“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” – Samuel Adams

More Than 30 States Consider Personhood for the Unborn

imagesbannerscp_120x1201Reprinted by permission of the Christian Post

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter

Three additional states have taken up the “personhood” cause in a push to guarantee the constitutional rights of the preborn.

Iowa, Virginia and Kansas are now among more than 30 states pursuing personhood amendments – a move pro-lifers view as their best chance of ending abortion in the U.S.

“Personhood is a revolution of the pro-life movement,” said Keith Mason, co-founder of Personhood USA, in a statement. “It challenges what’s been done in the past, stimulates the movement’s present, and eradicates the need for pro-life efforts in the future. Personhood is the best hope to end abortion in America.”

In Kansas, a new pro-life organization – Personhood Kansas – is currently collecting petition signatures to push the state legislature to pass a personhood amendment. The petition is being passed around and promoted among Christians and other pro-lifers across the state.

“As a movement, we know what our goal is: to have all children in the womb protected by love and by law,” states Personhood Kansas. “It is important that we learn the lessons of history and rely on the moral clarity of our God-given moral law to guide our efforts not on demoralizing legal and moral subterfuge.”

Language in each state amendment differs slightly but they generally state that personhood applies to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development and provide that persons, including unborn children, enjoy the right to life as guaranteed by the federal and state constitutions.

Thomas More Law Center attorney Robert Muise says pro-lifers should make personhood their main strategy. Whatever efforts went in to passing the 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act should be doubled for the personhood movement, Muise said at a recent Washington, D.C., conference, held around the anniversary of Roe v. Wade.

Though the 2003 ban was praiseworthy, partial-birth abortions – performed after the 18th week of pregnancy – account for only a small portion of total abortions. Muise pointed out that nearly 90 percent of all abortions occur in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

Some religious and pro-life groups have opposed recent efforts to move forward with personhood amendments, saying the time isn’t right or that such measures could prompt a “super abortion right,” Muise noted.

But Muise says the time is now to push their efforts.

Pro-lifers can’t wait on a pro-life administration in the White House or Congress. They’ve already “been there, done that” with George W. Bush. Despite his pro-life agenda, abortions were ongoing.

Also, the current makeup of the Supreme Court is leaning in favor of the pro-life movement, Muise noted. If they wait any longer, more justices appointed by President Obama who will likely be pro-abortion will be seated on the high court.

“It is always the right time to do the right thing,” Muise maintained.

Copyright 2009 The Christian Post. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.


  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Share/Bookmark

View Comments to “More Than 30 States Consider Personhood for the Unborn”

  1. Linked to your post from my blog Wayne's Discernment … I plan to use this information in some upcoming exposes I will have on my site.

  2. Thanks, Wayne!

  3. Seems like they are still left with claiming to know when life begins when simply substituting 'personhood' for 'living being'.One could argue that Genesis 2:7 answers that when it states that Adam became a living being when God breathed life into his nostrils. He then and only then became a living soul.

    Concrete literalists would say then that a baby's soul and life begin when the first breath is taken and others will say that breath really means ' spark of life' which could be at conception.Others might even claim that since Adam was never a embryo that is fine to say his life began with a 'first breath'.

    Jeremiah 1:5 and Psalms139:13,16( and some other verses) make much more vague references, but only Genesis specifically mentions a non-alive body coming to life
    and that happened with a first breath

  4. That's a pretty thorough Biblical analysis. My commendations.

    I think it's pretty clear that, since Adam was never an embryo (as they say in creation science, he was “created with the appearance of age”), Adam was not alive until God first breathed life into him.

    One might argue also that, since we (a) know that babies are alive and can live outside the womb well before the 9th month of normal birth, and (b) since babies get the oxygen they need from their mother through the umbilical cord, just as the get the nutrition they need from their mother through the umbilical cord, that (c) they already have the “breath of life” in them very early on.

    So even the “breath of life” issue doesn't seem to be an obstacle to a reasoned defense of unborn human life.

  5. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by DakotaVoice and south_dakotaBNN, Not Abortion. Not Abortion said: More Than 30 States Consider Personhood for the Unborn http://bit.ly/dqVm33 #abortion #prolife [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus