“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” – Samuel Adams

Oakland Elementary School Kids Get Gender Confusion Indoctrination

Listen to the author read this article Get Adobe Flash player

Gina Miller

It was a couple of years ago on the limited-syndication radio show of a pseudo-conservative talker out of Tampa that I heard a stunning statement.  Now, I don’t normally listen to this guy, because he poses as a conservative, yet he is hostile to Christianity and traditional family values.  There is no need to mention his name.

The stunning statement did not come from him, but from a fill-in host (whose name I don’t remember) who was on the guy’s show.  The substitute host was on the phone with a caller when the caller said something about the radical homosexual agenda in our nation.  I was astonished to hear this “conservative” fill-in host flatly declare, “What radical homosexual agenda?  There is no such thing.”

I’m sitting there staring at the radio wondering how anyone, especially those purportedly on the Right, cannot see the militant homosexual movement in our nation and understand the danger to our children, and society as a whole, that it represents.  Part of the danger lies in the extreme moral decay that is advancing as the various manifestations of homosexual behavior are given ever-increasing mainstream acceptance in our society.

The most sickening part of the campaign to flood our nation with moral depravity is in the government-run public schools.  I wish I could reach every parent with a child in the public school system to warn him that his child is likely being indoctrinated with not only anti-American, socialist thinking, but also with the doctrines of the church of homosexuality.

If you doubt me, perhaps you would care to take a look at exhibit A: “Redwood Heights Elementary School Gender Diversity Student Presentations, May 23 and 24, 2011.”  I received this information in an email from Elizabeth Swanson, who is a pro-family activist in California.  She sent me an email with several attachments concerning what can only be described as state-mandated child abuse.

The Oakland, California Unified School District is working to indoctrinate children beginning in kindergarten to believe that there are more than two genders.  I have waded through some of the teaching materials, and I can tell you that we have some truly messed-up minds out there.  Those messed-up minds are working overtime to mess up your kid’s mind, as well.

The Oakland school program appears to get most of its material from a nonprofit website called Gender Spectrum.  And, as the name suggests, these people are attempting to perpetuate the delusion that there are more than two genders.  I am not making this up.  These people are deadly serious, and they’re teaching our kids this dangerously sick garbage.

The website provides a “wealth” of resources for schools, teachers and parents.  It was difficult to read the material knowing that I was reading what will be the brainwashed thinking of the youngest generations of our children—unless we put a stop to this evil nonsense which is infecting our school curriculums.

The Redwood Heights Elementary program for May 23rd and 24th was designed by the Gender Spectrum people, and it has a hair-raising outline of “major concepts” and “activities” that are considered “age appropriate” in the twisted thinking of those who created this outrage currently being perpetrated on the school kids in Oakland.

In grades K through 1, the major concepts are “Lots of ways to be boys, girls or both” and “Colors are colors, toys are toys, and clothes are clothes.”  The activities for those little ones are “Boy, girl or both? Which outfit, which hairdo?”  Recommended reading is My Princess Boy (I only wish I were kidding).

In store for children in grades 2 and 3, are major concepts like “Gender diversity in nature” and “Gender biology, expression and identity.”  Fun-filled activities include “Gender, Animals and Nature” and “What is Gender?”  Recommended reading is a book called 10,000 Dresses.

Further upping the ante in grades 4 and 5 are major concepts like “Kids can be boys, girls, both or neither” and “Gender diversity has always existed and occurs in all cultures and societies.”  Oh, yeah?  Well, so has mental illness and demon possession!

4th and 5th graders get to expand their childish horizons with activities including, “Three dimensions of gender” and “Gender and history.”  They’ll be taught to sing along with “All I Want to be is Me.”

Hey, parents!  Are you listening?!  This is what they’re teaching your kids!  These are not only lies; they’re dangerous lies.  Dangerous, how?  This kind of warped indoctrination will only exacerbate the already prolific mental and spiritual problems of members of today’s younger generations, many of whom do not even have the benefit of a traditional moral foundation to fall back on when they are presented with lies from the pit of hell.  They are literally defenseless in the face of such destructive teachings.

