150,000 Americans Sign Manhattan Declaration in First Week

imagesbannerscp_120x60Reprinted by permission of the Christian Post

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter

More than 150,000 people have so far signed the Manhattan Declaration, just a week after the document was unveiled.

And one of the document’s drafters, Chuck Colson, hopes the number will soon reach a million so that Christians would put America on notice that they will not compromise their faith, no matter what.

j0443601Leaders from the evangelical, Orthodox and Catholic traditions released “The Manhattan Declaration: A Call of Christian Conscience” last week to stand firm on what they consider the three most foundational issues in society – the sanctity of life, the historic understanding of marriage, and religious liberty.

It serves as a proclamation to the nation’s leaders that they will not abandon or compromise their conscience on the three issues and as a call to the Christian church to unite in upholding the truths as followers of Jesus Christ.

Jim Daly, president and CEO of Focus on the Family and who was among the leaders at the release, has called the document “a historic development within the American church.”

“The document is a fresh and lively presentation, a renewed rallying cry to those who have been engaged in this historic effort of spiritual and cultural conversion,” Daly stated in an e-mail Wednesday. “This is not a manifesto for culture war; it is a prescription for cultural change.”

“This is a document that exhorts us to champion Christian truths in a Christian manner,” he asserted.

But not all Christian leaders have affixed their names to the declaration.

Well-known evangelical pastor John MacArthur of Grace Community Church in Sun Valley, Calif., believes the document “falls far short of identifying the one true and ultimate remedy for all of humanity’s moral ills: the Gospel.”

The Gospel, he said, is barely mentioned in the declaration.

He also doesn’t agree with playing down the differences between evangelicals and the other faith traditions involved, such as Roman Catholics, whom he considers “purveyors of different gospels.”

“Instead of acknowledging the true depth of our differences, the implicit assumption (from the start of the document until its final paragraph) is that Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Protestant Evangelicals and others all share a common faith in and a common commitment to the gospel’s essential claims,” he stated.

Supporting the document would “tacitly relegate the very essence of Gospel truth to the level of a secondary issue,” MacArthur argued. “That is the wrong way – perhaps the very worst way – for evangelicals to address the moral and political crises of our time.”

Pre-eminet evangelical Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr., also believes the Roman Catholic Church teaches doctrines that are unbiblical and doesn’t sign documents between evangelicals and Catholics that attempt to establish common ground on theological issues.

But he added his name to the Manhattan Declaration, citing that the document is a limited statement of Christian conviction on three crucial issues and not a theological document.

“The Manhattan Declaration does not attempt to establish common ground on these doctrines,” Mohler, president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, stated in a recent commentary. “We remain who we are, and we concede no doctrinal ground.”

The Manhattan Declaration, which was drafted last summer, comes as Christians feel the sanctity of human life, traditional marriage and freedom of religion and conscience are under assault. The original signers have stressed, however, that it is not a political statement and that the document could have been released 10 years ago or even 10 years later.

The message emphasized in the document is the same message Christians have been proclaiming for centuries but this is the first time Catholics, Orthodox believers and evangelicals have rallied together behind it, Dr. Timothy George, one of three leaders who drafted the document, noted last week.

Though the church leaders hope the time will not come when they would be compelled to practice civil disobedience, they say if American laws impinge on their conscience in any way (i.e. forced to conduct anabortion procedure), then they will not comply with the law in order to honor their own conscience.

“We pledge to each other, and to our fellow believers, that no power on earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence,” the declaration states. “It is our duty to proclaim the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in its fullness, both in season and out of season. May God help us not to fail in that duty.”

On the Web: http://manhattandeclaration.org/

Copyright 2009 The Christian Post. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • brianrutledge
    The problem with this document and one of its founders, Chuck Colson,is declaring they "will not compromise their faith no matter what". That takes in a lot of ground and for Biblical literalists, it means never even considering anything that goes against Scripture. That includes such things as evolution, age of the universe, age of the earth etc., if they contradict Scripture. That would mean that there is no need to even consider other scenarios or science that contradict the 6 day creation story. It would in essence be blasphemy.

    Kurt Wise, who got his Ph.D at Harvard in Geology and is a main science contributor to the Creation Museum,summed up the creationist view best when he said "If all the evidence in the universe turns against creation, I would be the first to admit it, but would still believe in Creation because that is what the word of God indicates" .

    At least he is honest in saying that no matter what evidence or proof science provides, he will reject it, because the Bible says otherwise. I find that perplexing, but respect his honesty in the matter
  • ashinfortworth
    Sadly Dr. Mohler and Mr. McArthur have missed the point: this is not a theological documenet, rather it is one intentended for all like-minded Christians to establish solidarity on critical issues which are being attacked and eroded by marxist, socialist, far-left liberal loons who seek to tear this country and everything it stands for down. That 'holier-than-thou' attitude of looking down on the Catholic Church as being somehow less than Christian is less than useful.
  • It is discouraging to hear leaders like MacArthur and Mohler criticize this effort because of doctrinal differences with other denominations. As a long-time Catholic and now Southern Baptist for the past 12 years I have witnessed unbiblical doctrines and practices in both denominations.

    Drs. MacArthur's and Mohler's sincerity is called into question when they watch almost 80% of their youth drift away from their faith yet have little to say about Christians sending their children to government schools that indoctrinate them with all things antithetical to the Gospel.

    We are engaged in a war against a culture that will continue to claim our children's minds and souls if we don't stand against it. Can we put aside our doctrinal differences for just a while to oppose the evil that confronts us here and now?

    I encourage all Christians, Jews and people of like values to take part in this effort to stand firm against the forces of darkness.
  • I concur.

    I've spent most of my life in one denomination (or within one larger grouping of what could be considered smaller subsets of denomination, of which I've been members of three different subsets over the years), but have attended a large variety of churches with family and friends. These include liturgical churches, charismatic churches, and almost everything in between. I see some fault in other denominations...but I see things in my own that don't line up with Scripture either.

    While there are key tenets upon which we must all agree in order to be considered Christ-followers, there are a number of things within the Bible which are not fully and definitively explained and so with varying human experiences we sometimes see these nuances differently. As Paul said, "Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known." One day we'll get to know what we got right, and what we got wrong.

    But I've been working for years with brothers and sisters from dozens of denominations in the key areas where we agree, especially in the realm of public policy and morality. On most of these subjects--especially the ones wracking our culture today--the Bible is quite clear on what is right and what is wrong.

    There is a time and a place for emphasizing the teachings of our particular doctrinal differences (i.e within our own churches), but we must remember how fervently Christ prayed only hours before he went to the cross that we, his followers, would be one.

    We must come together and work together to be the light and salt that this dark and decaying world so desperately needs, and nothing but pride stands in our way. Too much is at stake, too many lives to be destroyed and too many souls to be lost for us to refuse to work together in these critical areas.

    To quote Benjamin Franklin, "We must, indeed, all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
  • Very well said, Mr. Ellis.
blog comments powered by Disqus