“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” – Samuel Adams

Who Will Expose Barack Obama’s Past?

Gina Miller

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States” Article II Section I, Constitution, United States of America

That’s quite a plain and straightforward set of requirements for those seeking to be President–just three little things. You would think we would never have a problem with anyone trying to sneak past these points, but I’m sad to say we do.

One of the grandest myths of the past couple of years is the lie that Barack Obama has proven his eligibility to be President–he has done no such thing, nor has he been called upon to do so by those in authority. The lie that Obama has proven himself is repeated ad nauseam by the mouths of the leftist media and Washington spokesmen. I marvel at the vicious passion they display on this topic.

But, guess what! It’s not just those on the left, but also many on the right, who treat the subject of Obama’s eligibility as kryptonite. I assume they fear being painted as nutjobs, or maybe they fear something worse happening to them. Why? Because the left has waged a massive, blaring campaign to discredit and demean the many millions of Americans who ask the simple question, “Where was Barack Obama born?” It is an amazing thing to see how the left, and some on the right, go into rabid overdrive when this subject is broached.

Barack Obama's certificate of live birth as released by his campaign to Markos Moulitsas of the Daily Kos website. (Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Please don’t repeat the big lie to me that the online image of that computer-generated document proves Obama was born in Hawaii. It does not. Assuming it is a legitimate document, it only proves that Obama was born alive, but it does not establish where he was born, since Hawaii would issue those certifications to babies born outside of the United States. Nor do two newspaper announcements establish where he was born.

If he was born in the United States, why all the secrecy? If he was born in the U.S., it is possible that he renounced his U.S. citizenship at some point, which would nullify his eligibility to be president. At the very least, he would have been born with dual citizenship, as his father was a British subject at the time of Obama’s birth, making Obama Constitutionally ineligible to be president. Understand that I am not claiming to know where Obama was born. I do not know. What I do know is that he is hiding something quite significant.

The media campaign to label as wackos those of us who demand to see proof of Obama’s eligibility is successful to the point that, “Oh, I’m no ‘birther!'” is a common disclaimer out of the the mouths of politicians and pundits on the right who are offering any criticism of Obama’s agenda. Again, I wonder, of what are they afraid?

What about all the judges who have almost uniformly ruled no one “has standing” to bring suit against the Obama administration? There have been numerous lawsuits demanding that Obama prove his Constitutional eligibility to serve as President, and with nearly no exceptions, judges refuse to hear the cases. How can American citizens have “no standing” to bring a case against a potential usurper to our presidency? If we don’t have standing, then who does?

Who is getting to all these judges? I know there are many, many leftist judges in our courts, but not all of them are. Are these judges receiving credible death threats toward themselves or their families? Is this what causes them, almost to a man, to toss out these legitimate lawsuits? It is astonishing and perplexing. The Obama administration has, so far, apparently spent close to two million dollars fighting the release of his pertinent documents.

This is about much more than a copy of an original long-form birth certificate. Unlike our previous presidents, almost none of Obama’s past documentation has been made available to the public. Hidden deep in the cavernous well of mystery of Obama’s past, lie his school records, which include kindergarten, Punahou school, Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard, plus his theses and other articles that would have been written, his medical records, his passport records (which would likely be very revealing), his complete records from his time in the Illinois state senate, his adoption records, his mother’s marriage and divorce records, and his Illinois state bar association records.

His missing college records are important, because they could indicate that he received financial aid as a foreign student. Who did fund his college expenses? Harvard ain’t cheap, you know.

So, this week the video surfaces of Michelle Obama giving her speech in which she casually names Kenya as Obama’s “home country“. This has served to ramp up the debate, and I’m wondering why this video is popping up just now, when that speech was given back in 2008.

Massive credit must be given to Joseph Farah and the hardworking staff at World Net Daily for their bold and tireless efforts to get to the bottom of the Obama nativity story. They have done all the heavy lifting and research and have taken harsh arrows of derision from the left and many on the right for keeping this issue alive. But, they’re not going to drop it, and I commend them.

