story concerns a homosexual pedophile, and that is just a fact. Statistics also back up the fact that male homosexuals inordinately prey on boys compared to heterosexual pedophiles who prey on little girls, although the problem is more widespread than most people dare to imagine.

  12. “This argument that homosexuality = pedophilia is so disgustingly untrue.” — It’s also not the argument that anyone here is actually making. Not all homosexuals are pedophiles, and not all pedophiles are homosexuals. Everyone knows that. The point is that people who practice homosexuality also practice pedophilia at a remarkably high rate. And that is a point you can’t dispute (which is probably why it’s not the point you actually tried to dispute).

  13. Very good points, DCM!

  14. Most “gay” apologists currently try to disassociate homosexuality from pedophilia, but it’s really just a PR thing for them. I’d like to see how many of them still say pedophilia is not OK if & when pedophilia gains societal acceptance the way homosexuality has.

  15. You don’t know what you are talking about, a pedophile is attracted to certain things (which this forum is not the place to explain it) and have nothing to do with what attracts one homosexual to another.

  16. I don’t know what I’m talking about?!  You sound desperate to remove the fact that Sandusky, a male, preyed on little children who were also male.  That is a homosexual pedophile.  You can attempt to deny the obvious truth all you like, but it will not change the truth.

  17. The fact that this pig is a homosexual pedophile monster is the truth. No wonder this sick Satanic vulture adopted and fostered children as he is an abnormal freak that cannot make babies normally. His friends and associates should be investigated as these pedophile agents of Satan often flock together. There is also many other pedophiles hiding under the guise of being gay, watch out for these beasts, especially those that also want to adopt, they are sick, disgusting parasites looking for victims!   

  18. Rupert, I see the homosexual activists are out in force here screeching the Bryan Fischer line I quoted in my column. The homo-activists are desperate to put a non-existent wall between homosexual child predators and homosexuals who only prey on fellow adults, consenting or otherwise.

  19. Apparently you don’t know what you’re talking about, or you simply don’t want to know. I think it’s probably the latter, since the relationship between homosexual behavior and pedophilia has been explained in some detail here, both in the main article and in the comments section.

  20. Plainly, you missed my wry point.

  21. Wow, you truly are deluded, aren’t you? I continue to marvel at how allowing immoral attitudes to take hold in one’s heart can reduce an otherwise intelligent and educated person to behaving in a completely obtuse fashion.

    Allow me to help. You understand what “sexual” and “sexuality” means, right? Hopefully we don’t need to drop into that low a gear. Do you know what “homo” means? It means “same.” Therefore, a “homosexual” is “same sexual,” as opposed to a “heterosexual” who is “other sexual.”

    That means sexual relations between people of the same sex is homosexual.

    Yes, it involves a type of sexual interest, but it cannot be separated from the behavior. Behavior is the ultimate delineator of whether something wrong has been done or not. I may have an interest in punching a particularly irritating idiot in front of me in the checkout line…but I have not given in to that temptation and thus done something wrong unless I act on that interest.

    Obviously, Sandusky acted on his interest, and thus did something immoral. Likewise, a person with a homosexual interest who acts on that interest has done something wrong (whereas someone with a mere interest/temptation has not done anything wrong). In Sandusky’s case, he has acted on his interest in having sex with someone of the same sex, and he has acted on his interest in having sex with someone underage–two moral wrongs in the same act. Surely you aren’t saying that Sandusky’s actions did not constitute homosexuality, and surely you are not saying Sandusky’s actions did not constitute pedophilia, because they clearly constitute both.

    And, as has been documented clinically and pointed out here, the coincidence of acting on a homosexual interest and acting on an interest in sex with underage people is quite significant.

    The laughable statement “the abuse of boys by homosexual men to be extremely rare” is so completely divorced from reality that it can only be adequately be described as an example of desperate propaganda. It’s like saying “intercourse with women by heterosexual men is extremely rare.” As the act of a man having intercourse with a woman is inherently heterosexual (i.e. other-sexual), so the act of a man having sex with a boy is inherently homosexual (i.e. same-sexual).

    The silly propensity of homosexual activists to make truly illogical and asinine statements would be hilarious…were not so many people’s bodies, souls and lives being devastated by such outrageous deceptions.

  22. There is some truth in what you say. However, as outlined in the article, there is a compelling connection between pedophilia and homosexuality.

  23. I’m plenty expert enough to realize when someone is delusional and making statements that aren’t even remotely grounded in facts or reality–as the one you parroted was. I explained why, and my logic was impeccable and irrefutable. You simply don’t like the conclusion it points to.

