For Canada’s Sake, We Must Preserve Free Market Health Care in America

j0426458Jessica Peck Corry has a great article on socialized health care at Human Events today.

She examines the Canadian socialist health care system to illustrate where President Obama and his fellow Marxist are hell-bent to take America.

Enter Rick Baker, a Canadian determined to improve health care in his country. Baker joined Gilbert Monday at a Vancouver hotel to speak with American reporters as part of a health care dialogue organized by the Colorado-based Independence Institute, a free market think tank where I am a public policy analyst.

Baker began by offering a blunt disclosure. “I make my living sending patients to the U.S.,” he said. “This is medical tourism, but instead of sending someone to Thailand, we’re sending them to Delaware.”

Through an innovative partnership with 22 independent American surgery centers and doctors in 13 states, Baker and his American counterparts transport Canadians to the U.S. for timely care at cost savings up to 80 percent. The partnership operates largely outside the traditional health insurance system. And this isn’t just about helping Canadians. Baker now also provides a similar state-to-state service for Americans seeking more affordable or timely care.

Under Canada’s controversial federal health legislation, surgeons are prohibited from charging patients to provide “medically necessary” treatment. In addition, they are limited to performing surgeries to six hours a week. Gilbert recalled one surgeon telling her, “I spend six hours in surgery each week, less time than I spend explaining to sick patients why I can’t perform theirs.”

At least Canadians have some outlet, some relief valve through which to escape socialist morass and mediocrity. The poor British (I lived there for three years and was treated by their National Health Service) have nowhere else to turn–mainland Europe is even further down the road of socialism than they are.

Speaking of Canada’s system, I’ve visited Canada a couple of systems and seen a bit of how things work there, though not nearly as intimately as I did the British system.  But my wife and I have some Canadian friends who came to visit us for a couple of weeks several years ago, and something that happened while they were here illustrates one of the key reasons socialist health care systems don’t work well.

While I took about a week off while our Canadian friends were staying with us, I ran out of vacation time and had to go back to work before they left.  While at work, I got a call from my wife and one of our Canadian friends about something that had happened to my son that morning.  It was a relatively insignificant injury which, had I been there, I could have taken care of in 60 seconds and sent my little guy on his merry way playing again.  I tried to tell my Canadian friend (who was trying to be helpful and look out for my family in my absence) what he could do to remedy things, but he was politely insistent that I needed to take my son to the hospital.  After several attempts to explain this to him over the phone and soothe my Canadian friend, I finally gave up and drove home from work to demonstrate that 60 seconds of “home health care” and then go back to work.

You see, my Canadian friend (like many people in “free” socialist health care systems) was used to employing the health care system for things that most Americans simply deal with on their own. We don’t see the need to waste hours out of our day to have a medical professional do what we could do for ourselves–all because it’s “free.”  This widespread attitude leads to trivial but massive overload of the health care system…leaving the system incapable of dealing with the serious health issues of others.

This brings us to a point in the article that gets close to the heart of why socialists systems never work.

The Vancouver gathering came as President Barack Obama continues his push to radically expand the role of government in administering American health care. But participants weren’t just focused on bashing Canada as a role model. It was also about explaining that America’s health care woes don’t come from an absence of government, but rather too much government and not enough consumer choice.

“The Canadian system is a Ponzi scheme is that is just a little further along ours,” explained Dr. Keith Smith, an Oklahoma anesthesiologist who partners with Baker and manages his own outpatient surgery center. Baker believes real change will come only when patients are given the incentive to help control costs, freed from being forced to blindly abide by the decisions of insurance companies.

Ponzi schemes (which is all socialism is, really) will work only so long as the contributors greatly outnumber the consumers. And with human nature being what it is, some are going to consume at ghastly and wasteful rates that quickly throw the system off kilter. And it isn’t long after that many of the contributors start to see they are working hard to contribute to a system where others take and take and take, and the contributors get very little for their effort. When these awakening contributors realize this, they often slow down or quit contributing to join the gravy train.