Glenn Beck, Andrew Breitbart and Bill O’Reilly come to mind as those on the “conservative” side who suddenly sound like they’re on MSNBC when it comes to the Obama eligibility subject. The common argument is that there are so many other, more important, issues for which to criticize the Obama administration without having to go to that “stupid birther” topic. Allow me to point out the obvious and the bottom line here. If Obama actually is Constitutionally ineligible to serve as President of the United States, then every single decree, piece of congressional legislation and executive order that has crossed Obama’s desk since January 20, 2009 is null and void. His entire presidency is invalidated, and he should stand trial for his crimes against our country.

I’m certainly not holding my breath here for the truth to be manifest. But now, each day brings new, horrifying revelations about what is in this hellish Obamacare legislation. Our chances of defeating it in the courts are daunting. If only the truth about Obama’s past were brought to light, Obamacare would be negated.

Do those in power on the right fear riots in the streets if Obama is exposed as the fraud so many of us suspect he is? I don’t know, and I don’t really care what they fear. I don’t care who wants to label me as a nutcase for demanding that the Constitution be upheld. If we don’t stand up for the Constitution, it will be buried by the communists who currently run our government. They are going to ram through every abominable, anti-Constitutional piece of legislation they can get their dirty hands on before the November elections.

Those of us who smell a big, fat rat in Obama’s past must not fear being labeled crazy for speaking out against this potential usurper of our presidency–labeling us wacky is the best they can do instead of revealing the truth about Obama. Now, more than ever, we must turn up the heat, turn up the volume on demanding this man prove to our nation that he is legally occupying the White House. There is nothing crazy about insisting that our precious Constitution be upheld. Don’t back down or be afraid to speak your mind on this paramount subject, my friends!

Mr. Obama, where’s the birth certificate?

Gina Miller, a native of Texas, is a radio disc jockey. She also works with her husband installing and repairing residential irrigation systems and doing landscaping on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.


Try us out at the new location: American Clarion!


94 Responses to “Who Will Expose Barack Obama’s Past?”

  1. That his parents were actually Sarek and Amanda, of course.

  2. So, if Obama has nothing to hide, why does he spend a fortune in legal fees to keep anyone from seeing his original birth certificate?

    Another lie put out by whirled nuts daily.

    The president has not spent any money on this nonsense.

  3. It is really hard to believe that any concern about the validity of Obama birth certificate or Certification of Live Birth hasn't been address by the State of Hawaii.

    It is really hard to believe that the authenticity of Obama birth certificate or Certification of Live Birth hasn't been check by legal authorities.

    It is really hard to believe that in the light of the various political scandals that if there was any that could disprove Obama's birth certificate or Certification of Live Birth that it wouldn't come forward.

    It is really hard to believe that Clinton would have used Michigan/Florida if there was something more dambing to damage Obama's presidential candidacy.

    More and more it seems that those who argue against Obama's birth certificate authenticity have a perception of a reality that is different than this one.

  4. Well, Phillip Berg, Orly Taitz, Leo Donofrio and some others who have filed suit are also lawyers. They also rely on logic, facts and law. Logic, the facts, and the law–the Constitution–are all enemies to Obama. These lawyers have plenty of valid arguments that need answering.

    In all of this, the only thing you liberals point to as the complete and entirely conclusive proof of Obama's certain American citizenship is a COMPUTER-GENERATED ONLINE IMAGE and a couple of newspaper clippings. It really doesn't take much for you guys, does it? You don't give a flip whether Obama is a constitutionally eligible man to hold that office or not. He may very well have been born in Hawaii, BUT there are several ways that he may not hold U.S. natural-born citizenship status. You all don't want to think about those troublesome problems of dual citizenships or renounced American citizenship possibly getting in the way of your “logic.”

