The Evil Lie of Diversity

Listen to the author read this article

Gina Miller

There is no doubt you have noticed that one of the fundamental tenets of the leftist, communist enemies within our country is the illusion that “diversity” somehow leads to “unity.”  This has long irked me, because I know why the Left wants to foist that brazen lie on our great nation, and it’s time for us to talk about this evil fallacy.

Think back to Genesis, chapter 11, in the account of Babel.  At that time, the people of the earth were united by purpose and a single, common language.  Their intentions became evil vanity, as they determined to build a tower into heaven to “make a name” for themselves—to be on the same level as God.

God saw their wrong-headed path, and He put a stop to it, because He knew that since they were unified in purpose and speech, they would succeed.  What did He do to stop them?  He used diversity.  He confounded their language so that they had diverse speech and could no longer understand each other.  He used diversity to break their unity.

He also used diversity of location.  The Bible does not say how God scattered the people all across the world, but for all we know, He could have easily separated the continents in a single moment, thereby “diversifying” the people’s locations.  Not to get off on a rabbit trail, but have you ever looked at a world map and noticed how much the land masses look like pieces of a puzzle that would fit together if you pushed them back in place?

Artist Marten van Valckenborch's concept of the Tower of Babel

It is in unity that people are effective, that they have power to accomplish their goals and desires.  The Left knows this quite well, and thus, one of their main aims is to keep our nation divided against itself.  A divided America benefits the communist Left.  Their whole platform and base of power depends on keeping people in enmity against one another.

Therefore, they push the lie that diversity is a good thing.  Barack Obama toes the party line when he says, “We find unity in our incredible diversity…”  Uh, actually, no we don’t, Barry.  Unity is found in like-mindedness and common goals, despite diversity of types, not because of it.

Our nation has been called The Great Melting Pot.  What does that mean?  It means that one of the things that makes America an excellent nation is that people of all sorts come here and assimilate.  They bring their various nationalities and backgrounds to our shores, and they become Americans, united under our founding principles and documents and our proud flag.  They learn our language, our heritage, and our American way of life, and they embrace them.  Out of many, we are united as One.  That American unity has given us amazing strength in years past.

But, as we have seen in recent decades, those on the communist Left have waged a campaign of separation, wherein they encourage immigrants to not assimilate, to not learn our language, to be diverse from our nation as a whole.  This campaign of diversity is not only waged against immigrants, but also against American citizens, who the Left has kept divided by race and wealth.

The Left has created a huge industry of diversity.  “Diversity training” is big business.  Do an Internet search of “diversity training,” and you will get millions of pages dedicated to the subject.  Corporate America has signed on to the concept and practice of diversity training, partly due to it being sold as a way to avoid lawsuits.

What kind of lawsuits does diversity training supposedly help prevent?  Perceived civil rights violations are one type.  This is ridiculous, of course.  America is not a civil rights violating country, hasn’t been for many, many years.  Yet, part of the sickness of our current society is this selfish sense of entitlement that has been bred into many people in our nation.  They believe that they have a right to not be offended, and they confuse being offended with having some imagined right violated.  Lawsuit abuse is a disease in America.

However, the deeper purpose of diversity training is more sinister than the superficial advertised purposes of protection from lawsuits and preparing employees to work in a global market.  The deeper purpose is to feed division, not promote unity, and another purpose is to promote immorality.

Homosexuals and Islamists are two of the big stars of diversity training.  In the case of homosexuality, diversity training is nothing more than a push for acceptance of that immoral behavior.

The Mission America website has a helpful list of questions to ask if you are a teacher or student forced to undergo homosexual diversity training, although these questions at the site would be helpful to anyone being compelled to participate in one of these “re-education camp” sessions.  The opening message to the questions states,

“As a teacher or student, if you are forced to participate in ‘diversity’ or ‘sensitivity’ training, don’t just sit there and let them spoonfeed twisted concepts through manipulative exercises and false information. Raise your hand, bring up the following issues and expose the real nature of what is taking place: they want to force people to accept homosexual behavior, even if some don’t like it and the responsible facts don’t support it.

