Is Lawless Obama an Unstoppable Dictator?

Listen to the author read this article

Gina Miller

A few days ago, a couple of the regulars who read and comment on the articles at Dakota Voice got into a discussion on one of the columns’  comment sections.  They were discussing whether or not America has been taken over by a dictatorship.  One of our resident liberals was quick to point out that Barack Obama was elected and therefore could not be considered a dictator.  One of our conservatives coolly countered that Hitler was also elected.

Yes, Obama was elected, and he had a whole lot of votes from dead people, illegal aliens, space aliens and Disney characters.  Voter fraud is a cancer that has truly poisoned our elections, and I don’t know that we will be able to root it out; but, voter identification laws are a good start to taking back our vote, and we should demand them in every state.

I certainly do consider this Obama administration to be dictatorial.  How many more times do we need to see Obama thumb his nose at the Constitution and the rule of law in America for us to understand that he is a man of lawlessness?  There is no need for me to do the laundry list rundown of the outrages wrought by this administration and former Democrat Congress, because you have watched them happen one by one since Obama took office.

However, we know that U.S. administrations and congresses have been steadily walking away from the Constitution for at least a century.  From that terrible year of 1913 that saw the creation of the monster called the Federal Reserve System, to Roosevelt’s New Deal programs of the 1930s, to the massive welfare state explosion of the 1960s, not to mention the countless freedom-robbing regulations enacted over the years, we have watched our federal government grow into the ravenous beast it is today.

President Barack Obama gestures during a fiscal policy meeting in the Roosevelt Room of the White House, April 4, 2011. (Office White House Photo by Pete Souza)

It really is no surprise that all the overreaches of the federal government have combined to bring us to the point that we could now have such a contemptibly lawless man in the White House.  Obama is a logical result of the citizens of America sleeping for a hundred years, while those in power were wide awake, stealing our freedoms and our money at every turn, all “for our own good,” of course!

Of all the despicable actions of this current administration, perhaps one of the most atrocious is the dictatorial legislation of socialized medicine, “Obamacare.”  The communists who crafted it even gave it a deceptive name, as they do for all their wicked legislation: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.  What a load of bunk!

This will be a disaster for our country, if we do not stop it.  How long will people continue trying to implement communistic policies, thinking they will somehow work “this time”?  They don’t work, will never work, and we cannot afford them.

Two of the current attempts by “We the People” to put a stop to this diabolical legislation have landed at the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. This is going to be a travesty of constitutional examination.  We already know the three-judge panel is “in the bag” for Obamacare.  The panel was supposedly selected at random, yet we see that one of the judges is a Clinton appointee, and two of the judges are Obama appointees (what are the odds of that, since this guy has only been in office a little over two years?!).

CNN reports that the judges have indicated their approval of the socialized medicine legislation, so we already know how this sham of a court hearing turns out.  As CNN’s Bill Mears reported Tuesday on their website,

“A federal appeals court panel expressed strong support Tuesday for the sweeping health care reform bill championed by President Barack Obama. It was the first appellate hearing on the law’s constitutionality.

The cases are a certain prelude to eventual Supreme Court review.

Federal district judges in Virginia had earlier issued conflicting rulings on the whether key provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act violate the Constitution, prompting the Richmond-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to now weigh in.

One controversial section known as the ‘individual mandate’ would require most Americans to buy health insurance by 2014 or face financial penalties.

All three judges hearing the case, named to the bench by Democratic presidents, suggested the law is valid, despite objections from the state as well as private groups and individuals.”

CNN calls the “individual mandate” controversial.  Well, I guess you could say unconstitutional legislation by the federal government is a tad “controversial.”  Of course, the Obama administration insists that there is absolutely nothing wrong with this excessive dictate.

As WorldNetDaily’s Bob Unruh reported on Tuesday,

“The acting solicitor general for the United States today claimed in a federal appeals court hearing that Congress has the absolute power to order citizens to purchase consumer goods if lawmakers believe there is a national problem the purchases would address.

So, the federal government believes it has an absolute power to compel us to buy a product.  Isn’t that just swell?!  This is nothing short of dictatorial behavior from this communist administration.