    There are a thousand holes in Obama's story, and you all know it. Well, maybe you don't know it, because you have covered your eyes and plugged your ears. But, that's okay–our eyes and ears are open and will remain that way as long as we're still here.

  5. WXRGina: “In all of this, the only thing you liberals point to as the complete and entirely conclusive proof of Obama's certain American citizenship is a COMPUTER-GENERATED ONLINE IMAGE and a couple of newspaper clippings. It really doesn't take much for you guys, does it?”

    Well, my only question is what do you have that says he wasn't born in Hawaii? A couple of headlines without any supporting facts. A couple of forged Kenyan birth certificates. If I'm looking at both sides of the arguments, which is offering the best evidence? Which is offering only theories and claiming that if he doesn't show something that has nothing to do with the question at hand it must mean he's hiding something (which is a terrible way to treat anybody). You have the most powerful tool available to you, the American people, all you have to do is come up with real evidence and not made-up theories and you can bet Congress would listen and impeach Obama.

    You like to say “Where's the Birth Certificate?”

    I say to you “Where's your evidence?”

  6. Gina: “At the very least, he would have been born with dual citizenship, as his father was a British subject at the time of Obama’s birth, making Obama Constitutionally ineligible to be president.”

    I'm confused, where in the constitution does it say that?

  7. Where have you been the past two years? When he was adopted he took the name Barry Soetoro. He attended school in his early years using that name. Since all of his records have been sealed, no one knows if he leaglly changed it back. While he was at Occidental College in Calif., hHe was known as Barry Obama.

    A registration document, made available Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia, shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro. On the registration it lists his mane as Barry Soetoro, His religion as Islam and his nationality as Indonesian.

    The associated press took the photo of the registration. Do you need any more proof than that? That is just one document that showed he was a citizen of Indonesia. How many more are out there that have been sealed by Obama’s lawyers? If he has documents showing he is an Indonesian citizen, is it not a possibility that he also obtained an Indonesian passport to travel to an area where Americans were not welcome? I don’t think it is that far of a stretch to come to that conclusion. A second passport doesn’t make sense unless you know the facts.

  8. ,blockquote> Most likely he has a passport showing he is a citizen of another country. Forcing him to show his passport showing his U S citizenship should show proof he went to Pakistan in the 80's.

    Why would he have had a passport from another country?

    That makes no sense whatsoever.

    Most likely he has a passport showing he is a citizen of another country. Forcing him to show his passport showing his U S citizenship should show proof he went to Pakistan in the 80's.

    He has only had one legal name, Barack Hussein Obama.

  9. He has probably accepted money for college by applying as a foreign student.

    Do you have any proof of this?

    No.

  10. And I was born one year to the day before the President and my birth certificate from Pennsylvania looks almost exactly like his. I've used it to obtain employment, renew my passport, and get a driver's license, too.

  11. Berg, Orly Taitz et al. have an unblemished record of losing. Your explanation is a complex conspiracy of threats and intimidation against federal judges who routinely deal with drug dealers, the mob, etc, have life tenure, but are supposedly being controlled by Obama. The conspiracy apparently extends to control of the Indiana state courts, which rules against birthers.

    Let me ask you this: do you think unelected judges should have the authority to remove a sitting President from office? If so, where in the Constitution do you find that authority. By my reading, the Constitution provides one, exclusive means of removing a sitting President: impeachment in the House, followed by trial and conviction in the Senate. If you think Obama violated laws in becoming President, then ask your representative to introduce articles of impeachment. I don't understand why birthers want to give unelected federal judges the authority to invalidate military deployment orders or unseat a President. Is that really a precedent you want to set?

  12. Please explain why any “records” other than proof of his birth in Honolulu, Hawai’i on August 4, 1961 would be relevant to his eligibility for office.