It’s time to object, question and expose the truth in open and frank discussions.”

Islamic diversity training is prevalent, too, and in the same way that Americans are subjected to homosexual propaganda in diversity training sessions, Islamist propaganda is also put forth in them.  Millions of Americans are aware of the mission of Islamists in our country and around the world, and we want nothing to do with their backward Shariah law.  No amount of diversity training will change what we know about the goals of the Islamists to create a global Islamic state and subjugate non-Muslims under their warped caliphate.

Nevertheless, malignant Islamist lobby groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) have succeeded in having Islamic “cultural” diversity training forced on many Americans, including in our law enforcement, military and intelligence communities.

Another disturbing aspect of diversity training is that it assumes Americans are too stupid to treat others with kindness and respect.  One telling paragraph from the Diversity Training University International website states,

“Americans are not socialized adequately to live and work in multicultural settings. Where there is employee diversity, diversity-related problems are either waiting to happen or they exist under the surface. The increased numbers of harassment and discrimination multimillion dollar lawsuits settlements attest to this. Many managers are not prepared to deal with the reality of workplace diversity. They do not act on employee diversity-related complaints because they are ill-prepared.”

We’re not “socialized adequately”?  And, that’s the reason for the increased numbers of harassment and discrimination lawsuits?  That is pure bunk!  Those lawsuits are a symptom of the childish entitlement mentality infecting our nation.  I’ll tell you who is not adequately “socialized;” it’s those who are self-centered enough to insist that the world revolves around them and their agenda.

The Left, in true hypocritical fashion, drops its love affair with diversity when the diverse ideas of conservatism and Christianity are put forth.  Instead of walking the walk, leftists only talk the talk of diversity of ideas.  In reality, they are rigidly against the principles of Christianity and conservatism.

Division is the order of the day for the Left.  If Americans became united behind saving our country from the cancer of communist liberalism, the Left would not stand a chance, and they know it.  That’s why the Left, and the “Republican” Left, so despise the Tea Party movement.  This American phenomenon has a unity of mind and purpose that is truly a threat to the power of the Left.  From the Tea Party’s birth, the Left has sought to destroy the movement, because the Tea Party scares the Left to death.

If we have any hope at all of removing the destructive power of the Left in our nation, then conservative patriot unity is essential.  Unity under a righteous cause is critical.  Therein lies power.  In division, or diversity of purpose, there is no power, only strife.

As it currently stands, the Tea Party movement is the best source of unity and power on the conservative side.  It is important that we stand with our local Tea Party groups to grow them ever larger and support them in their efforts to restore fiscal sanity to our federal government.

Those of us who are Christians also know that this is about much more than fiscal policies.  Our nation is infected with the disease of moral corruption, and we will never have sound, conservative fiscal policies as long as moral corruption reigns supreme in our local, state and federal governments, not to mention, our society as a whole.

We must strive to be unified under right reasons, and we must pray for our country and pray for the Lord to grant us leaders who are morally upright to replace the communist scourge of leftists that are currently entrenched in our courts, institutions and government.

We must shun diversity and embrace unity of conservatism, regardless of our racial and social backgrounds.  Those of us who love America must be unified as the Left is unified in its detestable campaign to destroy our country.

For Christians, keep in mind the Word of God-given through Paul in his letter to the Philippians,

“Therefore if you have any encouragement from being united with Christ, if any comfort from his love, if any common sharing in the Spirit, if any tenderness and compassion,  then make my joy complete by being like-minded, having the same love, being one in spirit and of one mind.”

Gina Miller, a native of Texas, is a radio commentator and disc jockey. She also works with her husband installing and repairing residential irrigation systems and doing landscaping on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.

