Homosexual Activists Demand Right to Public Sex

(Source: Wikimedia Commons)

(Source: Wikimedia Commons)

Give homosexual activists an inch, they’ll take a mile.  This reality has proved itself over and over and over as society has incrementally grown more accepting of this immoral and unhealthy sexual practice.  Mere tolerance will never be enough, and was never the goal.

One of the latest examples comes from LifeSiteNews and England, where homosexual activists insist on the “right” to have sex in public:

The canal area in Manchester has long been a popular spot for cruising, but PinkNews reports that the area has been built up, resulting in more complaints from local people. In response, the Manchester police have begun patrolling the area more diligently, and potential ‘cruisers’ are being warned that they could face arrest.

OutRage! is calling for a “sensible, long-term and fair approach” to the issue, recommending tolerated ‘cruising areas.’

“The area that we’re talking about, cruising is tolerated unofficially,” OutRage! member David Henry told PinkNews. “But there is quite a lot of anger in the gay community about how it’s being handled.”

He claims that homosexuals have been “victimised and singled out,” attributing police actions to “homophobia.”

Ah, no. Decent people don’t want sex of any type going on in public. Decent human beings don’t want to be visually assaulted with something that should only be done in private…if at all.

What’s more, young children–who haven’t even begun to be mentally or emotionally equipped to deal with blatant displays of sex acts–should not be exposed to such things as they are likely to be when this behavior is allowed.

Interestingly, while both public homosexual and public heterosexual sex are improper and reprehensible, we don’t exactly see militant heterosexuals demanding to have sex in public places, do we?

Sadly, that tells us something about the moral bankruptcy of these homosexual activists, as well as their mental instability.

Regardless of their dysfunction, society is under no obligation whatsoever to tolerate this sexual irresponsibility.  Indeed, authorities have a responsibility to protect the public–especially children–from this filth.

A society that caters to the lowest common denominator will soon find itself wallowing in that denominator.

35 Responses to “Homosexual Activists Demand Right to Public Sex”

  1. Right-on, Bob Ellis!!

    These maniac perverts are trying to turn the whole world into their fantasy empire template: Sodom & Gomorrah. We know from what the Bible tells us, that in the last days, all hell will break loose, and this, no doubt, is part of it. We're in for the darkest of times at the hands of Satan's minions. We must “stand firm until the end,” to the best of our abilities with the Lord's vital help, because we KNOW that in the very end, we win.

    Praise be to God.

    Gina Miller

  2. There are homosexual activists screaming they want “only” what heterosexuals have. Apparently that is not true. They certainly don't seem to want the responsibility and accountability.

  3. Wow, talk about showing true colors. I said it elsewhere but I'll say it again: the pain that “gays” feel comes from the inside, not the outside. When they get their way on one thing and it doesn't take away the pain, they'll want their way on another thing. As with anyone else with a sexual addiction of some nature, no “gay” person will ever be at peace until he or she turns around and starts doing the right thing. Unfortunately few spoiled Americans are willing to walk such a hard road; they want rewards without work.

  4. These people have to have some kind of mental defect to even want to live this sick lifestyle and now they want the right to pratice their sick ways in public.This just proves that they need to be examined by a doctor.But one thing is for sure, God is still in charge and he has a plan and i know everything is going to be alright.

  5. Cruising does not mean sex people. Cruising is checking someone out NOT sex! If someone complained about public sex that is justified just as I complained about heterosexuals having sex in the bathroom at a Rapid City bar. However, what this is saying is that gay men are being singled out as potential offenders when they are consensually flirting or whatever.

    Again, the author furthered his anti-homosexual propaganda by mis-informing the public. Nice journalistic integrity.

  6. This article is a complete misinterpretation. Cruising does not mean sex; it is slang for flirting or checking someone out. Not only used by Homosexuals but by you “normal” heterosexuals. You “moral” people who would sooner crucify a homosexual person than to try give them an ounce of respect. Y'all are just christian maniacs who have perverted the word of god.

  7. What happens when a homosexual finds someone while cruising? They usually have sex with them, and quite often in public places. You and I both know this to be the case, so perhaps you should stop misleading the public about this dangerous and immoral behavior.