    And I’m still waiting for your evidence that every prior President has provided a birth certificate for the American public to peruse prior to the election. I’ve researched this, and I can’t find evidence of ANY prior President being asked for, or offering, such proof. So I guess the prior 43 white male Presidents set the precedent of “flipping the ‘bird’ to our Constitution,” didn’t they?

  13. It doesn’t. Never has. All that is required is birth on American soil, as confirmed recently by the appeals court in the Ankeny case.

  14. Gina, a Court of law has determined the following:

    Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.

    There is nothing that you can do about that.

  15. All I asked was where in the constitution it states that the President can’t have dual citizenship. You brought it up. Now please back it up or retract it. That’s all.

  16. Jim, where’s our evidence? That is precisely what we are demanding! We have many, many unanswered questions,

    Gina, a couple of things.

    First, that is not what Jim asked, he asked where is the support for your claim in the constitution.

    It is not the President’s job to read the Constitution to you.

    Further, you seem to want to shift the burden of proof to the President. These are your claims, you have to support them.

    That is totally opposite the way our legal system works. It is not your prerogative to change a legal concept that has been the cornerstone of American jurisprudence since the founding of this country.

  17. Chester, standing is not a technicality, it is a vital and important part of our legal system.

  18. *deep sigh*

    Jim, where's our evidence? That is precisely what we are demanding! We have many, many unanswered questions, some of which were brought about by Obama himself telling stories of living in and visiting foreign countries where he apparently had a citizenship other than that of the United States (Indonesia? Pakistan? Dual Brititsh-United States?). A dual citizen at birth would not be a “natural born” citizen, Jim.

    None of you want to address these international citizenship questions. I'm only repeating myself here, but his passport records, college financial aid, and his adoption records would go a long way in establishing the true identity of Barry Soetoro.

    “Where's the birth certificate?” is our slogan that sums up our demand for a whole heck of a lot more than a just birth certificate.

  19. He was not adopted by his step-father. His father was still living at the time his mother was married to Lolo and would have had to give up parental rights in order for him to have been adopted and his father didn’t do that. In his book “Dreams of My Father”, President Obama talks about how his step-father already had him registered for school when he and his mother arrived in Indonesia. I’m sure it was probably easier to register him the way his step-father did – due to the political climate, customs and the like- but it doesn’t matter- a parent or step-parent cannot do away with or affect a child’s US citizenship. Period. End of story.

    We know his father came to visit him in Hawaii after he returned from Indonesia. He was a small boy when he first went to Indonesia so you can’t hold him responsible for what his step-father wrote down. Plus, he went to school for two years in the local school where Islam was taught and went to school for two years in a Catholic school in Indonesia. He was a still young boy when he returned to Hawaii at ten years old.

    Contrary to birther claims that he could not have traveled to Pakistan on an American passport, that is a false claim. The US state department and the Pakistani Embassy have verified Americans traveling on American passports were welcome in 1981, the year the president traveled there. Verify it yourself. Check with the state department. Don’t rely on bogus rumors. I didn’t.

    BTW, I sometimes used my second married name for my children just because it was easier for some things. For legal documents in this country, I used their legal name. Barack Obama would have had to already have an American passport to travel to Indonesia when he first went at six years of age. In his real name, given to him at birth in Honolulu, Hawaii.

  20. Gina

    You may or may not be right about Obama. But if you are waiting for birth certificates, financial aid records, adoption records, transcripts etc. , you might as well get in line behind those who are waiting for the government to release its records on revealing the facts they have about aliens and flying saucers flying over and landing on earth.

    Neither one of these groups will ever get any records, whether the events happened or not.

  21. Brian, you know I'm not holding my breath. I wrote this article posing a rhetorical question, “Who will expose Obama's past?” I have no answer to this.

    The machine surrounding Obama is a powerful one. This world is laced with powers we cannot see and cannot fathom. We still don't know who killed Kennedy and how those twin towers and building 7 so perfectly imploded, like a controlled demolition. There are many things we will not know this side of eternity.

