Adult Stem Cells Used to Regrow Boy’s Cheekbones

j0438717Chalk up yet another success for adult stem cell therapy (still a big zip for the human-life-destroying embryonic stem cell research).

Scientific American reports doctors in Cincinnati have replaced a boy’s missing cheekbones using stem cells from fat tissue from his own body:

Stem cells so far have been used to mend tissues ranging from damaged hearts to collapsed tracheas. Now the multifaceted cells have proved successful at regrowing bone in humans. In the first procedure of its kind, doctors at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center replaced a 14-year-old boy’s missing cheekbones—in part by repurposing stem cells from his own body.

The technique, should it be approved for widespread use, could benefit some seven million people in the U.S. who need more bone—everyone from cancer patients to injured war veterans.

“This is sort of the holy grail for a number of different surgeons,” says Jesse Taylor, a surgeon and researcher in the hospital’s Division of Plastic Surgery and one of the procedure’s lead physicians. The procedure could be used in plastic, orthopedic and neural surgeries, he notes. Some bone tissue had previously been generated from stem cells in the lab, but this marks hope for a surgical solution for those who need additional bone.

“We often find ourselves in the operating room saying, ‘Man, I wish we had a little more bone,’” Taylor says. In adult patients plastic and metal have often subbed in, in the absence of bone, but as Taylor notes: “What happens if someone gets a fracture? It’s another surgery.” In contrast, a natural bone regrown from stem cells should heal on its own. Another alternative, bone transplants—either repurposed from the patient’s body or from cadavers—have high rejection and absorption rates, leading to many unsuccessful attempts.

Unlike embryonic stem cells–which destroy innocent human life in the harvesting, have problems with tissue rejection and create tumors in the recipient–adult stem cell research has already resulted in between 70 and 80 successful medical therapies.  It also has none of the practical problems that embryonic stem cell therapies pose.

Even though it has been researched for years, with both private and public funding, in countries across the globe, embryonic stem cell research has yet to produce a single successful therapy.

Meanwhile, adult stem cell research has produced treatments for brain injuries, stroke, retina regeneration, heart tissue regeneration, angina, diabetes, bone cancer, nerve regeneration, cerebral palsy, cartilage regeneration, Parkinsons, kidney damage, liver cancer, lupus, multiple sclerosis, leukemia and more.

There is simply no reason (other than the huge grant money floating around) to continue destroying innocent human life in embryonic stem cell research when adult stem cell research is already providing wonders for dozens of ailments.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Brian Rutledge
    Well I wouldn't exactly call it 'talking to the press' in this instance. This was reported by Scientific American and the press then takes off on such stories. In todays world, it is nearly impossible to keep such studies 'under hat' which is why the people who did this research and surgery were very careful not to be overly optimistic.That's why they mentioned the 'better than 50% chance of working' and waiting for 5 years before its efficacy is known. They were also just being honest and i applaud them for it.

    I still think that those of us who oppose ESC research should be careful in overstating the success of adult stem cell research. It's advances have to be looked at honestly and objectively and not over stated as a success or we will be guilty of the same thing that you mentioned people are doing with ESC research.
  • Actually, with adult stem cell therapy, it's usually a matter of the mainline press not taking off on such stories, ever. You rarely if ever year anything about them from the places most people get their info (ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, PBS, NPR, NYT, Washington Post, et al). But you hear plenty of hype and promotion of ESC research from them.

    Yours is a worthwhile caution, but given the laughable over-hype of ESC research, adult stem cell therapy advocates would pretty much have to claim it will make us immoral before they could reach the same level of overstatement .
  • Brian Rutledge
    Got a good chuckle out of the possibility of some idgit standing up and claiming adult stem cells will make us immoral. On the other hand, someone, somewhere with a microphone or camera in front of them will probably blurt it out.

    Science ' news reporting ' is an absurd concept anyway, since they ALWAYS get it wrong except in the rarest of situations. Very similiar to ALL the other news reported as well. I don't trust any of it, liberal or conservative.People are out for their own personal gain and the press and TV news stations are the epitome of it.
  • Now that I look at my misspelling, I'm sure that was funny. :-). Meant to say "immortal." Amazing the critical difference one little letter can make, eh?
  • Brian Rutledge
    While this is exciting, this procedure can't yet be considered a successful medical therapy, as suggested by Mr. Ellis, until 5 or more years have past to see if bone continues to fully grow and then it must be strong, stable bone.That is what the actual doctors said in the article.

    New cheek bones were reconstructed from cadaver bone and placed in the cheek area and then the stem cells were injected into holes drilled into the cadaver bones. The article and the doctors, as in all of medical science,are careful never to refer to something as a successful cure until all the facts are in.They even said the treatment has a little better than 50% chance of working. Exciting ? Very much so.Successful therapy? Time will tell.
  • They never refer to something successful...unless it's ESC-related and can be fueled into enough hype to make us believe embryonic stem cell research can cure paralysis, acne, premature ejaculation, ED, obesity and ugliness...all with a single bound. The pooh-pooh approach to such successes as this one when compared to the miracle-like talk about embryonic stem cell research is, um, remarkable.

    Anything to hold out some sliver of hope that embryonic stem cell therapy might someday, maybe, possibly save face, no matter how minuscule and nebulous that hope, right?
  • Brian Rutledge
    I don't see the research being done by scientists doing ESC research and those scientists doing Adult Stem Cell research as a 'they' versus 'we' scenario. Some scientists are interested in one line of research and some scientists are interested in another line of research. They are not interested in proving the other side wrong, but only in hoping to further their own areas of reserach to benefit mankind

    Those of us on the the sidelines are chosing sides, often due to moral beliefs, and have every right to do so. It appears with all the recent advances in adult stem cell research that it holds enormous promise and is showing great advances. But whether or not adult cells turn out to be a great benefit to mankind is independant of whether ESC research has anything to offer.Although related, the research is inherently different.

    Remember it was the men, who deeply hope that this bone treatment works, that were simply stating it is too early to claim success. This is just a typical , honest statement by scientists who know not to prematurely make ' success' claims.
  • Some caution--especially on the part of the developers--is definitely called for; after all, few of us like to tout our success...only to see our efforts go down in flames

    Yet I don't think they would be talking to the press at all unless they didn't see very positive signs and very respectable odds for success.

    I just find it interesting that adult stem cell therapies get little or no mainline media coverage, while the media and pro-ESC research elements in politics bring out the orchestra anytime the slightest thing is said about embryonic stem cell research...even though it has yet to produce anything but empty promises, ended human lives, and more health problems.

    Given the destruction of innocent human life alone we should not be pursuing this line of human experimentation. And when you throw in the practical hurdles, along with the tremendous successes of an alternate line of research which even some in the MSM admit renders ESC research unnecessary, it strikes me as the height of moral and practical irresponsibility to continue wasting time and resources (and the moral fiber of our nation) on this dubious path.
  • Linked to your post from Discerning Science - Human Life - Adult Stem Cells There are still many people who have not gotten this important information, that "Adult Stem Cells" are the ones that hold promise and "Embryonic Stem Cells" do not.

    California even though it is unable to pay for basic services is throwing away tons of money on "Embryonic Stem Cell" research. While people who actually are making accomplishments with adult stem cells are worthy of investments.
blog comments powered by Disqus