I understand that the ultimate hearing on the constitutionality of Obamacare will be decided by the Supreme Court, but I’m not all that hopeful about the Supremes making the right call here.   In Anthony Kennedy, the Court is one swing vote away from destruction for America’s health care system.  And, when they do finally hear the case, will Obama appointees Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor recuse themselves?  Yeah, right.

The Supreme Court refused a request to fast-track this case.  It is granted that the Court rarely fast-tracks cases, but this is a crucial situation in our nation.  Although this law is clearly unconstitutional, the Court should quickly take up the case and hopefully give an honest ruling, because this legislation is already costing businesses and other entities large sums of money to implement.  The law is currently doing some of the damage it was designed by the communists who wrote it to do.

The Obama administration has every intention of moving forward to impose this noxious legislation on the American people.  The lawless Obama administration does not give a rip about the rule of law or the will of the American people—the majority of whom want nothing to do with the dictatorial Obamacare.  If the Supreme Court were to declare Obamacare unconstitutional, I wonder if this administration would cease and desist its implementation.  Good question.

Yes, Obama is indeed governing like a budding dictator.  We have seen efforts at the state level to put a stop to his lawless administration and the outrageous legislation that came out of the Democrat Congress, but at almost every turn, we are stopped in the courts, or Obama simply ignores the rule of law, as he did when Congress voted in mid-April’s budget compromise to oust some of Obama’s “czars,” and Obama, after signing the budget deal, told Congress to take a hike, because he’s keeping his “czars.”

We have seen the Obama administration’s dictatorial behavior clearly in the wake of state attempts to get control of the illegal alien invasion of the United States.  Arizona and Utah bravely passed state immigration laws only to see them blocked by federal judges.  The Obama administration then sued Arizona to stop the state from doing what the Obama administration won’t do—protect America’s borders.

Now Obama is running around pandering to illegal aliens on his campaign trail!  This guy is absolutely devilish!  His mouth is full of lies!  His purpose is to continue flooding our nation with uneducated, Third-World, illegal aliens who he wants to make “legal,” so they can be a permanent, underclass, Democrat voting bloc.

That’s why his administration is viciously fighting state attempts to put a stop to the illegal alien invasion.  Yes!  We are being invaded as we speak.  It’s been going on for years.  In order to stop the voice of conservatives, who are now wide awake and quite alarmed, the communist Left must dilute our vote with these illegal aliens and all the voter fraud they can muster.

The Obama Justice Department is a peach of an example of lawlessness, which makes a complete mockery of the word “justice.”  They not only refuse to enforce federal immigration laws to protect our borders, they also refuse to defend federal law that rightly defines marriage as between one man and one woman.  They refuse to prosecute black criminals guilty of federal offenses (New Black Panthers, anyone?).  Basically, the Justice Department under Eric Holder acts as the administration’s personal goon squad to sue or otherwise bully anyone who opposes the Obama administration’s policies.

I could on, but I don’t want to retch all over the keyboard.  The case can clearly be made that America is currently languishing under a growing dictatorship of Barack Obama and his buddies.  As bad as things are right now, there is no way Obama should be able to win re-election without massive—I mean massive—voter fraud.  And, if we have a 2012 election and he does not win, do you think he will step down from power?  Don’t laugh.  I’m serious.

Gina Miller, a native of Texas, is a radio commentator and disc jockey. She also works with her husband installing and repairing residential irrigation systems and doing landscaping on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.

17 Responses to “Is Lawless Obama an Unstoppable Dictator?”

  1. A little clarification here: No, Hitler did not beat Hindenburg in 1932. Hindenburg won re-election, but a short time later, Hindenburg appointed Hitler as chancellor, kinda like Obama appointed his “czars.” Did Hitler not “win” subsequent “elections”?

    The point is that sometimes dictators ARE “elected.” Chavez and Ahmadinejad come quickly to mind. Once the power-mad man is in power, getting him to step down and stop his lawlessness is another story.

