Does God Expect Me to Stay Married to a Jerk?

S. Michael Craven

S. Michael Craven

S. Michael Craven
Center for Christ & Culture

Years ago, a family therapist was asked, “What are the top three causes of divorce?” to which he replied, “Selfishness, selfishness, selfishness!” Of course this is an oversimplification of the varied and many contributing factors to divorce but there is an element of truth in this statement that permeates each.

At the core of all that ails the human race is selfishness: this innate love of self—self-worship—or pride. We alienate ourselves from one another when we elevate our desires, our opinions, and our feelings above others. We cheat and steal because we want, we lie and deceive because we give priority to our self-interests, we murder—in actuality or with words—because our puny sense of supremacy is threatened. This is the very sin that separates us from God: our love of self over and against the Father. In short, we are deplorably selfish beings consumed with satisfying our own appetites and desires, often without regard for anyone else.

This is the dreadful state in which the Lord finds us—and despite our active resistance to his rightful rule in our hearts, our thoughts, and actions, he lovingly subdues our rebellious pride with his grace and mercy. He saves us from eternal alienation that our stubborn resistance brings! The old man, so infatuated with himself, is crucified and buried with Christ; we are raised to a new life in Christ (see Romans 6:4). However, this new life doesn’t just happen. Our will, once in bondage to sin, has been freed to pursue godliness in obedience to Christ through faith. Paul, writing to the church at Ephesus, tells us that we are to be taught to cast away our “old self” and “to be made new in the attitude of your minds; and to put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness” (Ephesians 4:22–24, NIV). C. S. Lewis summed it up in saying, “To become new men means losing what we now call ourselves” (Mere Christianity).

The clearest clue to what this new self looks like is given in Paul’s letter to the Philippians when he writes, “Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus: Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness” (Philippians 2:5–7, NIV). This is a radical departure from our selfish nature into one that denies self even in the face of offense. This same nature is, of course, the foundation for marriage—but also all relationships.

j0442424In Ephesians, Paul lays out the foundation of marriage as being rooted in a mutual love and submission, “Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord” and “Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her” (Ephesians 5:22, 25, NIV). Notice also that Paul begins this chapter with the charge to “Be imitators of God,” another reference to the disposition described in Philippians chapter two. Later in his letter to the Ephesians, Paul compares this joining of two people into “one flesh” to that of Christ and his bride, the church (see Ephesians 5:32). Thus marriage—this “profound mystery,” according to Paul—transcends anything resembling a mere contractual obligation. Nor is marriage simply a self-serving means to personal happiness; Christian couples should strive for and display this self-denying disposition.

Another aspect that should govern Christian marriage is the doctrine of God’s sovereignty.

Do we believe that when we suffer, we suffer outside the will of God, or do we believe that God allows suffering to enter our lives for his good purpose? Isn’t there the expectation that we, too, will share in the sufferings of Christ, that “we must through many tribulations enter the kingdom of God” (Acts 14:22, NKJV)? While we do not eagerly seek to suffer, don’t we believe that suffering bears sweet fruit nourished by bitter tears and that such fruit is nothing less than holy character (see Romans 5:2–4)? If we believe that God in his providence causes everything to “work together for the good of those who love God and are called according to his purpose” (Romans 8:28, NLT), then wouldn’t it be reasonable to conclude that such suffering may also come in the form of a troubled marriage?

That being the case, wouldn’t we be expected to persevere rather than seek escape, trusting God for both endurance and the outcome? It is here—in the domain of our so-called domestic happiness—that we may be tempted to draw a boundary, saying, in essence, “Lord, you may come this far but no farther.” It is often in this context that the old self returns in an effort to assert his rights: “I need, I want, I deserve!” However, the Christian is compelled to lay down these rights and instead trust in God, believing that his grace is indeed sufficient in all things including an oppressive and loveless marriage. It is here that the Christian patiently endures, trusting the Lord for the grace to do so, and hopes for a future where God may be pleased to set things right.

Please do not think I am suggesting that the person suffering physical abuse remain in a situation whereby he or she is subjected to physical harm. I am not! However, that is a topic for another time, as I am presently addressing divorce for no other reason than the failure to achieve personal “happiness.” This is where we Christians either begin to differ from the world or remain worldly. The Christian life does not culminate in a quest to be happy but to be holy!

If our attitude is to be the same as that of Christ Jesus, then consider how Jesus responds to his frequently unfaithful bride, the church. Every one of us has, at some point, been unfaithful to Christ; we have wantonly rebelled against him, we have been indifferent, even abusive in our disregard toward him. We have all failed to love him at times and we constantly put our needs ahead of his. And yet Jesus never says to us, “That’s it, I’ve had it! I will not take this abuse anymore; you are selfish and uncaring; you don’t love me or make me feel special, so I am out of here!” Can you imagine these words coming out of the Savior’s mouth? Never!