  8. See my reply to Anonymous and stop trying to mislead people. If homosexuals were simply looking for someone to sodomize, they could do so without ever revealing such intentions publicly. We both know that very often when homosexuals catch something, they usually clean and fry it right away–as in public restrooms, behind bushes, etc. This problem has been epidemic in areas of Britain and the U.S. for some time: http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/great-britai…, http://www.dakotavoice.com/2008/07/homosexuals-

    You might possibly be fooling yourself, and maybe a few gullible liberals, but you aren't fooling anyone else. Choose to do right and stop defending an immoral and unhealthy sexual practice–especially the public display of it.

  9. Maybe you should stop making it seem like homosexuals are the only ones who engage in behavior that you consider immoral – there are plenty of heterosexuals who also engage in behavior that you consider immoral.

  10. That's absolutely correct.

    However, (a) that is not the subject of this report, and (b) I know of no heterosexual constituency that is militantly demanding that society accept as moral such behaviors as rape, adultery, etc., and (c) immoral behavior of one type does not in any way improve the moral acceptability of any other immoral behavior.

  11. That because people like yourself only see homosexuality as nothing more than sexual behavior that can be prayed away or something.

    It's very difficult to debate a point when someone sees homosexuality as nothing more then a sex act – when in fact being a homosexual is about much more than who we have sex with.

  12. Prayer definitely helps, but accepting the need to change is essential, as is resolve. Without those, you will never see success.

    Homosexual behavior does indeed involve more than the mere sex act, but you cannot escape the reality that it is centrally a sexual act–an immoral and unnatural one.

  13. No centrally homosexuality isn't just a sexual act speaking from personal experience didn't have sex for 3 years of my adult life and there wasn't a single moment that I fooled myself into believing that I wasn't still a homosexual.

    Just like a drunkard – just because you don't drink anymore you'll always be an alcoholic.

    Since you people love comparing of lives with your list of sins the same thing applies to homosexuality I could stop having gay sex for the rest of life be I will ALWAYS be a homosexual!

  14. Thats a lie you've been fed that enables you to accept a debilitating slavery to an immoral behavior. I'm no more an alcoholic than is Pope Benedict. I'll always be a “former alcoholic” but I haven't had a drink in over 15 years and haven't wanted one for nearly that long. Even if I had wanted one, I would still not be an alcoholic as long as I did not give in to that behavior. Don't allow such psychobabble nonsense to keep you enslaved.

    You control your own destiny. You can be whatever kind of person you want to be, but you have to shed the excuses and deceptions. And yes, Christ can certainly help that process become a LOT easier.

  15. Sorry, Mister, but you're way off base. Bob Ellis pretty much said it all in his reply to you.

    I will add that your ignorant characterization of Christians is so far removed from reality that it's probably not worth even addressing your “points.”

    However, you said, “You “moral” people who would sooner crucify a homosexual person than to try give them an ounce of respect. Y'all are just christian maniacs who have perverted the word of god.”

    Not a word of that is true. You obviously have no knowledge of the Word of God, and no knowledge of Christians. And, apparently, you don't realize that the only people who want to “crucify” anyone are the wild animal, militant homosexuals, like all the good “Act Up” members who create chaos by busting into churches to raise hell where people are minding their own business. Activist homosexuals like to throw condoms at Christians, march naked in the streets (Folsom Street Fair ring a bell?), attack Christians and throw their Bibles to the ground, and call for the bombing of churches and murdering of Christians. We don't throw Bibles at your lost heads, now do we? And, how about that wonderful display of homosexual tolerance and kindness in the wake of the Proposition 8 vote in California? Oh, yeah.

    Christians are not the “haters,” thou deluded one.

    Gina Miller

  16. Oh please I don't need an excuse and I am not deceiving me myself (which I would be if I choose to follow a faith that I don't have faith in.) I don't follow your God in this life so I don't have to answer to him and if in the end I'm proving wrong so be it.

    I have been constantly warn about how your God feels about my “behavior” and what will happen to me for my disobedience which I'm also perfectly fine with. Until the day your Christ comes and tells me himself that he has a better way for me I will NOT be changing my life based on the wishes of his followers.

    Nor will I sit idly by and allow my government who I pay my taxes too treat me like a second class citizens due to it's slight majority of citizen's chosen personal faith based beliefs.

  17. You say that since you don't follow God you don't have to answer to him.

    Think about this: people who don't follow the laws of the land still have to answer to them. When you're speeding through a school zone, whether you think the law applies to you or not, whether you think a cop is nearby running radar, you remain subject to that law whether you like it or even recognize it…and sooner or later you will be called to account. So ignore the law–and God–to your own peril, because you will someday be held accountable.