Let’s take a brief look at some of the other “teachings” you’ll find on the Gender Spectrum website.  This is the stuff your children are being fed in school, the stuff your kid’s teachers are being forced to teach, and the stuff parents are being “encouraged” to embrace.

From the “Strategies for Re-Thinking and Discussing Gender Issues” page, are these helpful suggestions for parents,

“Ask your child(ren) what they think of as ‘boy’ things or ‘girl’ things, and then ask why they think of those things that way. See if there are things they like which are assigned to the opposite gender and talk to them about how it feels to be told they can’t wear those things or do those things.

Talk to your kids about how everyone is a little different, and while people create these labels, these boxes, to fit people into, most people don’t completely fit into the boxes – and that is OK. Give examples of boys who like sparkly things, girls who like to play with trucks. Try to use yourself and other well-loved family members as examples (e.g. When I was a little girl, people told me I shouldn’t wear red and black even though they were my favorite colors because they weren’t ‘girl’ colors.)

Help advocate for gender-neutral bathrooms for students, parents, and staff. Note: Many public facilities have single-stall restrooms that are often gender marked; these can easily be reassigned as gender-neutral bathrooms or simply labeled ‘Restroom.’ An extension of this ally strategy is to post a sign indicating where to find a gender-neutral restroom at a school site or other public facility.

Mix up gender language when reading stories to your kids – especially with typically male-dominated characters. For example, if the story is about a ‘boy’ animal, mix it up and make the lion a girl. Consider adopting this strategy for the people in a story, too. Mixing up gender language in a story is an ally strategy because you can present gender as a fluid concept by switching up pronouns and behavior expectations. It’s also creative to not have to read a story the same way every time!

Introduce the notion of ‘boy, girl, both, or neither’ as a regular way to talk about people.

Help kids understand that the only thing that is ‘normal’ in our world is variation!”

Elsewhere on the website, they give examples of “supportive” parenting and “damaging” parenting.   As you can imagine, the truth is reversed in this world of tortured logic.  To the degenerate minds of the creators of future generations of homosexual deviants, the “supportive” parents are the ones who do not teach proper moral values and instead welcome with open arms the radical homosexual agenda.

And, of course, the “damaging” parents are the ones who teach traditional moral values and absolutes, including biblical concepts such as the fact that God considers homosexuality to be an abomination.

For parents who object to this wretched program of perverse diversity, the Gender Spectrum people along with the Oakland Unified School District put up the “safety first” banner.  To their way of thinking, the schools simply must teach our little children that perversity is “normal” so that there will be no more bullying.  Yes, they’re actually claiming that in order to foster a “safe” school environment, the logical thing is to teach kids to embrace sick, sinful behavior as being “normal.”

These Gender Spectrum people even contort themselves into logic pretzels when they claim that all this gender garbage teaching has nothing to do with sexuality.  The word homosexuality is nicely avoided in their answer to question number 2 from the “Top 10 Parents Questions” page,

“2. If you tell kids about transgender people, aren’t you discussing sexuality?

The simple answer is no. When we discuss gender, we discuss bodies, what people like to wear, how they present themselves, and the activities they engage in, not sexuality. Sexuality involves physical intimacy and attraction. Gender is about self-identity. Gender identity is a person’s internal sense of where they fit on the gender spectrum. Current research suggests that gender identity is determined in-utero. When we discuss transgender people, we address the incongruence they may experience with their bodies, not issues related to intimacy.”

When you’re living a lie, truth and reality are necessary casualties.

Parents have a major uphill battle to stop this kind of diseased teaching from continuing to be thrust upon our kids in the government-run public school system.  All I can do is keep sounding the alarms and keep praying for our country, and I will as long as God gives me the ability to do so.

Gina Miller, a native of Texas, is a radio commentator and disc jockey. She also works with her husband installing and repairing residential irrigation systems and doing landscaping on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.


Try us out at the new location: American Clarion!


43 Responses to “Oakland Elementary School Kids Get Gender Confusion Indoctrination”

  1. You’d think this stuff is just sick parody if the facts were not in front of us.  How anyone could even conceive 10 years ago that kids at these ages could be indoctrinated into such debauchery is unimaginable.

    Any parent who willfully sends their children to such schools is complicit in child abuse.  I would say that they have already sacrificed their child to Moloch; what worse abomination can be committed?