    I will say one thing, though. If Obama ever outlives his usefulness to his handlers, he will be exposed in a New York minute.

    These few babblers that are spamming on this comment section right now are just trying to shout down the millions of us who question this shadow man in the White House. It's that simple. We are asking who this man is, and we're not going to stop asking, even though we may not be able to penetrate the walls of the machine.

    With these several guys here working overtime with their spamming, it's good to see you here instead, Brian. Who would think I would ever appreciate your counter-arguments? But I do! :-D

  22. 1. NO record is relevant except the President's birth certificate, which he already released, and which has been confirmed by officials of the Hawaiian government, two contemporary newspaper notices, and a contemporary letter mentioning his uniquely-named mother having a child in Honolulu on the correct date.

    2. No other President has ever provided a birth certificate, college records, passport records, school records, parents' marital records, or any of the long, long list of irrelevant material birthers demand. NONE. The MOST that has ever been provided is health records, and that only within the last few years (or, why it was such a shock when Kennedy's medical records were released and it turns out that the poor man was a walking pharmacy thanks to Addison's disease, a bad back, and his war injuries).

    3. Unfortunately, birthers are so blinded by their hatred for the President that they won't listen to reason, and will of course impugn my patriotism because I've had the audacity to point this out…..

  23. Gina,

    While I do think the birthers stance is wrong and counterproductive, I keep going back to the subject I love the most-scientific research and it's history. While I am not a scientist, the history of scientific research is replete with people making….well shall we say making unusual claims… and shouted down by those in the status quo. Lo and behold, they turn out to be right and a whole new field of science pops up. This happened with evolution( sorry Bob, couldn't help it :-) ).

    You have every right to keep asking questions

  24. HA HA HA!! That's funny, Brian! We could now change the subject on this thread to arguing about the THEORY of evolution and how utterly bankrupt it is!

    Wouldn't THAT be a hoot?!!

    Thank you for the levity (though I know you didn't mean it to be. HA!)
    :-)

  25. Your Country is being destroyed right under your nose, and you don't even see it!

    When you and your ilk are running things, think Detriot, New Orleans, etc.

    You poor deluded souls. I will pray for your enlightenment.

  26. Here is a quote from Michelle Obama to the API. “African Press International is supposed to support Africans and African-American view,” she reportedly said. “It is strange that API has chosen to support the racists against my husband. There is no shame in being adopted by a stepfather.

    Are you calling his wife a liar?

    Why don't we find out who the liar is? Obama made a speech in Selma Alabama. He claimed his father was a goat herder. Actually his father was a privileged, well educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan government. That statement that he was a goat herder, would be like my daughter telling everyone her father was a grass cutter. Yes I was a grass cutter, but that was when I was a kid growing up. That was not my profession when I graduated from school. He claimed to be a Professor Of Law. He was actually a senior ledturer on leave. He claimed to be a Constitutional Lawyer. He was actually a senior lecturer on leave. He has been caught in lie after lie and stretching the truth to it's limit and most of you people refuse to listen.

    Since all of you non believers require proof of everything, Where is your proof Obama had an American passport at the age of six? Where is your proof that it is in the name on his Hawaii birth certificate?

  27. Attn.: Antibirther.

    RE: “standing is not a technicality, it is a vital and important part of our legal system. “

    I am well aware what the Standing Doctrine is. I used a shortcut in my sentence which was misleading – you are right about that. However, that did not change the meaning of what I said.

    It is an important part of all countries legal system – otherwise the courts would be overburdened. Nevertheless, this issue is of utmost national importance – it is not a just a trivial issue burdening the courts.

    The Standing Doctrine is so wide that it is very easy for the judges to use it arbitrarily, and practice unpunished “dereliction of duty” as Alen Keyes puts it (avoiding ruling on merit). This practice makes the constitution unenforceable. Unenforceable constitutions are typical of banana republics. The Judicial Branch is making the US the largest banana republic of all.