    You don’t have to like the truth, but you don’t get to manufacture a different reality more suited to your moral failures.

  24. Yes, that’s the issue here, you are self educated from narrow sources, you are not Brian L. Cutler, author of Encyclopedia of Psychology and Law, SAGE, 2008. I bet he would diagnose you as delusional.

  25. If he is delusional enough to have “considered the abuse of boys by homosexual men to be extremely rare” (when such contact is, by definition, homosexual), or anything similarly divorced from reality, he might just be insane enough to diagnose a person who makes logical and irrefutable statements as “delusional.”

    In other words, when you don’t live in reality, reality probably looks pretty crazy…but that doens’t change the fact that it’s reality.

    Still having trouble summoning what it takes to act like a grownup?

  26. You are thinking of this in too simple of terms.You want to demonize homosexuality with the same pedophile brush.
    You are seriously lost in your desperate desire to give legitimacy to the hellishly illegitimate.

  27.  Great post Gina!

  28. The fallacy in the politically correct, pseudoscientific “expert” testimony you reference is that pedophilia is a “disorder of sexual preference” while homosexuality is an “orientation.” It may have become common for those things to be officially labeled thus, but official labeling doesn’t change what something actually is. Both are disorders of sexual preference. Calling either one anything else doesn’t fool anyone who doesn’t want to be fooled.

    Plus, where will your “expert” testimony be if & when pedophiles succeed in having their “disorder of sexual preference” officially labeled an “orientation”?

  29. so homosexuality isn’t a deviant perversion it’s just that every child molester is gay, that makes plenty of sense

  30. Thank you, David!

  31. I’ll bet you’re right, JA.

  32. Not every one… just a remarkably high proportion.

  33. What?  Who said “every child molester is gay”?

    However, both homosexuality and child sexual abuse are most certainly deviant perversions.

  34. “You can deny it all you want, but the facts are there for anyone with enough honesty to see.”
    OK, back up your claims with facts, pal: 97% of child sex abuse is not only perpetrated BY men ON girls, but often relatives of the victim… hardly “family values”:

  35. I take it you are responding to thisoldspouse’s comment:

    When a pedophile makes an exclusive PREFERENCE for a specific sex, in this case the same sex, that makes him a HOMOSEXUAL pedophile.

    The modern homosexual “rights” movement is organically attached to pedophilia. You can deny it all you want, but the facts are there for anyone with enough honesty to see.

    So I believe (at the risk of sounding repetitive here) that it is plain for anyone with enough honesty to see that he made the assertion: “When a pedophile makes an exclusive PREFERENCE for a specific sex, in this case the same sex, that makes him a HOMOSEXUAL pedophile.”

    Do you deny this? Are you trying to argue against it? If you’re going to question a person’s statement, the honest thing to do is, um, question that person’s statement, not question their statement with a bait-and-switch demand for an answer to a different issue.

    But since you asked…

    A study published in 1987 in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that homosexuals sexually molest young boys with an incidence five times greater than the heteroesexual molestation of girls.

    An editorial in the San Francisco Sentinel, a member of the National Lesbian & Gay Journalist’s Association stated that “The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality. For the gay community to imply that boy-love is not homosexual love is ridiculous.”

    A Department of Justice data shows that 64% of forcible sodomy victims are boys under 12.

    Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education, looked at the leading homosexual travel guide and said, “Forty-seven percent of the 139 nations they talked about identified places to find boys. The average heterosexual travel guide is not concerned with finding children.”

    A study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found that while less than 3% of men attracted to adults are homosexual, 25-40% of men attracted to children preferred boys, meaning a homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles.

    Another study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior again found less than 3% homosexuality in men attracted to adults, but homosexuality among pedophiles as high as 30-40%. Obviously, this is highly disproportionate.

    A study in the Archives of Sexual Behavior found 86% of sex offenders against males identified themselves as homosexual or bisexual.

    An article from the Journal of Homosexuality by Helmut Graupner in 1999 claimed that homosexual relations with minor children should be considered a “gay rights issue” and that children wouldn’t necessarily be harmed by having sex with adults.

    A study by Dr. Gene Able, director of the Behavioral Sciences Institute in Atlanta found that 150 boys are abused by one male homosexual offender, compared to 19.8 girls by heterosexual offenders. Wow.

    Interestingly, a study published in London a couple of years ago found that of the 4244 homosexuals in the study, 1686 (40%) reported childhood sexual abuse. Other studies have revealed similar findings, with some even higher. There is a strong coincidence between adult homosexual behavior in people who were molested as children.

