Christianity and American Government

John Jay, first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court

John Jay, first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court

Probe Ministries has a great compilation on the inextricable connection between American government and the Christian worldview.

Probe Ministries creates small 1-minute radio spots that play on many Christian radio stations. When a series is complete, they compile them on their website so you can take them in altogether.

You can listen to this important series here.

The series points out that the United States is not a “Christian nation” in the sense of a theocracy as many Muslim nations are; in fact, that is the sense expressed between the United States and several Muslim nations in the Treaty of Tripoli.

However, in the sense that our nation was founded by Christians on Christian principles enlightened by a Christian worldview, America was undeniably (to anyone reasonable, that is) founded a Christian nation. Whether that is still true or not is debatable, since we have for more than 50 years allowed secularists and God-haters to wage an unrelenting campaign against our nation’s history, Constitution and against the expression of Christianity in public.

The series quotes John Adams, an author of independence and our second president, as to the importance of religion and morality to the health and longevity of our republic.

We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

George Washington in his Farewell Address is also quoted on this theme:

And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

Contrary to revisionist lies claiming the founders were a bunch of deists and secularists, the vast majority of the founders were most assuredly serious, committed Christians who understood how important the Christian worldview was to the maintenance of our freedom and our republic.

The importance of this truth cannot be overstated. One of the most unique things about the American form of government is that while it acknowledges the fallen nature of humanity and the tendency toward evil, the very freedoms we enjoy are contingent on a society of people who understand the need to control ones self, to restrain ones self from evil; only a moral, religious people can have any hope of doing so. A people that can restrain themselves from evil through the dictates of conscience has less need of a strong, authoritarian government. A people who live for license and intend to get away with everything they possibly can will naturally need a strong, authoritarian government to maintain order and to protect other citizens from the egregious employment of personal license.

Unfortunately, these last 50 years of our war on God have illustrated the proof of this truth, in both the growth of crime and corruption, and in the growth of government power. And the loss of freedom.

Daniel Webster reiterated these truths:

Lastly, our ancestors established their system of government on morality and religious sentiment. Moral habits, they believed, cannot safely be trusted on any other foundation than religious principle, nor any government be secure which is not supported by moral habits. . . .Whatever makes men good Christians, makes them good citizens.

Probe also cites John Jay, one of the authors of the Federalist Papers and first Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court:

Providence has given to our people the choice of their rulers, and it is the duty, as well as the privilege and interest of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their rulers.

It stands to reason that if you have a nation whose government is founded on Christian principles (as ours is), the best choice for leaders in that government is men who believe in those principles. On the other hand, if you choose immoral or amoral men for leaders, you will get immoral or amoral leadership–as we have seen.

Probe points out that even the least religious of the founders like Thomas Jefferson were deeply influenced by the Christian worldview. The English jurist William Blackstone and his Commentaries on the Laws of England were among Jefferson’s favorites.

It was Blackstone who referred famously to the Natural Law (i.e. the law of nature and Nature’s God)

“as man depends absolutely upon his Maker for everything, it is necessary that he should, in all points, conform to his Maker’s will. This will of his Maker is called the law of nature.”

Blackstone also wasn’t shy about acknowledging that God’s truth was revealed in both nature and in specific revelation in the Bible–and that all good law depends on this ultimate Law:

Upon these two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws.

Whether you know something of America’s rich Christian heritage and foundations, or whether you’ve been misled by the secular revisionists who wish this had never been (to their own detriment, they are unable to understand), consider taking the time to read or listen to this important Probe series.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • either way you get corrupt leaders, doesn't matter if they profess a belief in god or not.Some of the worst evils of all time have been perpetuated by "godly" men of faith.And it has been proven time and again that shoving your version of morality down your fellow man's throat by force, is never a good idea.
  • Really? Do you have the slightest clue of what you're talking about? When did John Jay, John Adams, George Washington, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Abraham Baldwin, Benjamin Franklin, Patrick Henry, Charles Carroll, Thomas Jefferson, Daniel Webster, Joseph Story, Gouverneur Morris, Alexander Hamilton, Jeremiah Smith, John Witherspoon, or any other of the Founders "perpetrate evil" on our nation (all were men of faith--even Jefferson and Franklin to some degree) or "shove their version of morality down their fellow man's throat by force (after all, they all clearly stated how important morality, religion and specifically the Christian faith was to the good health and maintenance of our republic)?

    Perhaps you've been dining on too much secularist revisionist propaganda...
  • Brian Rutledge
    DCM You are correct if that's how my 'logic' came across. I also agree that their focus on the Christian worldview never contributed anything negative to the founding of our government. I meant to imply that many of their personal worldviews were wrong and that those founders who ascribed to the idea that the Christian world view was the only factor they used to form the basics of the Constitution, were wrong as well . These men had many worldview influences in their lifes.Maybe they just didn't publicly voice that studies like philosophy, the Enlightenment, history etc. also played a significant role in their thought process. Maybe just their religious thoughts have been selectively quote mined on occasion and their more secular underpinnings left out.
  • Brian Rutledge
    In the main, our founding fathers were Christians. It is simply who they were and it is no surprise that their personal belief was that for this country to have a chance to survive, their own Christian world view would best advance their cause. They were also white men, operating in a male dominated society, who felt that men would best be suited to run the government. As much as ...say... a John Adams loved and respected his Abigail, he would have been aghast at the thought of her running for President.

