Archaeologist Discover House from Jesus’ Time in Nazareth

imagesbannerscp_120x1201Reprinted by permission of the Christian Post

By Ethan Cole|Christian Post Reporter

Excavators for the first time have found the remains of a home from the time of Jesus in Nazareth, Israel’s Antiquities Authority announced Monday.

Up until now, archaeologists only found tombs but not remains of homes from the time of Jesus in Nazareth, where he spent most of his life. Archaeologists, however, did not draw any direct connection between the home and Jesus. Rather, the building sheds light on the environment that Jesus likely grew up in.

Nazareth (Source: Wikimedia Commons)“It reveals for the very first time a house from the Jewish village of Nazareth and thereby sheds light on the way of life at the time of Jesus,” commented Yardenna Alexandre, excavation director at the Israel Antiquities Authority.

Excavators began working on the dwelling in the summer, but weren’t sure the building was from the time of Jesus until this month.

Alexandre said the building is “small” and “modest,” and probably typical of the dwellings in Nazareth at the time.

Remains from the building consisted of two rooms and a courtyard where a cistern collected rainwater to be used in the house. There were few artifacts recovered from inside the building, but fragments of pottery from the Early Roman period were found.

The discovery of the dwelling together with other tombs found in the areas suggested that Nazareth was a rural small village of about 50 houses on about four acres. Alexandre also noted that residents of Nazareth were Jews of modest means based on the clay and chalk shards found in the building. There were no remains of glass vessels or imported products, which suggested the inhabitants were “simple.”

The remains of the building were found near the Church of Annunciation, where many Catholics believe the Angel Gabriel told Mary she would conceive a child that is the Son of God.

The site will be preserved as part of a new Christian center that will be built nearby.

Copyright 2009 The Christian Post. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • dcm
    Lately I've been hearing a lot of people make the remarkably uninformed claim that "Jesus never existed." I guess they figure that makes for an easier way out than trying to cast him as a "mere man" given what he did. Plus they already have to ignore a lot of history & other fact to believe the things they do, so why not ignore a little more and deny Jesus as well?

    As if a personality cult could rise up around a non-existent person supposedly from a specific time & place (one in which, BTW, everyone would have known what everyone else was doing) and fool people from that same time & place so thoroughly that the effects would spread all over the world for millennia? Or, as if the people who spread the story would die for the sake of something they knew wasn't real? (BTW, I've heard that argument dismissed as a "tired old one" by people who, as it happens, have no actual way of countering it!)
  • Good points, DCM. I have read that there is more extra-biblical evidence for Jesus of Nazareth than there is for Julius Ceasar. Only someone wholly ignorant of history could make the claim that Jesus never existed but, as you point out, their interest is in denying Jesus' divinity more than the historical Jesus.

    There has never been an archeological finding that shows Bible history to be in error, though there have been some that seemed to until further discoveries in fact verified Biblical accounts. You'd think that a book full of mythologic tales and metaphor could be easily refuted by the archeological evidence, wouldn't you?
blog comments powered by Disqus