    Meanwhile, the move is fast afoot to declare pedophilia a “sexual orientation.” There has already been testimony in the Canadian Parliament in support of this, and the pedophile group B4U-ACT hosted a few months ago a conference in which the argument was made that it is now time to normalize pedophilia.

    So yeah, such connections from a group that makes up less than 3% of the total population is pretty interesting. Obviously not ever homosexual is a pedophile, and not every pedophile is a homosexual. But there seems to be a high incidence of interest in children among homosexuals, and a high incidence of molested children who go on to live as homosexuals when they grow up. Almost a self-perpetuating cycle of hurt and pain.

  36. Since the homosexual agenda is to cover shame with laws and aggressive political correctness, it follows that homosexuals will support pedophilia and thereby take the focus off their “fight”, legitimize their ;lifestyle and choice and remove their shame, (at least they hope). It’s sad to see our society stoop to these low levels of behavior. I’ve never met any “gay” person that was truly at peace with themselves, vthey are full of shame, or bitter or in denial. Many live tragic hopeless lives.. ..but there is hope – I believe there is an organization called Exodus International that might help.

  37. I have already provided many elements that point to an incontrovertible link between homosexual behavior and pedophilia ( ), and you pretend this evidence doesn’t exist.

    This is what I meant earlier when I said you are behaving like a child. Grownups look at evidence and adjust their opinion to fit reality; children expect reality to conform to their wishes. There really isn’t much point in trying to have an intelligent conversation with a person who refuses to adjust to and live in the real world.

  38. Toxic.  That’s the only word I could possibly think of after reading this.

    Here, you have a man, who a mere few weeks ago would have represented *everything* you would have called good and Godly.  He was as American as apple pie.  Married man for decades – check.  Raised many foster children and adopted children – check.  Registered Republican – check.  Former football player and coach – check.  Founder of children’s charity – check.  

    Without knowing about his disturbing behavior, you may have written a piece of praise, telling your followers how more people should be like Sandusky.

    Now, all you’ve done is write a piece on how more people like Sandusky should simply ‘do it better.’  You have taken the suffering of children and exploited it for your own quest against something you call the gay agenda (the only agenda I know of is one that strives for equal treatment under the law).

    It’s pointless to cite all the respected psychological, medical, and other associations who have made it very clear Fisher’s statements like “homosexuals molest children at ten times the rate of heterosexuals” are complete lies and conservative propaganda to inject fear in the mindless because you’ll probably give me the same tin-foil babble about the gay lobby taking over and influencing these scientifically published facts.  So what I’ll say is this:

    You’re not interested in helping children, Gina.  If you were, this story would have immediately made you more suspicious of the common-man.  You wouldn’t immediately launch a foaming-at-the-mouth attack on gays.  You’d be more interested in investigating all these children’s organizations and any mention of possible abuse, regardless of how “good” the person at the helm of the organization is.  A month ago, Jerry Sandusky would have been celebrated.  So what you’re really telling us is – don’t act gay.  Don’t be gay.  Just be better at staying in the closet.  Be better at abusing little children such that we don’t find out about it.  I’m not interested in getting to the bottom of these issues and finding the real abusers – I solely want to persecute a minority based on baseless lies from organizations who profit off them.  

    Sandusky was a “family man” and someone who would have completely flown under your radar, Gina.  And you’re clearly not interested in catching the Sandusky-types.  You’re telling your followers to be suspicious of their flamboyant hairdressers. You’re telling your followers to not trust the local theater crowd.  You’re telling them to connect more with their families, with their communities, and with God.  I’m sorry Gina, but it seems like most of this trouble comes directly from the places you would least expect it and the places you’d like everyone to be.  Just toxic – a roadmap to fly under the conservative radar.  You should be proud, Gina.  You just told abusers how to do it better.

  39. Sadly, you are simply so desperate to excuse an immoral, unnatural and dangerous (to the individual practicing it, and to others) behavior, that you have taken the suffering of children and exploited it as a human shield to avoid dealing with the destructive consequences of perverting human sexuality.

    Gina’s piece is quite clear as to the exact nature and scope of what she is examining and condemning. What’s more, the link between homosexuality and pedophilia has been demonstrated in great detail throughout the comments section.

    None of that is important to you. You would rather attack the messenger, and accuse the messenger of enabling this kind of conduct when it is YOU who is attempting to whitewash the problem.

    You’re going to have a lot to answer for when you stand before your Maker.

  40. Bob, I’m quite confident in a hillbilly bunch like yourselves to display that “link between homosexuality and pedophilia” in your comments section.  Unfortunately, there is no respected, scientific journal that’s willing to back you up.  You can have your blogs, and comment sections, and hate-groups like the FRC and NOM, but you’ll never be able to bring these statistics into a courtroom or anywhere else that bases judgment on those pesky little facts.  