We’ve seen this with Canada’s health care system.

We’ve seen this with England’s health care system.

We’ve seen this with Sweden’s health care system.

We’ve seen this with France’s health care system.

We see this in every Marxist/socialist system that’s ever been tried around the world, including the former Soviet Union.

We saw this when the Pilgrims tried it in America.

We’ve seen it with Massachussett’s socialist health care system.

We’ve seen it with America’s Social Security and other welfare systems–that are all inefficient, wasteful and going broke.

Why, why, why do we never seem to learn?!

Why are some among us always so arrogant to think that somehow they can find the magic angle to make something work that generations of human beings around the world have never been able to make work?

It’s because as with most issues on the Left, liberals fail to understand human nature, or refuse to understand it. And in doing so, they are dangerously close to dragging down the greatest nation in history to socialist mediocrity and probable oblivion.

We must turn around 180 degrees from the schemes of President Obama and run as fast as we can away from them…and toward free market solutions that empower consumers, encourage competition, reduce costs, and are in harmony with the economic principles that made America the most prosperous nation in history.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Canadian_Speed
    It is rare to read such blatantly misleading and wholly inaccurate garbage.
    I almost do not know where to begin with this drivel it is so bad. I am left in awe at this attempt to trash the Canadian system in an attempt to deflect how poorly the American system is at treating ALL of its citizens.
    Lets start with Dr. Baker and his "Medical Tourism". Here we have someone who by the very nature of the Hippocratic Oath should not be allowed to be called a Doctor. A medical professional taking advantage of peoples fears by convincing them that if they pay him a handsome fee he can get them quick treatment in the US instead of having to wait for treatment in Canada. Thing is, the wait is determined by the need and no one has to go without when their needs are urgent. How is he providing Canadians with savings of up to 80% when they could be getting the treatment in Canada at no expense? His comment on Surgeons being restricted to 6hrs of Surgery a week is pure fiction! I know Surgeons who are lucky if the ONLY have to do 6hrs a day!
    I am amazed at the story about the Canadian "Friend" who was insistent on taking the gentleman's son to the Hospital when he was injured. His injury was apparently minor and didn't need the care of a physician. The amazing part to me was that the reason for the "Friends" actions were attributed to his being used to over using a "Socialist" system. Wow, just wow. I would be more inclined to chalk it up to a visitor freaking out because their hosts kid got hurt while on their watch. An over-reaction to be sure but that's about it!
    This article is just so condescending to the average Canadian its quite infuriating. As a Canadian with hundreds of American friends I am proud of the medical system we have and cannot count how many times I have been grateful that we have the system that we have! When I have had to go to the Hospital with a broken rib, I have had to wait for hours to be seen. When I went to the Hospital because of severe head pain (it was meningitis) I was seen to INSTANTLY! The system see's to whoever needs to be seen to first, its that simple! It is NOT a "Marxist/Socialist" system, it is a system that see's to it that EVERY citizen has a high quality of care regardles of their ability to pay. There's plenty about the system that could be better but its still a darned good one!
    The last paragraph of this article reads "We must turn around 180 degrees from the schemes of President Obama and run as fast as we can away from them…and toward free market solutions that empower consumers, encourage competition, reduce costs, and are in harmony with the economic principles that made America the most prosperous nation in history". "Empowers consumers"? Health care shouldn't be about consumerism...EVER! "Reduces costs"? Take a second and compare the cost of drugs in the US to their costs in Canada. Somehow the "Free market solutions" don't seem to be helping the average American who needs help but can't afford their prescribed meds!
    Bottom line measurement? Which country has the longer lifespan? Care to guess? Hmmm, maybe the US Health Care System isn't the worlds best after all!
    The United States of America is the greatest nation on earth. I love my country and I am proud to be a Canadian but I love the US and have so many amazing friends there. Americans deserve better and as the true beacon of Democracy in this world they should be doing better. Quit the partisan fear mongering and get on with seeing to it that ALL of your citizens have access to the basic human right that is Health Care.
    Thank you.
  • It's more than a bit disingenious pretending that Canada is some kind of Marxist system - our Prime Minister (like President) is as conservative as Bush was, if not more. I, a some pinko nut as I am sure you would casually put it given that I am to the left of Attila the hun, don't like our conservative government at all - but that is exactly what it is so you can't slag Canada for being commies.