  2. Spouse, these homosexual indoctrinators are seriously pushing the lie that this is all about “bullying.”  That’s their paper-thin excuse to push this perverse and lying “teaching.”

    I found out today that Mass Resistance and Fox News are also on this story (Fox news segment videos embedded at the link): http://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen/11b/CA_trans_elementary/index.html#Video1

  3. And we in Texas now have an “anti-bullying” law awaiting the Governor’s signature.  It’s appalling what Trojan horses are used to push perversion.

  4. This is an outrage! How dare children be taught to accept others not based on their physical appearance, but instead on their personality and opinions! At this rate they’ll be telling children they can be anything they want to be and to express themselves through creative avenues of their choosing! Don’t these people know that accepting yourself leads to higher self-esteem? I shudder to think that these girls might consider jobs as engineers, or even scientists! And they boys, ugh, they might have sensitive sides and respect women as equals. Disgusting!

  5. Your childish sarcasm, which manages to miss the point (on purpose) is wasted here.  This is not about girls growing up to be engineers or boys respecting women, and you most certainly know it.

  6. No, how dare children be taught falsehoods as “truth.”  This is the diametric opposite of teaching.

  7. What a completely ignorant statement, utterly devoid of acknowledgment of the facts or relevance to the issue at hand.

    One might as well have lamented how horribly damaging it is to children not to encourage them to play with snakes, play in the road or experiment with drugs. After all, such limitations might damage their creativity and self-esteem.

    You are a menace to public safety and the welfare of America’s children.

  8. Oh, right.  There’s no such thing as the “radical homosexual agenda,” and it’s certainly not having any effect on our kids in the public school system, no, none at all…  http://www.wdbj7.com/news/wdbj7-prom-queen-20110527,0,4859749.story

  9. THE BLACK GUY TALKS LIKE HE SWINGS THE OTHER WAY. i GUESS THAT IS WHY THEY ARE DOING THIS CRAP ANY WAY

  10. That’s right, Top686. That guy just declared June to be homo-”pride” month. Wretched. AS IF THERE IS SOMETHING TO BE “PROUD” OF IN BEING A HOMOSEXUAL PERVERT.

  11. You’re right Ken, One ball…. three strikes!

  12. What it comes down to is that people who are sexually messed up find it easier to try to change reality to fit them than to change themselves to fit reality. Plus, it’s a manifestation of the great lie of our generation: that if you can get enough people to believe something, it will magically become true.

  13. What it comes down to is that people who are sexually messed up find it easier to try to change reality to fit them than to change themselves to fit reality. Plus, it’s a manifestation of the great lie of our generation: that if you can get enough people to believe something, it will magically become true.

  14. I first encountered this horrific movement almost twenty years ago when I watched a couple that I know unleash the dark forces of androgyny on their innocent child. I warned them that this was wrong and wasn’t going to end in anything good. But being super-liberals, they simply could not force their child to conform to such a limiting concept as male and female. No, no, no! So while hypocritically spouting forth that they didn’t want to impose the world’s views on their child, they proceeded to mold the child from the tender years into dressing and acting like the opposite sex.

     Surprise! Their young adult offspring is now a full-blown confused individual who has undergone mutililation via surgery to “transition” into a pretension of the opposite sex the parents pushed on their child. Shamelessly, the parents now claim their child was “born this way”. The child doesn’t have a clue as to the parents’ manipulation and social experimentation as being the real cause.

    I reject the current twisting in meaning of the word gender. Gender is part of grammar – masculine, feminine, neuter (which refers to things). It’s plain to see why the perversion crowd has conscripted it as it fits in with their plan to pretend people have a third sex besides male and female – the neuter (which one can fill in the blank with any of the LGBT, etc. alphabet soup of sexual perversions).  

    Has anyone considered that indoctrinating children and teens into this nightmare is sexual harassment of them, as well as child abuse? And that in their zeal to appear cutting edge anyone going along with it is cooperating in this evil movement to ruin children’s innocence and future well-being?