    My only hope is that you’re correct with your final statement about a “Maker.”  May He or She or They have mercy on your soul for being so utterly, hopelessly brainwashed into blind discrimination by using baseless, bigoted “facts.”

    PS – Nice try with spinning my argument about exploitation as your own.  You folks have become very good at using an other’s material – probably because yours is so weak, worthless, and withering.  

  41. Your arrogance just leaves you looking extremely stupid, since, if you weren’t such an elitist snob or so completely hostile to truth, you might have taken a minute or two to peruse the comments here and learned the magnitude of your error.

    Because I’m sure that even Massachusetts snob like yourself wouldn’t consider sources like the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, the San Francisco Sentinel, the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association, the Department of Justice, the Archives of Sexual Behavior, the Journal of Homosexuality, as well as a number of other sources to be “hillbilly.”

    Not to say that truth-telling groups like FRC and NOM aren’t reliable, but I understand that you are so hostile to anything that interferes with your fantasy world that there is zero chance you would have a mind open enough to consider anything from those sources.

    Then again, maybe you would be arrogant enough to write off the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, the San Francisco Sentinel, et al, since you apparently think you know more than God. That takes a lot of arrogance indeed.

    But again, you’ll have to answer to Him for that, too, along with your exploitation here in trying to whitewash evil. I’m sure you’re too arrogant to appreciate it, but I do hope you get your head straight so you can repent of this attitude before you face eternal judgment for it.

  42. I don’t seem to understand the argument. First a man that has sex with another male is a homosexual, unless of course the other male is a young boy. That makes it not homosexuality but Pedophilia, which some are saying is somehow different. To me this logic is as sick as homosexuality. Someone please explain to me one positive aspect of homosexuality just one.

  43. It’s homosexual pedophilia. And no, there isn’t any positive aspect of homosexuality.

  44. So, so desperate to avoid the truth, huh? If they weren’t in the Prop 8 case (which is completely unrelated to this), they can’t be true, right?

    How do you live with yourself? I don’t know from experience, but I would think that someone who goes to such extremes to avoid reality would somehow alert ones self to their own state of denial. I mean, I’ve seen some closed eyes and dead consciences in people in my time, but come on…

    By the way, telling the truth as we do here, we get plenty of elitist creeps like you, so it helps to be able to tell where they’re coming from so that we can deal with them accordingly when they get out of hand.

  45. The only true “denial” here comes from the moderator who won’t post my response until he has his own rebuttal ready.  Your rationale for finding out where I am from is weaker than your arguments against the LGBT community – pretty sad indeed Bobby Boy.  Enjoy your last few moments before we get full equality. I’m sure someone as eloquent and well-versed at hating like yourself won’t have any troubling finding a new group to bash.

  46. You already have equality. That isn’t good enough for people who are deeply insecure and know deep-down that they are engaging in behavior that is unnatural and highly immoral. No, in order to get some extra distance between yourselves and your troublesome conscience, you feel compelled to demand special rights and protections, so that you can force others to appear to validate your self-destructive choices.

    Sorry, it isn’t going to work. Homosexual activists have jumped the shark, and people are waking up to the reality that the homosexual agenda has never been about tolerance, but about demanding that society affirm this destructive behavior. This fad will pass.

    And as I frequently have to inform insecure denialists like yourself, this website exists for the purpose of informing those who know the truth and are engaged in combating the darkness of this world, and those who are open to the truth. It is not a playground for those desperate to convince themselves and others of the legitimacy of a behavior that is completely bereft of legitimacy. My prayer goes with you that you will accept the truth before it’s too late.

  47. Bob, thank you for dealing with Mr. DNA Strand here. I did not see his retarded attack against me last night, and that’s a good thing, because I might have said something I really mean.

    The homosexual radicals are quite irritating and irrational, and you are the best at deconstructing their gossamer arguments.

  48. You’ve got it, JA!

  49. you’re the one uninformed.
    his 2 marriages were covers, all his kids adopted from the  second mile program, and one mother of a child he adopted-as a teen- has stated before the media in tv interviews she believed he molested her son as a teen and he stayed quiet out of fear.He’s a gay dude. In the future these guys will just get married to same sex partners and adopt.

  50. lies. at least 1/3 of all child sex rape is committed by 3% of the population which is gay. that’s probably very low numbers since boys are taught to internalize victimization and not report it.
    other stats are as high as 1/6 boys.
    these are old fashioned homosexual pederasts or chickenhawks at work.