    Women couldn't even vote. Wasn't even an issue. This was simply the beliefs and times in which these men lived. Slavery was becoming a contentious issue even at the time the Constitution was written, but it was a subject the founders felt should best be left alone at the time.The thought of a black man becoming President wasn't even in their minds.They would have thought it preposterous. It was simply the times,worldview and mindset in which they lived.

    These great men had many personal beliefs which formed their worldview and how that view should effect our country, but many of these views were wrong. They managed to carve out a fantastic document and should be given credit for that, but we also need to be aware that many many of their personal beliefs were wrong as far as government is concerned.All they knew was a white, male dominated, Christian world view. That was their world--one we recognize today as far too limited in scope and truth
  • WXRGina
    At the risk of offending a large number of people, I ask, what is so good about women being in positions of authority? Throughout the Scriptures and world history, positions of authority are held by men (regardless of race). Of course, there are exceptions (the Queen of Sheba is one), I am not a neanderthal, but men are the natural leaders; women have their proper roles in supportive positions. There is nothing denigrating about this.

    Read the Word of the Lord to Isaiah in chapter 3, verse 12:
    "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths."

    Look at the women in leadership positions in our own government. Somehow, they seem even worse than the men. They simply don't belong there. Woe to our country because of them. Our country is being overrun by women assuming positions of leadership, historically held by men: police chiefs, fire chiefs, high-ranking military officials, and the list goes on. And, our country is spiraling out of control by moral decay and the feminization of our entire culture. I am not saying that women have less intelligence than men. I am simply saying they have no business being in high positions of authority.

    Gina Miller
  • Brian Rutledge
    Gina I respect your views and I guess you must accept that God is 'male' by nature. God is referred to as He, the Father and the Bible is indeed a patriarchal society.So therefore God chose men to lead, becasue He was 'male'. But we believe that the true essence of God is not made of matter, but is spiritual. I am curious how a spiritual entity in essence, capable of all things, could be 'male' oriented. Does It not have ALL qualities ?
  • WXRGina
    Brian,

    Because God is a spirit Being, why does that mean He cannot be male? I guess if you do not believe the Bible, the Word of God, then you can imagine anything you like of Him, but your belief (or unbelief) will not change Who He is. However, if you believe His Word, you cannot conclude that He is anything but a male Being. Was Jesus lying when He called God His Father? I think not.

    God established humanity. He created us male and female for His own purposes. He gave the male to be the head of the female, because she is the weaker creature. We did not design this system, He did. We can rebel against God's perfect plan for humanity all we want, but we do so at our own peril.

    He desires the best for us all, even though most people will never accept Him and get it. We are the ones who screw up His marvelous plan for us.

    Gina Miller
  • Brian Rutledge
    Gina,

    Because God is a spiritual being and God created both men and women and all their feelings and characteristics, that means God, of course, has all these characteristics in It's own being as well. If God has all these characteristics as part of It's essence-all the characteristics of men and women which God must have in order to create them-then which characteristics make God male.Is not God endowed with all feelings, emotions and characteristics of men and women ?God can decide to be whatever It wants to be so did God make the decision to be male ?

    God was not created or born a certain way like us. God has free reign to be what It wants so you claim God just wants to be male?
  • WXRGina
    Brian,

    I can plainly see the futility of this argument with you. We are coming at this from two different universes. I take the Word of God at face value, and you obviously do not believe God's Word. I know that God is infinitely bigger than we can possibly imagine. We cannot get our minds around Him; even the concept of eternity or infinity is impossible for us to grasp.

    Brian wrote: "...that means God, of course, has all these characteristics..."
    "...which God must have in order to create them..."

    Here, you are making some pretty bold assumptions. Where do you get your information that "God must have" or "God, of course has?" What you are doing is projecting your own limited human perception on God, Who is infinitely larger than our small imaginations. He is certainly not bound by our ideas of Him.

    Throughout the Word of God, He is referred to in the masculine. Jesus calls Him "Father." Why does Jesus call Him "Father?" Please do not answer that; it's rhetorical.

    There is no reason to further pursue this pointless and silly debate with you, so I will quit.

    Gina Miller
  • Brian Rutledge
    Your right. We can't project our own limited human perception on God. Who knows, maybe God projected 'himslf' as male so we,as humans, could grasp 'him'. But we are limited and will never know God's essence until death.
  • DCM
    Interesting logic -- their thinking was limited & therefore wrong; and since it included a Christian focus, that focus was wrong! OK, so that's probably not really the logic you're trying to use. But I have yet to see it demonstrated how the founding fathers' Christian worldview contributed anything negative -- even just in the sense of being limited or only of that time -- to what America has been. For that matter, I have yet to see it demonstrated how a genuine New Testament worldview contributes ANYTHING negative to ANYTHING. Unpopular, maybe; but not negative. As Galatians says, against the good fruits of godliness there can be no law.
blog comments powered by Disqus