  15. I studied genetics in graduate school. There are in fact more than two sexes. Very few children have xxy, xxyy, and other combinations resulting in biologically intersexed viable healthy human beings who express male and female parts. Also viable are individuals with an xo adaptation that may be androgens biologically. I also studied the bible at a chritian college and can assure you of two things. 1. Jesus does not condemn homosexuals. See mathew 19:1-12; especially the last half where Jesus discusses unichs. 2. The word homosexual is a very new term that was coined in the 1800s. Eunuch was the biblical term for third sex. The word homosexual was added later to cover various terms related to sex or sexual activity and is not found in older translations such as the king James version of the bible. The simple fact is that the idea of a minority sex has existed for a long time. It is a natural part oh human reproduction that about one percent of healthy babies are genetically neither male nor female. This is simply a biological fact.

  16. 1. Matthew 19 has *nothing* to do with homosexuality.
    2. The Greek meaning of “eunuch” is very clearly literally “eunuch.” Besides, the Bible is very clear about homosexuality and about God’s design for sex in other places.
    3. And how many people who are sexually confused mentally *don’t* actually have the chromosomal conditions you reference? Vast enough of a majority to make your genetic argument quite meaningless.

    If all you have are arguments that are either made up of whole cloth or irrelevant, you’re better off keeping silent.

  17. You are extremely mistaken on many fronts. I find it hard to believe that you have been educated on genetics or the Bible. You seem more interested in spreading misinformation than in imparting factual information.

    There are only two sexes: male and female. Anything that cannot be considered one or the other is the result of a birth defect. Do we consider a person born with spina bifida as being born in a normal condition? Do we consider there to be two normal physical conditions: one with the spine inside the body and one outside the body? Of course not. So don’t try to mislead people by implying that there are more than two sexes, or that birth defects are normal or natural when it is quite obvious they are not.

    Further, the incidence of genuine sexual ambiguity is less than 1 percent (somewhere in the neighborhood of 0.003%), and this is usually corrected by a doctor around the time the child is born. I think we’re all smart enough to realize here that the subject of Gina’s article is not the 0.003% of people genuinely born with ambiguous sex organs (most of which are corrected medically), but rather those people who have normal, healthy and functional sex organs but who for whatever reason refuse to accept the reality that stares back at them from between their legs. That reality is this: if you were born with a penis, you are a man; if you were born with a vagina, you are a woman. Again, don’t try to mislead and deceive people.

    You obviously didn’t spend more than about 2.3 seconds studying the Bible at this “Christian” college. Otherwise, you would have noted the multiple condemnations God issues regarding homosexual behavior in both the Old and New Testaments, and that he made it clear that humans sexuality is to be expressed only between a man and a woman in marriage. The description of homosexual sex is clearly outlined in both Old and New Testaments, so don’t lie and claim that God did not condemn this distortion of his design for human sexuality when he clearly did so many times.

    These are the simple facts. You don’t have to like them, but you don’t get to pretend they don’t exist.

  18. Some of the older translations, including King James, use the much more descriptive word “sodomites” for homosexuals.  Are we to believe that sodomite (one who engages in unnatural sex practices) is the same as eunich (one who is rendered physically incapable of sexual activity)?  They are both a “minority sex?”  A “third sex?” 

    You claim that XXY syndrome and 48, XXYY syndrome result in “biologically intersexed viable healthy human beings who express male and female parts.”  That must have been a very interesting genetics course you took in as much as they apparently did not have to rely on facts for their course material.

    Both syndromes you mention produce males with male parts exclusively.  As for being viable and healthy, they are usually hypogonadotrophic, testosterone deficient, infertile and have a wide variety of developmental problems including retardation, autism, depression, seizures, learning disorders, tremors and even orthopedic deformities. 

    It is a biological fact that some people obfuscate and make things up when they have no idea what they are talking about. 

  19. Thanks, Doc.  It’s always nice to have someone in the medical field help set straight these people with heads full of false propaganda that they just regurgitate on queue.  I have been recently reading up on these genetic variations on the sex chromosome and have consistently found the same information that you expounded:  the XXY and 48, XXYY syndromes still result in an unambiguous, biological male – the “Y” being the determining gene factor.

  20. A 46,XY mother who developed as a normal woman underwent spontaneous
    puberty, reached menarche, menstruated regularly, experienced two
    unassisted pregnancies, and gave birth to a 46,XY daughter with complete
    gonadal dysgenesis. — J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jan;93(1):182-9.