    We don't constantly use the health care system for everything and are afraid of taking care of things for ourselves. But we will use it when we are sick or hurt - that's what it is for.

    Obama's plan doesn't go nearly far enough - you need a fully universal system, straight up, and you'll save money, business will save money on health costs,etc... This is simply about health insurance corporations, tied to the government you are so against, using their clout to keep a much needed universal health system from happening in the U.S. And people back them as if they are not in themselves government backed tyrannies of their own. It is unbelievable.

    You are in the Dakota's - go to Saskatchewan and ask a few people randomly what they think of their healthcare, not just cherry pick those who agree with you. And Saskatchewan has one of the most right wing governments in North America right now, yet they still back universal health care.

    Nice to hear a bit of sanity from 'Canadian_Speed.

    For more Canadian perspectives: www.dumpthesick.com
  • If it's Marxist, it's Marxist. It doesn't matter who's in charge at one particular time or another; the system in place is Marxist. As an additional illustration, when I lived in England, Margaret Thatcher was prime minister, and she's definitely no Marxist...but the system was set up long before her, and stopping the Marxist gravy train once it's in place is extremely difficult.

    Which is why it is so important that America doesn't take this big step toward the abyss. Once we get it in place, it will be a miracle to ever get rid of it and move back toward the free market system that made America such an incredible place.
  • Actually Americans suffer accidental deaths at a higher rate than many nations; probably because we like to live fast and a little dangerously--part of that "freedom" thing, you know. Many of us just have a hard time living like docile sheep.

    Some of us also abuse the additional freedom we have by committing crimes against others, primarily murder as it relates to this subject. If someone is murdered, the health care system didn't let them down (if anything, the court system let them down because we let too many dirtbags get away with little or no real punishment, fostering a disrespect for the law).

    When you remove accidents and such from the equation and look at the effectiveness of the health care that is available and administered, our lifespan is better than any other nation. Economists Robert L. Ohsfeldt and John E. Schneider did a study on that a few years ago.

    You're right that Canadians should be infuriated, though--infuriated at their own government taking their hard-earned dollars from them without their consent in order to support a bloated, inefficient, wasteful system that is truly pathetic (as all socialist systems are).

    I know a lot of us here in America are infuriated at what is already robbed from us by our own government, and livid that they are demanding even more.

    If you don't understand that a socialist health care system is Marxist in nature, then perhaps your government failed you in the education department as well. Government health care systems are clearly in harmony with Marxist principles of government control and wealth redistribution, and antithetical to the free market.

    You say health care shouldn't "EVER" be about the consumer, which again demonstrates that you have a love and loyalty for Marxism. In the free market, the primary focus is the customer; under Marxism, the individual (or customer) is just a cog in the machine, and the cog's happiness is irrelevant so long as the machine keeps working.

    As soon as you can figure out a way for government to magically make the goods and services provided by the health care industry magically pop into existence with no expenditure of effort or financial investment, then perhaps you can rationally claim health care doesn't belong in the realm of the free market. Until then, it takes someone's effort and someone's property (their money) to produce those goods and services and they deserve just compensation for them--something they don't get under Marxism.

    You're right about one thing: Americans do deserve better than what we have now. Currently, we have a bastardized hybrid that is about half-socialist with all the government health care (Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, etc) and government regulation. Americans deserve to have a free-market system compatible with the way of life that has made us the greatest nation on earth, and one that is in harmony with the Constitution it currently violates.
blog comments powered by Disqus