“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” – Samuel Adams

Leaders Worldwide Call for Probe into Leaked Global Warming Emails

Bigfoot

Bigfoot

Fox News reports Senator James Inhofe is calling for a probe into the global warming fraud emails and documents which came to light last week.

Republican lawmaker is calling for an investigation into whether a U.N. panel “cooked the science” on climate change following the publication of more than 1,000 private e-mails that global warming skeptics say proves the threat is overstated.

Sen. James Inhofe, the top Republican on the Environment and Public Works Committee, told the Washington Times in a radio interview Monday that he will press for a probe into whether the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “cooked the science to make this thing look as if the science was settled, when all the time of course we knew it was not.”

“This thing is serious, you think about the literally millions of dollars that have been thrown away on some of this stuff that they came out with,” the Oklahoma Republican said.

Some lawmakers are already looking into the apparent scientific fraud revealed in these documents.

The UK Guardian also reports British leaders are calling for an investigation over these revelations, as does Newsmax.  The Daily Mail reports there are calls that one of the “scientists” implicated in the scandal should resign from the Climate Research Unit (though it appears the fraud is systemic and institutional, rather than the work of one man).

The U.S. House has already passed a cap and trade global warming tax that the Senate is now considering.  Also, many socialists around the world and here in the United States want to hamstring our country in a UN climate treaty next month.  Not only millions of dollars but our very freedom is on the line from the threat posed by this hoax.

Terry Hurlbut at the Essex County Conservative Examiner has an interesting theory about who leaked the global warming fraud emails and documents last week.

The anonymous tipster, whom many people initially assumed had “hacked” into the computers at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia (repeatedly called the “Hadley CRU,” by mistake), might in fact be a CRU insider who released the files for his own reasons.

The user, known only as “FOIA” (which now appears to be a reference to the British equivalent of the US Freedom of Information Act), left only one comment on The Air Vent to announce his release of his 61-MB ZIP archive. He has never been heard from since, nor has anyone stepped forward claiming to be that person since the story became widely known.

Persons knowledgeable in information security hold that this is not the behavior of a hacker. A hacker normally boasts of his act, even if he were hired or otherwise suborned to commit his act by someone else. These two reports provide illustrations of such behavior.

Speaking of a Freedom of Information Act request for data from these hoaxers, it would appear these socialist “scientists” were ready to destroy information rather than turn it over to the requester.

From the Washington Times:

There is a lot of damning evidence about these researchers concealing information that counters their bias. In another exchange, Mr. Jones told Mr. Mann: “If they ever hear there is a Freedom of Information Act now in the UK, I think I’ll delete the file rather than send to anyone” and, “We also have a data protection act, which I will hide behind.” Mr. Jones further urged Mr. Mann to join him in deleting e-mail exchanges about the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) controversial assessment report (ARA): “Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re [the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report]?”

And there are more such calls for the deletion of information, rather than allow it to fall into the hands of nonbelievers.

Apostles of the Religion of Anthropogenic Global Warming are trying to ignore this bombshell where possible, and to spin it as meaning nothing, just “poorly chosen words” said “in the heat of the moment.” Uh huh. Go pull my other leg now.

Contextually, there is simply no reason to see the choice of words in these documents as anything other than what they appear to be: attempts to twist, distort, and alter the representation of data to appear as advantageous as possible to their silly theory of anthropogenic global warming.

While the “mainstream” media and liberal politicians do their best to ignore this earth-shaking revelation, the people must push hard for a full investigation into this revelation, and a full examination of the pathetically weak “evidence” for anthropogenic global warming.

We must not even consider sacrificing our prosperity and freedom on the altar of a politically correct lie.


Try us out at the new location: American Clarion!


8 Responses to “Leaders Worldwide Call for Probe into Leaked Global Warming Emails”

  1. Many of us saw this coming. We knew an insider would one day defect and expose the whole charade. I believe we'll see something similar one day regarding the Darwinist cohort of true believers who will go to unimaginable lengths to defend their faith from the truth. It's only a matter of time before someone on the inside finally has enough of the fraud and decides to bring the house of cards down. Count on it.

  2. The global warming hoaxers are putting up a desperate fight in the run up to Copenhagen. Now they are running stories in the mainstream media (without comment sections) claiming that the ice caps are melting faster than ever. Well earlier this year German scientists using a fixed wing plane and sonar did the widest study of the Arctic yet and found that the ice was much thicker than was previously claimed.

    As for the Antarctic ice. Its up by 45% (source the national snow and ice data centre, University of Colorado).

  3. Bob said, “Uh huh. Go pull my other leg now.”

    They would see actual global warming if they would pull my finger!

    What do you suppose it will take for the “mainstream” news networks to report this major “scientific” scandal? The government-run media is so over-the-top with the left's infernal, lying agenda that I don't know if they are capable of reporting the truth.

    I like what Savage said this evening about the release of all the revealing emails. He prefaced it by reminding us that when Obama was elected and his administration was being exposed, and they started doing all these vile things against the will of the people, he had said, “Only God can save our country now.” And he's right (that has always been the case anyway). This evening, he said he thinks this release of emails is a gift from God. I hope he's right. If this snowballed, it could derail the whole kneecap & tax deal and the UN takeover. We can hope and pray.

  4. ATTENTION Senator James Inhofe,
    kindly have a look at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1992 (FCCC).
    Article 1 of the FCCC providing definitions offers none on the term “climate”, and if it had been based on the common explanation on “average weather”, the word “weather” would have required a definition as well. That the drafters failed to do so is a clear indication that they either lacked the scientific competence to do so, or they knew it would make no sense, because ‘average weather’ is statistics, and remain statistics regardless of any name given to the set of statistics.
    Instead the FCCC defines in
    · __Para. 2. “Climate change” means a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.
    · __Para. 3. “Climate system” means the totality of the atmosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere and geosphere and their interactions.
    Both explanations explain nothing. It is nonsense to say: Climate change means the change of climate, while ‘climate system’ does not say anything more as the interaction of nature. Science is using layman’s terms without being able or willing to define them in a scientifically reasonable manner, or not to use them at all. MORE at: http://www.whatisclimate.com/

  5. The British and American Governments funded these scientists, in a case of suspected fraud they must have the power to investigate, why are they not immediately onto these people and organisations. The Governments should be down on them like a ton of bricks.

  6. THE SAD THING ABOUT THIS WHOLE SCAM IS THERE IS A PLETHORA OF INFORMATION ON NATURAL CLIMATIC CHANGES ON THE INTERNET.
    ONE EXAMPLE : 1953 TUCSON, ARIZONA RECORDED .49″ OF RAIN. THIS WAS REPORTED AS THE BOTTOM OF A SEVENTY YEAR CYCLE THAT HAD, AT THAT TIME, BEEN TRACED BACK AROUND 800 YEARS. 2023 WILL BE THE SEVENTY YEARS. AND THERE ARE MANY OTHERS.

  7. THE SAD THING ABOUT THIS WHOLE SCAM IS THERE IS A PLETHORA OF INFORMATION ON NATURAL CLIMATIC CHANGES ON THE INTERNET.
    ONE EXAMPLE : 1953 TUCSON, ARIZONA RECORDED .49″ OF RAIN. THIS WAS REPORTED AS THE BOTTOM OF A SEVENTY YEAR CYCLE THAT HAD, AT THAT TIME, BEEN TRACED BACK AROUND 800 YEARS. 2023 WILL BE THE SEVENTY YEARS. AND THERE ARE MANY OTHERS.