    Meanwhile, government has an interest and an obligation to prevent a vitally important institution like marriage from being counterfeited and devalued.

    The government does not treat you like a second-class citizen; if anything, you treat yourself like one by choosing an immoral, unnatural and unhealthy sexual practice. Stop settling for less than the best and choose what's right and healthy

  18. Your logic is a bit off – I as all people should follow all the laws of our country and our state as required as a citizens of this great nation.

    If you believe the government has an interest and an obligation to prevent a vitally important institution like marriage from being devalued then people like yourself should be fighting just as hard against divorce as you do against the idea of same-sex civil marriage. But you don't do you? You may seat in your pews and say divorce is wrong but you do NOTHING about it. Yet the very idea that some of your fellow citizens want to express their love and protect their families only then does your moral indignation get's truly fired up.

    I do not wish to follow your idea or your chosen God idea of morality. What is unnatural to you is very natural to me to choose otherwise would be very unnatural and unfair to myself . As for my health I have never had an STD, I do not suffer from depression or any of the other sickness people like yourself assume people like me suffer from.

  19. You make ignorant assumptions, perhaps because deep down you know there are no grounds to justify this immoral and unhealthy behavior.

    I speak out in defense of marriage against ALL threats, including divorce, and work hard to keep my marriage vital.

    Frankly it doesn't matter who you love or lust after; what matters is that homosexual sex is unnatural, immoral and unhealthy. It will never be legitimate.

    Again, you may not wish to obey God, but one day you will be held accountable for violating his laws, just as we all will be. I hope that you can realize the error of your ways and change before you stand before the Judge–because then it will be too late to admit how wrong you've been.

  20. A truly brave man will always except responsibility for his actions – so if your judge finds me guilty for accepting who I know myself to be – then I will except his punishment with the same amount of pride that I have in my body, my mind and my soul in this life!

  21. You're right about accepting responsibility. Unfortunately you identified one of the most critical points I've been trying to explain to you while missing that point at the same time: you were not created to be a homosexual.

    You were created to have sex with someone of the opposite sex within marriage. Doing anything other than that is a failure to accept who you really are and a failure to live up to your best and highest potential.

    I hope someday you can realize that truth and see it happen.

  22. In the eyes of YOUR God and YOUR faith I wasn't created to be a homosexual. However I'm not a follower of your God or your faith. Why do Christians, Muslims and Orthodox Jews – believe everyone should follow your paths? Then turn right around and accuse the rest of us of trying to force our beliefs onto you!

  23. As I've tried to explain to you before, it doesn't matter that you don't want to be subject to God's authority and standards. You are, by virtue of being one of his creations. Shake your fist at him all you want, but you'll still have to answer for breaking his laws just as surely as you'll answer to getting caught driving 55 MPH in a school zone, even though you didn't think a cop was watching, even though you didn't think the law applied to you in your circumstance.

    You don't have to follow the right path, but don't expect props or accommodation for going the wrong way, either. And don't expect to escape justice, either.

  24. You're setting up an unfair strawman argument – as I said before I wouldn't break laws that govern my country or my state.

    With regards to your God – I'm not shaking my fist at him – he's not my God – I do not answer to the Christian God for he is not the God I have faith in.

    As I said before if in the end I'm wrong and the world belongs to the Christian God – I will accept any punishment that I would be sentence too. In the meantime I will NOT deny who I am because of his followers wishes – anymore you would deny your faith based on the wishes of others who don't believe as you do!

  25. I think you understand what I'm trying to tell you, but you don't want to accept it. I understand that. Most of us have been there at some point or another.

    But I think we've spent enough of each other's time. You don't have to accept that punishment; you can surrender your will to God's and receive his pardon, but you're not yet at the point where you're willing to admit his authority over you. I hope you can accept the truth before it's too late.

  26. Oh please I don't need an excuse and I am not deceiving me myself (which I would be if I choose to follow a faith that I don't have faith in.) I don't follow your God in this life so I don't have to answer to him and if in the end I'm proving wrong so be it.

    I have been constantly warn about how your God feels about my “behavior” and what will happen to me for my disobedience which I'm also perfectly fine with. Until the day your Christ comes and tells me himself that he has a better way for me I will NOT be changing my life based on the wishes of his followers.