    We now describe an SRY-deleted 47,XXY female who has one
    son and two daughters, and one of her daughters has the same 47,XXY
    karyotype. — Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91(1-4):204-7.

    We report an individual having 47, XXY chromosome constitution, normal SRY, SOX9 —
    A 47, XXY female , The Lancet, Volume 352, Issue 9134, Page 1121, 3 October 1998

  21. Meanwhile, people born with penises are still men and people born with vaginas are still women.

  22. None of whom this issue is about.

  23. That’s certainly true of some rank and file homosexuals.

    However, there are plenty of activists who want to flaunt their sexual behavior in public and demand nothing less than the full applause and celebration of society for that behavior.

    Not all homosexuals try to convert heterosexuals, but some do. When it comes to children, many homosexual activists are eager to bring confused young children into the fold because they are impressionable and, as I said, confused about a number of things.

    What school officials, medical officials, parents and others should be doing with confused young people (or older people, for that matter) is helping them to find normalcy and adjust to their normal state of heterosexuality. That is how we are all born to behave–heterosexually. It’s obvious from the design and function of our male and female sex organs.

    There are indeed many problems to be dealt with, and it would be nice if homosexual activists would stop siphoning off so much energy from society in combating their immoral and unhealthy agenda.

  24. That’s certainly true of some rank and file homosexuals.

    However, there are plenty of activists who want to flaunt their sexual behavior in public and demand nothing less than the full applause and celebration of society for that behavior.

    Not all homosexuals try to convert heterosexuals, but some do. When it comes to children, many homosexual activists are eager to bring confused young children into the fold because they are impressionable and, as I said, confused about a number of things.

    What school officials, medical officials, parents and others should be doing with confused young people (or older people, for that matter) is helping them to find normalcy and adjust to their normal state of heterosexuality. That is how we are all born to behave–heterosexually. It’s obvious from the design and function of our male and female sex organs.

    There are indeed many problems to be dealt with, and it would be nice if homosexual activists would stop siphoning off so much energy from society in combating their immoral and unhealthy agenda.

  25. “Oakland Resident,” I don’t suppose you’ve noticed that homosexuals cannot reproduce; they can only recruit. Hmmmmm…

  26. An interesting thing about your post is that you completely miss the actual most common factors that contribute to homosexuality, namely sexual abuse and family dysfunctions. Another interesting thing is that your post is largely made up of technically true statements (with the glaring exception of “some people are born homosexual”) yet still manages to be mostly wrong.

  27. The references that you provide, Zoe, only strengthen oldspouse’s argument that the Y chromosome is the primary determinant of sex.  In each of the cases cited the Y chromosone was impaired structurally or functionally, allowing the X chromosome to dominate.

    I know of no syndromes in which a properly functioning Y chromosome produces anything other than an unambiguous male phenotype.

  28. Wow that is ignorant. First, homosexuals do reproduce all the time. Larry Craig has children. Closeted gay men in families have children. There are probably more gay children when society is repressive to gays because it forces them into traditional families. But more to the point, do you think every child is exactly like their parents? If a child is born artistic, or athletic, or autistic, or whatever, it’s always because their parents are that way? Hmm, have you ever taken a biology class before? Do you know what a “recessive gene” is? Wait, I’m talking to you as if you had an education, never mind… 

  29. I suppose you’re being deliberately obtuse by ignoring what I was saying. The only reproduction going on is heterosexually (outside of turkey baster babies, which also require male and female counterparts to do so).

    Larry Craig had children heterosexually, not homosexually. Homosexuals cannot reproduce with each other, and you know what I meant, but you’re making a pointless argument in a feeble attempt to deny the truth of what I said.

    By the way, get off of my education. You know nothing about me or my education. If you have something worthwhile to add to the discussion, fine, but if you’re going to simply fling juvenile, baseless insults at me, I will not allow you to post comments here.

  30. Wow, are you ignorant, on purpose, I would have to presume.

    No, homosexuals do not reproduce. They only reproduce when they behave as heterosexuals. Homosexual behavior cannot affect reproduction.