  28. This should fire up the Obamatons.

    WND digs up NPR 2008 archives describing Obama as “Kenyan-born.”

    “Those crazy “birthers” are citing National Public Radio. Really? NPR?” -Bob Unruh

    Yes, plus the Nigerian Observer, the Sunday Standard, African Travel Magazine, and others.

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageI

    And the beat goes on…

  29. Agreed. American law and jurisprudence has ALWAYS held that it is the job of the accused to prove his/her case. Always. Some states don't even allow reciprocal discovery in criminal cases so that the defense can prepare an adequate defense.

    What that means is that BY LAW, you and your fellow birthers are the ones who must provide evidence of fraud, wrongdoing, or forgery by the President. He doesn't have to prove anything. His production of his birth certificate was more than sufficient to satisfy any court of law in this country, and your insistence that he turn over stacks of documents that have no bearing on his eligibility is not only ridiculous, but flies in the face of every principle of American and British law.

    Frankly, you birthers should be ashamed to call yourselves patriots when you advocate such a breach of American law and custom.

  30. He also would not have been eligible for such scholarships since he was born in Hawaii and spent all but a few years of his youth there.

  31. 2. Adoption of a child by a stepparent requires that the biological parent waive his/her citizenship rights. Barack Obama Sr. did not do this. Therefore it is not possible for Lolo Soetoro to have adopted the President. That you think otherwise only shows your profound ignorance of the American legal system.

    3. There is no law against an adoptee becoming President of the United States, so even if the President somehow HAD been adopted, so what?

    4. There is no law against a Muslim becoming President, or a Mormon, or a Catholic, or an atheist, or a Hindu, or a Unitarian Universalist. Even if the President was registered as a Muslim by his father, so what?

    5. There is no law against the President, or anyone else, using more than one name. We’ve already had two (2) Presidents who used something other than their birth names while in office (Dwight Eisenhower, who switched the order of his names, and Gerald Ford, who was born Leslie King Jr.).

    6. Even if the President was adopted, and a Muslim, and formerly used “Barry Soetoro” as his name, THE DOCUMENT YOU QUOTE CLEARLY LISTS HIM AS BEING BORN IN HONOLULU. That right there makes him a natural born citizen, and thus eligible to be President.

    Honestly. The sheer, blinding level of stupidity in birther posts would be funny if it weren’t so tragic.

  32. You have provided no proof of anything except your own bigotry, bad manners, and gullibility. Revolting.

  33. You're forgetting a few facts:

    1. Parents cannot renounce their children's citizenship. Period. End of statement. Stanley Dunham could not possibly have done so for her son, nor had she any reason to do so SINCE SHE DIDN'T RENOUNCE HER OWN CITIZENSHIP IN THE FIRST PLACE.

  34. Please note that over seventy lawsuits have been brought challenging the President's citizenship and eligibility. To date, ALL OF THEM HAVE BEEN DISMISSED.

  35. Yes it is bright as day. We must make sure that people like the birthers do continue to spread their misinformation.

  36. Attn.: Gina & Antibirther

    RE: Antibirther 04/08/2010 02:36 PM “Gina, a Court of law has determined the following: Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. There is nothing that you can do about that. “

    Yes she can. She can say that your statement is incorrect. Please see:

    Excerpt from: (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=134881) :

    “Regardless, the holding in Wong Kim Ark did not state that such a citizen was “natural born.” In fact, Justice Gray reiterated the definition of natural born citizen as one born on United States soil to parents who are citizens when he favorably discussed Minor v. Happersett… “

  37. Gina, the comment section under your “Evil Tyrant” article is closed, so I thought I'd answer your last posting to me here … this will be my last.

    Thanks for attaching your other articles. I initially thought that maybe you were just using hyperbole in suggesting that President Obama may be the son of Satan. Now I know – to my utter dismay – that you LITERALLY believe that he is the Antichrist and that Democrats are “led by the demonic forces of hell.” Of course that renders any discussion of politics irrelevant. If I believed that, I wouldn't have any need for further discussion either. What would be the point?

