ENDA a Threat to Religious Liberty

2009-10-02 20.53.10

Carrie Gordon Earll

Stuart Shepard and Carrie Gordon Earll, Senior Director of Issue Analysis at Focus Action, talk about the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), an Orwellian-named pro-homosexual bill that will pave the way to discriminate against Christians and anyone who tells the truth about the immoral and unhealthy practice of homosexual behavior.

The bill would add two new categories of protected classes: sexual orientation and gender identity.  If you are a man who “feels like a woman,” you get to wear a dress and makeup to work whether your employer wants his business to be identified with such nonsense or not.

This is bad enough for any employer to have to put up with this assault on their freedom of association and their freedom to present their business to the public however they’d like, but it is even worse for a Christian business person or a Christian business that may want to maintain a reputation of moral uprightness and a family-friendly environment.

This kind of harassment of Christians is not merely theoretical, either.  It is already happening. These are just some of the examples where Christians and Christian businesses have been harassed by homosexuals under the guise of “equality”:

  • Last year a Catholic priest in Canada, Fr. Alphonse de Valk, who was investigated by the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) for the “crime” of teaching what the Bible says about homosexual behavior (that it is a sin) and marriage (that it is between a man and a woman).
  • The Ontario Human Rights Commission slapped Protestant printer Scott Brockie with a $5000 fine for refusing to print homosexual-themed stationary.
  • The Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal fined Hugh Owens several thousand dollars for quoting the Bible in a letter to the local newspaper.
  • Mayor Diane Haskett in London, Ontario, was fined $10,000  for refusing to proclaim a gay pride day.
  • Swedish Pastor Ake Green in 2004 was sentenced to 30 days in jail for preaching a sermon in which he defined homosexual behavior as sinful and harmful to society.
  • A British couple were questioned by police on possible “hate crime” charges after they wrote a letter-to-the-editor of their local newspaper criticizing city officials for distributing brochures at city hall promoting homosexual behavior.
  • In Canada, Focus on the Family must cut out any portions of their broadcasts dealing with homosexuality for radio stations in that country.
  • Last year the Alberta Human Rights Tribunal ruled that youth pastor Stephen Boissoin was guilty of writing a letter to the editor of the Red Deer Advocate which might expose homosexuals to hate and contempt (Boissoin’s 2002 letter said homosexuality was immoral, physically dangerous and should not be promoted in schools).
  • Not content with their success in quashing open refusals to bow at the altar of political correctness, the Canadian pro-homosexual group EGALE (Equality for Gays and Lesbians Everywhere) is calling for the Canadian postal system to censor the mail for “hate mail”
  • Catholic Charities in Boston was forced out of the adoption ministry because they refused to put children in homes of homosexual couples.
  • Boston school teachers have been threatened with termination if they fail to cast homosexuality in a positive light to students.
  • The University of Toledo fired a black administrator for writing a “letter to the editor” of a local newspaper about the inconsistency of comparing homosexuality to ethnicity.
  • Christians in Philadelphia were arrested for reading Bible verses and praying out loud during a homosexual festival.
  • The state of New Mexico issued a fine of $6,600 to a Christian photographer (a private businessman) who didn’t want to photograph two lesbians make a commitment to each other.
  • A Colorado law passed last year to allow men to use women’s restrooms and shower rooms if they “felt like a woman” also contained provisions which prohibits the publication for public consumption any material which is “discriminatory” against homosexual behavior.  So while churches can (for now) continue teaching within their own walls what the Bible says about homosexual behavior, they cannot publish anything in public which does.  This includes any Christian book publishers or other ministries in Colorado.

This Administration and this Congress are in the midst of a full-scale assault on everything that is good, everything that is decent, on the United States Constitution, on the Christian faith, on everything about the American way of life as we have known it for most of the last 200+ years.

And the people must hold these usurpers accountable, right now and at the next opportunity at the ballot box.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Rob
    It's striking that this article cites a lot of examples of foreign laws and local laws that have resulted in issues for religious freedom, but it doesn't mention a provision of THIS bill that will result in problems.