26 Responses to “The Evil Lie of Diversity”

  1. You have ventured into the epicenter of the leftist agenda, Gina.  Their forced indoctrination in the form of “diversity training” and “anti-bullying” campaigns is their surest and most powerful chain against the unwilling, moral majority in this country.  As soon as Leftists get an organization to acquiesce to the “need” for this propaganda, employees are powerless to refuse at the risk of discipline and a sullied work record at best, and termination at worst. 

    I have been fortunate enough to not having been subjected to this overtly, but a municipality I worked for was moving in that direction, with the session coming uncomfortably close to indoctrination.  But I have heard of the disgusting content of diversity training that many have had to endure, the most recent being in our military where marines were told that they had to suppress any adverser reaction they had to two male marines kissing in public.  Imagine a marine just disagreeing with being told this in class – he risks his career by even questioning the advancement of homosexual normalization.   More locally, my once-fine city of Ft. Worth has undergone the most deplorable imposition of forced homosexual normalization, with police officers being forced to accept this at the risk of discipline up to termination.  The police chief and several other administration officials were forced to visit a homosexual bar were all-but-nude male dancers “perform” in cages, just to placate (actually as a trophy of conquest to) the homosexual hoards.

    The telling part of this “training” is that it has no resolution; no definitive end objective.  It is forever “progressing” to some unnamed, infinite list of demands – a blank check for the sodomites to fill in the amounts in never-ending installments.  We are now down to deciding if “gender reassignment” surgery should be provided to employees in the city’s insurance plan.  That is how absolutely insane this satanic agenda is.

  2. Spouse it’s bad and worse, isn’t it?!  We’ve let this thing get so deeply entrenched in our corporate, educational, military, law enforcement, and other areas, that it will be next to impossible to purge and heal our nation of the disease of “diversity.”  It’s pretty much a terminal illness.

  3. Simply put perhaps emphasizing unity and NOT diversity is the best policy  

  4. Is an “Islamist” the same thing as a “Muslim?”
     

  5. Yes. 

  6.  So why not call them Muslims? That seems to be commonly accepted term.

  7. For the same reason I call liberals communists.

  8. Liberals are called “libtards” 

  9.  Mohammedans also works.  We have a rich language.

  10. Right, JA! The origin of the word “diversity” in Middle English and Latin, means, “difference,” and it’s from a word that means, “to turn in different directions.” Difference is the bottom line.

    The communist Left is a bunch of evil, lying, suicidal maniacs.

  11. That seems to be a redundant term. 

  12. I grew up in a neighborhood where my neighbors were diverse
    in race, ethnicity, politically and cultural backgrounds. My next door neighbors
    were Armenian refugees on one side. On the other side was Japanese family.
    Three of their Children were born in the Manzanar Interment, Camp during WWII,
    and the two sons served in the U.S. Army in the early 1960’s. In the house
    behind us, was a family whom were Catholics of Italian heritage. Across the
    street lived a family with Mexican ancestry. The living room was filled with photographic
    portraits of family members in U. S. Armed forces uniforms. The family which lived
    next door to them was immigrants from the Philippines. It was a neighborhood where
    we all got along, played together, went to the same schools, helped one
    another, and shared our diverse backgrounds. At my mother’s funeral, one of her
    friends noted the diversity of the people attending her service. I looked up to
    a couple of my old neighbors and we smiled. Of course this may seem to be
    unusual from the Dakotas with homogeneous demographics. But it does work.

  13. I grew up in a neighborhood where my neighbors were diverse
    in race, ethnicity, politically and cultural backgrounds. My next door neighbors
    were Armenian refugees on one side. On the other side was Japanese family.
    Three of their Children were born in the Manzanar Interment, Camp during WWII,
    and the two sons served in the U.S. Army in the early 1960’s. In the house
    behind us, was a family whom were Catholics of Italian heritage. Across the
    street lived a family with Mexican ancestry. The living room was filled with photographic
    portraits of family members in U. S. Armed forces uniforms. The family which lived
    next door to them was immigrants from the Philippines. It was a neighborhood where
    we all got along, played together, went to the same schools, helped one
    another, and shared our diverse backgrounds. At my mother’s funeral, one of her
    friends noted the diversity of the people attending her service. I looked up to
    a couple of my old neighbors and we smiled. Of course this may seem to be
    unusual from the Dakotas with homogeneous demographics. But it does work.