    Before I go though … I must say how astoundingly presumptuous and arrogant it is of you to believe that you have the divine ability to discover this all-important truth. Has God leaned over and whispered these truths into Gina's ears? It's either that or Barack Obama is specifically identified in the Bible somewhere as the Antichrist and the rest of us have simply missed it. If so, please site me verse and chapter … for I certainly don't want to vote for the Antichrist next time around. And what's to keep others from determining that George Bush or Sarah Palin or Hillary Clinton … or insert anyone you want <here> is the Antichrist? I mean … unless you also claim to be a prophet, there is no way that you can know these things that you claim to know. Do you not see the danger in that? Does it not seem even the least bit odd to you that God just happens to agree with you and other conservatives on all of the various and transitory political issues of the day? Does it not cross your mind that just maybe you are the one being used …. by the Republican party, which is led by the demonic forces of hell? Do you not see that the ultimate irony – and cruel joke – may be that Satan is actually working through YOU instead?

    Maybe you need to humble yourself Gina, TRULY open your heart to the Lord, and discover that He is not speaking through you and he is not taking sides in American politics as you so desire. And if you don't see that truth …. you might as well start taking your talking points from Osama bin Laden … for he's perfected your argument and has succeeded in inciting others to destroy America.

  38. John, where do you get this idea that I believe Obama is THE Antichrist? Nowhere have I claimed Obama is THE Antichrist–nowhere. “Antichrist” forces are active in the world, and have been, since the dawn of time, but I have made no such claim of Obama being THE ONE–“The Man of Perdition.” NOWHERE have I claimed this. The devil has many, many sons, but calling someone a son of the devil is not the same as proclaiming he is “THE Antichrist.”

    You completely misunderstand my words. I believe you may be unable to perceive them properly. You have these bizarre notions that I think I'm “channeling” God's will or something. You are so far off-base that I really cannot help you to actually see what I meant in my “Open Letter” article.

    You will not succeed in twisting my words. You can try all you want to make it sound like I'm saying something I'm not, but that open letter has spread like wildfire across our country, and even across the world, and people LOVE it and know EXACTLY what I mean. I'm sorry you are unable or unwilling to SEE.

  39. Thanks for your non-responsive response Gina. I guess I really didn't expect an answer to my legitimate questions. At least I'll sleep easier knowing that President Obama is ONLY the devil's son. Sorry .. all I can muster anymore is sarcasm .. anymore knocking of this ole' noggin' against the nearest wall will render me silly and useless.

    Congratulations on your article going viral all over the world. That doesn't surprise me .. Osama bin Laden's message went viral too. I think virus is an apt term for how such twisted thinking can infect these two great religions. Maybe you can have it out with him in the afterlife as to who really did more to destroy America.

  40. What on earth are you even talking about?

    Against my better judgment, knowing it would be futile, I've answered your questions anyway. Like I said, I don't believe you can even understand a word I'm saying. Or, you're just jerking around by repeating, “you don't answer my questions.” That's a crock, John, and we all know it.

    There's nothing more I will say to you. I've already wasted too much time feeding the trolls on this thread.

  41. Ditto.

  42. All I have to say is thanks for the entertainment!! I learned a long time ago that you can never win an argument with stupid people. They will beat you with experience. I print these blogs out and share with my co-workers.. forget Jerry Springer, this freak parade will entertain for hours.. Hey guess what.. Obama is president (Period) you loose. But I am sure Obama himself pulled your ballot out of the box because he's Muslim and out to get you! Watch out!

  43. Your rhetorical skills are very impressive! If I were back in junior high school, I might possibly admire you very much.

    Too bad we're all grown up now, so the old, “My dad can beat up your dad!” or, “Takes one to know one!!” and, “I know you are, but what am I?!” just don't cut it as a substitute for intelligent points.