    Nor will I sit idly by and allow my government who I pay my taxes too treat me like a second class citizens due to it's slight majority of citizen's chosen personal faith based beliefs.

  27. You say that since you don't follow God you don't have to answer to him.

    Think about this: people who don't follow the laws of the land still have to answer to them. When you're speeding through a school zone, whether you think the law applies to you or not, whether you think a cop is nearby running radar, you remain subject to that law whether you like it or even recognize it…and sooner or later you will be called to account. So ignore the law–and God–to your own peril, because you will someday be held accountable.

    Meanwhile, government has an interest and an obligation to prevent a vitally important institution like marriage from being counterfeited and devalued.

    The government does not treat you like a second-class citizen; if anything, you treat yourself like one by choosing an immoral, unnatural and unhealthy sexual practice. Stop settling for less than the best and choose what's right and healthy

  28. Your logic is a bit off – I as all people should follow all the laws of our country and our state as required as a citizens of this great nation.

    If you believe the government has an interest and an obligation to prevent a vitally important institution like marriage from being devalued then people like yourself should be fighting just as hard against divorce as you do against the idea of same-sex civil marriage. But you don't do you? You may seat in your pews and say divorce is wrong but you do NOTHING about it. Yet the very idea that some of your fellow citizens want to express their love and protect their families only then does your moral indignation get's truly fired up.

    I do not wish to follow your idea or your chosen God idea of morality. What is unnatural to you is very natural to me to choose otherwise would be very unnatural and unfair to myself . As for my health I have never had an STD, I do not suffer from depression or any of the other sickness people like yourself assume people like me suffer from.

  29. You make ignorant assumptions, perhaps because deep down you know there are no grounds to justify this immoral and unhealthy behavior.

    I speak out in defense of marriage against ALL threats, including divorce, and work hard to keep my marriage vital.

    Frankly it doesn't matter who you love or lust after; what matters is that homosexual sex is unnatural, immoral and unhealthy. It will never be legitimate.

    Again, you may not wish to obey God, but one day you will be held accountable for violating his laws, just as we all will be. I hope that you can realize the error of your ways and change before you stand before the Judge–because then it will be too late to admit how wrong you've been.

  30. A truly brave man will always except responsibility for his actions – so if your judge finds me guilty for accepting who I know myself to be – then I will except his punishment with the same amount of pride that I have in my body, my mind and my soul in this life!

  31. You're right about accepting responsibility. Unfortunately you identified one of the most critical points I've been trying to explain to you while missing that point at the same time: you were not created to be a homosexual.

    You were created to have sex with someone of the opposite sex within marriage. Doing anything other than that is a failure to accept who you really are and a failure to live up to your best and highest potential.

    I hope someday you can realize that truth and see it happen.

  32. In the eyes of YOUR God and YOUR faith I wasn't created to be a homosexual. However I'm not a follower of your God or your faith. Why do Christians, Muslims and Orthodox Jews – believe everyone should follow your paths? Then turn right around and accuse the rest of us of trying to force our beliefs onto you!

  33. As I've tried to explain to you before, it doesn't matter that you don't want to be subject to God's authority and standards. You are, by virtue of being one of his creations. Shake your fist at him all you want, but you'll still have to answer for breaking his laws just as surely as you'll answer to getting caught driving 55 MPH in a school zone, even though you didn't think a cop was watching, even though you didn't think the law applied to you in your circumstance.

    You don't have to follow the right path, but don't expect props or accommodation for going the wrong way, either. And don't expect to escape justice, either.

  34. You're setting up an unfair strawman argument – as I said before I wouldn't break laws that govern my country or my state.

    With regards to your God – I'm not shaking my fist at him – he's not my God – I do not answer to the Christian God for he is not the God I have faith in.

    As I said before if in the end I'm wrong and the world belongs to the Christian God – I will accept any punishment that I would be sentence too. In the meantime I will NOT deny who I am because of his followers wishes – anymore you would deny your faith based on the wishes of others who don't believe as you do!

  35. I think you understand what I'm trying to tell you, but you don't want to accept it. I understand that. Most of us have been there at some point or another.

    But I think we've spent enough of each other's time. You don't have to accept that punishment; you can surrender your will to God's and receive his pardon, but you're not yet at the point where you're willing to admit his authority over you. I hope you can accept the truth before it's too late.