    That's because ENDA itself won't cause any problems for religious freedom. The bill explicitly exempts religious organizations and businesses with fewer than 15 employees. Your church is not going to be forced to hire gay people. Nor is your "family-friendly" mom-and-pop store. (I'm using scare quotes because I don't think a business that discriminates against gay families is family-friendly.)

    It's true that if you're a conservative Christian businesperson, and you want to be a manager for a big company, you won't be allowed to fire people for being gay. But gay people won't be able to fire you for being a conservative Christian. That's a fair deal, isn't it?
  • The point of all those foreign and domestic examples where Christians have been forced to bow to the homosexual agenda is to illustrate that Christians are already being persecuted even without ENDA in place, and ENDA will only add to it.

    Businesses and organizations should not be forced to hire people who openly live immorally and bring disrepute on their organizations, regardless of whether they have 4 employees or 400.

    Only the naive believe such "exemptions" would last very long anyway, before they're challenged in our morally bankrupt courts where morally bankrupt judges will "find" new and special rights for homosexuals that were "overlooked" by ENDA.

    No sane culture makes a protected class based on a sexual behavior, and no sane culture could even remotely consider making a protected class based on an immoral and demonstrably unhealthy sexual behavior.
  • Our current civil rights laws prevent job discrimination based on a person's choice of religion. So you can't be fired from you job just because your boss doesn't Muslims or Jews or whatever. Are these civil rights laws "threats to religious liberty?" Funny, I don't seem to recall anyone complaining about THAT.
  • jakeH
    I find it kind of sad that you complain so much about theretical restrictions to your "beliefs" in the same breath you demand others have no right to theirs. Freedom is freedom, and not the power for you to supress others.
  • One person's freedom ends where another person's begins. If you're a man who wants to dress up like a woman and walk around in your house that way or down the public sidewalk, no one is stopping you.

    But if you demand that a church, a Christian business or Christian business owner hire you when you make a public display of values and immorality contrary to those held by your prospective employer, to empower the state to force that upon said Christian or Christian organization is incompatible with American principles and American government, and is in fact the epitome of forcing the acceptance of your opinion on another person--something I think all of us should be able to agree is reprehensible in any society.
  • jakeH
    I dont see you giving up your same protections saying I can't fire you for being Christian or your immoral actions and/or beliefs.

    You won't even let people get married or get basic protections because of your opinion. In fact, you demand that the government force that on everyone or YOU are somehow discriminated against (at the same time nothing real on your end is being affected).

    You are in no position to talk to me about shoving views down peoples throats. Untill you realize that, I suggest you grow up a bit and get a clue. Getting rid of your smug sense of entitlement wouldn't hurt much either.
  • I think it would be a pathetic shame for an employer to fire someone for being a Christian, but an immoral heathen should have the same freedom of association and projection of his values as anyone else.

    And I'm not even advocating that anyone be blocked from getting married. I think marriage is a great and wonderful thing; I enjoy my marriage a great deal.

    But you have to have two basic elements before you can form a marriage: a man and a woman. Two men or two women can't form a marriage, any more than you can form a plumbing system in your house using all male or all female parts.

    You can try, but I guarantee you that you won't have a plumbing system in your house--you'll just have an unnatural mess that is a mockery of a real plumbing job and doesn't accomplish anything, which is the same thing you get when you put two men or two women together.

    Grownups don't fancy that they can just want something into reality. A marriage requires a man and a woman. Anything else is a counterfeit that can in no way live up to the real thing.
  • DCM
    This is not a case of people with some questionable "belief" using that belief to deny others their rights. This is a case of people who recognize the truth not being willing to cooperate with those who expect their denial of the truth to be accepted without question... of people being unwilling to accept a counterfeit as if it were the "real thing."

    There are those who know what the "real thing" is, and who live accordingly. Others, sadly, cannot see that there even *is* a "real thing" that stands above and apart from its substitutes. The former dwell in a place that the latter do not even believe exists.

    Tragically, there is widespread failure these days to recognize what the "real thing" actually is. So many marriages (including the one I unwisely got into when younger) are no better than their counterfeits. So many people think marriage is nothing more than an officially recognized sexual partnership. So many people think "love" is nothing more than a nice feeling that someone else inspires in you. And the really sad thing is, so many of these people are supposedly "Christians" and should know better.
blog comments powered by Disqus