  2. Gina one of my major concerns is WHERE is Obama getting this disgusting $1,000,000,000 for his “Re-Election” campaign! Is this payback from the Bail-Out money? Is it Up-Front payments for “Guarantee Payments” or Tax-Free promises pending once he wins re-election…. Is this a “small” donation from GE (small change for GE now that they are Tax-Exempt, compliments of the Jihadi-In-Chief)… Or Boeing, Fannie May / Freddie Mac (Oop’s sorry – they only TAKE!!)…

    Let’s look at reality! $1Billion spent wisely could change the lives of so many elderly people in the USA! Or the lives of War Vets!! Yet this CRETIN will blow this unimaginable amount of money just to have himself re-elected and continue his Master’s destruction of the greatest nation under G-d’s Grace and love in the Free World!! His Master’s of course are “Allah” (Satan) and George Soros (One-World – the New World Order – Under Satan!)

    Gina American’s need to ask these questions – Where is this Money coming from????

    Obama = Corruption = Lies & Deceit = Anti-Semitism = Anti-Christ = Hatred for Jews = Hatred for Christians = Islamization of the Free World = The Destruction of Israel = Death of the Chosen People and revealed – his Love for Islam and Jihad!!

  3. Exactly, Alastair!

    Thanks for checking in!

  4. This man has had a good taste of control and will never step down. Oh, he will step down from where he is now but after a good taste of blood… He will want more and more. He finds joy in power even if it is wrong and more especially the wrong thing for Americans.
    Good article my friend.

  5. This is a scary administration, Judy.

    Thank you, as always!

  6. Hopeis only one election away. God I hope that there is someone that can step in and take the bull by the horns. If not it will just as bad as if we get obama another 4 years. 

  7. Yes, Top686, we’re in dire straits. The Lord knows, and he has those of us who hope in Him in His hands. No worries there, even though things are going to get really, really bad before the end.

  8. People have been backing “Smoking Bans” forced upon private business.  I don’t care how much a person is against smoking and doesn’t want to be around it, he/she should be looking at it for what it truly is.  A business owner should be able to decide who to cater to.  If the business owner wishes to cater to “smokers only” that should be the owners right.  Non-smokers, especially ones that would never step foot in the business anyway, should not be able to dictate who is served in a “private business” as long as all is legal.  Furthermore, one of the excuses is to protect the employees.  What about the smoking employees that don’t want to be protected?  My point is, first the state protects people against smoking, then they protect us against food they feel is bad for us.  We do after all need to be protected by the government, since we are all too stupid to avoid smoking establishments if smoking offends us.  Oh, and that is not to mention that when the government starts telling a private business who they will and will not cater to, we have to wonder if there is such a thing as “private business” or if all is now government owned/run and people just “think” they own the business.

  9. My thoughts EXACTLY, Carrie!

  10. Geoge $oros

  11. Geoge $oros

  12. Zero gets away with this stuff because the residents of the world’s largest houses of prostitution (Senate and House of Representatives) are under the control of their money masters.  How else could banks be given $2 trillion and the bill be handed over to the U.S. taxpayer?  Congress did it though, didn’t they?
    Gina, we all wish the Supreme Court would issue a good decision, but I don’t trust them any further than I could throw the U.S.S. New Jersey.  

  13.  Oh, I know, Steve.  We’re in a pretty pickle of our own making–for letting the termites infest the foundation of our country.  We didn’t do any preventative insecticide back in the 60s, so now we have a major infestation.

  14. Just the fact that you are expressing your freedom of
    speech proves he is not a dictator.Example: Democratic Republic of
    Congo. Right now, over 5.4 million people have died in the last 20 years, due to
    the conflict and its aftershocks. It is the most dangerous place to be a woman.
    Most women are raped, and not just raped, but raped with machine guns and broken
    bottles, and in front of their husbands, sons and daughters. It’s the worst
    place to be the world right now, next to Somalia. And it’s happening now.
    We are extremely lucky to be where we are. You have a computer,
    obviously. That’s more than about 95% of the world. Don’t take life for

    Where have you been for the last 20 years I wonder. Obama a dictator for
    himself? Psh. There have been better leaders with more power and authority/ This
    my friend is an Oligarchy. To think otherwise is foolish. That class wishes for
    control. But sorry Obama is just a front man to me. As was Bush. 1 and 2 and
    Clinton and Reagan etc etc. This is another demonizing article created by the right-wing racists scumbags who hate having a black man as president!

  15. It’s convenient to dismiss cogent arguments by branding the person wielding them a “racist,” whether it’s true or not, isn’t it? It keeps you from having to defend the indefensible, and perhaps more importantly, relieves you of the responsibility of thinking, doesn’t it?