  14. Excuse me, Larry, but it sounds like your neighborhood was UNIFIED, DESPITE ITS DIVERSITY–that’s what I was talking about in the column, in case you didn’t notice. It is the LEFT that works to keep us divided by stupid things like skin color. We are all Americans, and those of us who LOVE America can be UNITED, DESPITE our DIVERSE backgrouds! Hopefully you will understand the seriousness of my point and situation we currently face in America.

    By the way, I’m not writing from the Dakotas; and, further, I am a “half-breed” American–half Texan (“white”) and half Texan-Mexican–a “diverse” gal, if you will.

  15. I also grew up (in Illinois) in a poor mixed neighborhood.  I attended parochial schools where the classes were about a third black and with the white contingent made up of names like Pizarek, Cousamono, Cici, O’Toole, Janewic, Jastremski, Colobrusco, Schults and Holmeier.  Many of these students heard one language spoken at home and another at school.  Many went home to dinners of food whose name I couldn’t pronounce, but I enjoyed happily when invited to join them.

    Yes, the ancestries of these kids, white and black, were quite diverse and their particular heritage was often celebrated in their homes.  But we were united in our faith, our values, our work ethic, our respect for authority, our love of family and our love of Country.  We were all Americans and we were proud of it.  As Gina has pointed out, it was unity that made us happy and strong, despite our diverse backrounds. 

    In all our attempts to promote “diversity,” what is missing, Larry?

  16.  Nothing is missing. The United States is a diverse country, and we should not deny that it is. I am pleased with the diversity of my neighborhood, as you are of yours. Thank you.

  17. I believe you are missing the point of the column. No one is denying that the United States is made of of diverse people–the Great Melting Pot. The point is that the Left seeks to use that diversity to divide our nation rather than unite it. That is a fact.

  18. Yes, of course, the results are God’s. And, we know from the words of the Bible that the future of the world is a very bleak one–until the Lord comes back and sets things right.

    I do always pray that God will grant America a reprieve from the slide into a fascist police state that we have been on for many years. It will be a miracle if our course is turned around, at this point. But, we continue to hope, nevertheless!

    Bill Mann gave me your email address today, as he gave you mine. I’ll be in touch with you later, and we can trade war stories. You and your writings come highly recommended by Mr. Mann!

  19.  I have always believed that naturally occurring diversity is a healthy thing; but forced diversity can only lead to destruction. 

  20.  What is missing in today’s attempts at “diversity” is the concept expressed by the motto E Pluribus Unum.  Those promoting diversity rarely, if ever, speak of the need to be “one” in spirit, i.e., united in values and cause.  This diversity, which is closer to racism, doesn’t lead to the wonderfully charming neighborhoods that you and I have known, but instead to the ghettos and burrios and Muslim enclaves like Dearborn where crime, poverty and despair prevail. 

  21.  Hi dr theo !!

    Just curious. Is there any evidence that Dearborn has a higher crime rate, a higher poverty rate, a higher despiair rate or that poverty, crime and despair  prevail more  than in  any other city in America on average ?
    Just curious.

  22. Not to jump in on a question to Dr. Theo, but there is more than enough facts to understand that in diverse communities there are diverse crime and poverty rates. I don’t know if Dearborn is an example of that, but I expect it is.

  23. Maybe we could compare all the “rates” of today to those of Dearborn back in the good old days of the 50s and 60s–you know–before the “invasion.”

  24. Maybe we could compare all the “rates” of today to those of Dearborn back in the good old days of the 50s and 60s–you know–before the “invasion.”

  25.  I completely understand and glad you jumped in—-good to hear from you