So it is to be with us. For those poor souls who walk in darkness, there is no chance of assuming the self-denying character of Christ; but for those whom Christ has made alive, there is the all-sufficient well of grace. It is to Christ that the Christ-follower must go with his “irreconcilable differences,” not to the courts. It is only Christ who reconciles the unrighteous with the righteous and it is Christ that can reconcile husband and wife.

The question for the church is this: Will we truly trust him in all things, including while we suffer through marital maelstroms? Will we follow Christ when it is most difficult? If we won’t, then not only will we fail in our witness, we will never know the freedom of living by faith.

S. Michael Craven is the President of the Center for Christ & Culture. Michael is the author of Uncompromised Faith (Navpress).The Center for Christ & Culture is dedicated to renewal within the Church and works to equip Christians with an intelligent and thoroughly Christian approach to matters of culture in order to demonstrate the relevance of Christianity to all of life. For more information on the Center for Christ & Culture, the teaching ministry of S. Michael Craven, visit the Center for Christ & Culture.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • frank
    A lot of people are comparing physical and mental abused as the same. Well they both are methods of abuse, but the effect of the abused is different than the other. This is where the author draws a line, and is completely understandable. You can't compared a person got into a hospital with several cuts, and maybe a fatal wound, then a person with low self esteem, and depression. Yes, for those debators out there. yes depression can lead to self physical abused, but depending on a point of view you are looking at it, depression and low self esteem, is within the person, not with the aggressor. The author see the difference, and refers to the physical abused subject to be explained at a different time. Most marriages now in days are based from a society point of view, which leads to a more self pleasure and 'I'm getting old" or "We have a son" kind of theme, so in reality a lot of marriages were created for the wrong reasons to start with, where failure is a matter of time. The contradicting point about this point of view, is how can a young couple understand the difference between seasonal people and long time relationship? I have seen thousands of couples getting divorce in matter of months after they got married. Coincidently, everytime i asked them, why did you get married in the first place, 6/10 give the same answer "I though I love her/him". So i say, "If you though, then you never did", and they say "Now I know" Young couples rush into marriage, based on a couple months of dealing with a fun, nice, smart, considered of my feeling kind of type person, but who is there to say this is the person for you. In conclusion, is obvious, that there is no magical word that can let you know who is the person you should married, but God gives you enough signs to know, but lets be real, young couples usually don't see or understand the signs of God, because as they feel in love, they don't care about the rest.
  • brianrutledge
    The author makes many good points, but I noticed when the topic of what a married person should do if they were involved in a physically abusive marriage, was brought up, he felt it would best be discussed at another time. Maybe that's true or maybe it's too difficult a subject theologically to discuss. Suffering is suffering, whether it be mental abuse or physical abuse, unless the Bible discerns between the two which it well could and I am ignorant of it.

    I agree that the Christian couple should try to resolve the suffering by turning to the Church. but here the author drops the ball in practical terms. How much does the wife say.... put up with a severely verbal or physically abusive husband ? It is easy for the author to say trust in the Chuch, but there he stops.He offers nothing further. What if the suffering still isn't resloved or how long does one endure abuse. He avoids the tougher questions. Maybe the person then must rely on pure reason and free will to decide when to get out.
  • DCM
    What to do in an abusive marriage is a subject in and of itself, and thus truly would be a bit much to cover in this particular article. To touch on it a little: the proper response to certain issues, such as abuse, is generally to set boundaries: "Until you get help & show that you're serious about changing in this area, you are out of this house." This is something I failed to do when I was married to someone whose behavior was unacceptable, although if I had done this it might have just hastened the inevitable. The point is, it's not just a matter of how long you "put up with it" in the Christian context; there are steps that can be taken.
  • brianrutledge
    DCM You really hit on a point of whether to stay together or the 'you are out of the house until...' approach and does the latter aproach just prolong the inevitable. I guess only a crystal ball could answer that one.Either way, it is painful.
  • DCM
    The point of the "out of the house until" approach (or something similar) is that it lets the abusive/unfaithful/etc. spouse know there are consequences to their actions, and forces them to make a choice that they'd otherwise get away without facing: shape up & keep the benefits of marriage, or go their own way & lose the benefits. If done right it could prevent many a divorce, provided the abused/cheated on/etc. partner is willing to face their own contributions to the problem. It could also keep an inevitably doomed marriage (of which mine was a prime example) from being prolonged, though hopefully this would have to be the case less often.

    Ultimately, though, all I'm trying to say is that troubled marriages do not simply need to be endured for the sake of "doing what's right"; there are options for dealing with them, and that's where the REAL "right" things come in.
  • DCM
    Even at its best, marriage is not about finding a perfect "soul-mate" who'll meet your every need naturally. Far too many people fail to understand that going into it.

    I strong recommend the article at the below link. It's kind of long, but it says some things about marriage that just don't get said enough.

    http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=...
blog comments powered by Disqus