    We were created to behave heterosexually. This is obvious in the design and function of the male and female sex organs. Unfortunately, due to childhood traumas, flawed relationships in the home, etc. some children’s perception of proper sex roles and behavior can be damaged and they end up engaging in the dysfunctional behavior of homosexuality.

    Fortunately, if they want to, homosexuals can change their behavior and correct their sexual disorientation. Countless homosexuals have been reverting to normal heterosexual behavior for thousands of years and continue to do so, but one has to want to change before change is possible.

    I realize you’re probably not interested in facts or truth, but thought I’d include this information in the event someone with an open mind comes by.

  31. There is no “scientific consensus” on the cause of homosexual behavior because so many “professionals” have, like the APA in 1973, embraced political correctness over science, common sense and experience.

    What we do know is that childhood environmental factors are almost always related. We also know that even after decades of desperate searching, no “gay gene” has been turned up. We also know that if homosexual behavior was genetic, “twin” studies would reveal virtually 100% of all twins where one was homosexual would find BOTH twins homosexual–and we know that this is not even remotely the case.

    We also know that homosexuals have for thousands of years been changing their behavior to stop behaving homosexually and go on to live heterosexual lives.

    In summary, there is no compelling evidence whatsoever that homosexual behavior is biologically determined, and a wealth of information which points to environmental factors which, like all dysfunctions, can be corrected if the subject wants to change.

    While you obviously dismiss real science when it disagrees with your agenda, it is indeed quite obvious by the design and complimentary function of the male and female sex organs that were created to behave heterosexually. Can you really look at a man’s penis and a man’s anus and logically conclude that they were designed to go together? If you can, you can probably also conclude that a lug nut and a nail were also designed to be joined together in some useful function. Meanwhile, even an elementary examination of the male and female sex organs reveals that it is obvious they were designed to work together in a complimentary and purposeful manner.

    Homosexuals do indeed have rights, and they already have equal rights with everyone else. Sadly, they want special rights and considerations. They want to have their immoral, unnatural and unhealthy behavior applauded as legitimate, normal and healthy when it is none of these things. They also want special protections over and above the same rights everyone else has.

    That is unacceptable in a healthy, mature society. Further, to force homosexual delusions about reality, biology and sexuality on young children is not only wrong, it would have been rightly recognized as criminally abusive to children in a more enlightened age.

  32. Well, women with CAIS have a normal Y chomosome, and you’d have to be pretty thick to describe them as having “an unambiguous male phenotype.”

  33. Well, women with CAIS have a normal Y chomosome, and you’d have to be pretty thick to describe them as having “an unambiguous male phenotype.”

  34. I noticed that, too.  He is more than a little effeminate, isn’t he?

    I remember every single one of my male school administrators being “men’s men.”  You didn’t want to cross them for fear of being pounded into the pavement.  Of course, this was in Texas. 

  35. “Can you really look at a man’s penis and a man’s anus and logically conclude that they were designed to go together?”

    I note that, not all that long ago, anal intercourse was recognized even by non-conservative experts as not being what the body was designed for. Odd how that knowledge got swept under the rug when doing so became politically expedient.

    The “gay is normal” cause has nothing on its side except rationalization, emotional arguments, misrepresentation, popularity, and some woefully inconclusive studies. I prefer to follow where the facts lead, even if a lot of people don’t like it.

  36. You are correct, shaed.  CAIS, or complete androgen insenstivity syndrome, is a problem with cellular receptors to testosterone.  These are genetic males whose bodies do no respond to testosterone.  They develop with female characteristics, but are infertile and have no uterus or ovaries.  They have testicles that produce testosterone but lacking receptors they fail to develop male characteristics. 

    I stand corrected, although one could argue whether a Y chromosome that fails because of faulty target tissues can be considered to be functioning properly.

  37. This is beyond horrific!!! These poor children! Woe unto you Oakland! Woe!!! Isa. 5:20!

    Gina, You should here about the proms up here in CT. I will fill you in later… Let’s just say the Jungle has gone mainstream.

    The Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

    God speed!
    David

  38. Oh, yes, David.

    I’m just thankful that several outlets (including WorldNetDaily) have picked up this evil story.

    Thank you, David! All we can do is stand firm until the end. The rest, the victory, is the Lord’s!

    God bless you, my Brother and Friend!