swingers

hidden cam

live sex chat

Adult Webcam

Bondage Webcams

BBW Webcams

Adult Dating

adult chat

adult web chat

personals online

webcam girls

sex web camera

Adult dating websites

lesbian webcams

Adult Webcams


“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” – Samuel Adams

NASA Study Shows Sun Responsible for Planet Warming

(Credit: Robert A. Rohde)

Click to enlarge (Credit: Robert A. Rohde)

From DailyTech, we have still more evidence that any warming occurring on planet earth is coming from natural sources and is cyclic in nature–NOT from the evil capitalism that Al Gore, the UN politicians at the IPCC and other socialists love to blame.

From the article:

Now, a new research report from a surprising source may help to lay this skepticism to rest. A study from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland looking at climate data over the past century has concluded that solar variation has made a significant impact on the Earth’s climate. The report concludes that evidence for climate changes based on solar radiation can be traced back as far as the Industrial Revolution.

Past research has shown that the sun goes through eleven year cycles. At the cycle’s peak, solar activity occurring near sunspots is particularly intense, basking the Earth in solar heat. According to Robert Cahalan, a climatologist at the Goddard Space Flight Center, “Right now, we are in between major ice ages, in a period that has been called the Holocene.”

If our media, culture and a large portion of the “scientific” community were really honest, it would be the worshippers of the religion of anthropogenic global warming who are called “skeptics,” wouldn’t it?

Because it is those pushing this silly theory that our puny SUVs and power plants are causing earth to warm up when the most obvious source of heat hangs over their head every single day.

AGW simply doesn’t pass the smell test. Nor does it line up with the objective data.

sunspot_numbers
Click to enlarge (Credit: Robert A. Rohde)

As this graph shows, solar activity has been cyclic in nature going back hundreds of years.  Solar activity is also increasing, and we are coming out of the “Little Ice Age” of just a few hundred years ago. Of course the planet is warming–we’re coming out of a cold spell! The Maunder Minimum period of diminished solar activity coincided with the Little Ice Age when Europe and North America experienced bitterly cold winters.

About 1,000 years ago, Greenland was warm enough for the Vikings to colonize and grow vineyards.  Today Greenland is almost entirely covered in ice.  Tell me: is the earth warmer today than it was 1,000 years ago?  Did they have SUVs and coal power plants in the days of the Vikings?  This isn’t tough to figure out, people.

The only thing tough about the global warming debate is trying to get the facts to match the socialist agenda of the AGW proponents.  Try as they might, they just can’t do it, and more and more people are starting to see that.

Things like cyclic solar data, warming occurring on other planets such as Mars and Jupiter just don’t line up with the suppositions of the AGW worshippers.  They craft all manner of complex calculations and “what ifs,” but in the end the best they can do is say things like, “Well, we can’t prove it now, but by the time we can, it’ll be too late.”

And we’re supposed to watch our electric bills go up 40% and see our economy devastated on what-ifs and a bunch of garbage that not only doesn’t match the evidence but doesn’t even pass the smell test?

I’m not as gullible as these shysters seem to think I am, and I don’t believe most of the American people are either.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.


DiggStumbleUponYahoo BuzzFacebookRedditYahoo BookmarksNewsVineTwitterGoogle ReaderGoogle GmailEmailYahoo MailShare
  • Ken

    In 1976 I began work as an analyst for underground mine air in Rockhampton, Australia. Air in ventilated parts of coal mines is close to fresh air in composition so I used fresh air taken from outside the lab to help set up the Carle 311M gas chromatograph. That instrument was specially set up for mine air analysis and was easily capable of measuring CO2 down to the part per million level.

    We were on the eastern edge of the town and the breezes generally came from the east. Apart from a few farms, the next object of interest in that direction was the Pacific Ocean about 25 miles away. I soon found that the CO2 concentration in the air was higher than the literature value in a book published by the British National Coal Board in 1966. About 1978 I first heard of the possibility of global warming from increasing CO2 concentrations, that was long before I had heard of Al Gore. At the time, I thought the idea far-fetched.

    Over the next 13 years I saw CO2 increase steadily. I became concerned that I was getting some kind of error from the equipment and checked it all as much as I could. I also contacted the Baseline Monitoring Station at Cape Grim, Tasmania to ask if they were seeing the same sort of thing. They were. Their advice was that my results were accurate and that on average, CO2 in the air was increasing by about 1ppm per year. However it varies a little with latitude, season etc.

    My last analyses done in late September 1989 showed CO2 concentrations of 360ppm. I still thought the idea of global warming dubious but it clearly was not far-fetched. According to recent reports, CO2 in the air is now around 380 – 400ppm depending on latitude, season etc.

    There is simple and direct physical mechanism known for a century which shows absorption of long wavelength infra-red radiation by CO2 increases with concentrarion of CO2. This relation is so reliable that it is made the basis of some instruments intended to analyse gas mixtures for CO2. It is indisputable, the postman might not know about it but all chemists do.

    This story of contribution by the Sun has been around a while and there may be some truth in it. I am not qualified to comment. However I have heard that while the radiation from the Sun actually decreased a little in 1998, global temperatures continued to rise. But there is one thing for certain, CO2 is increasing, and increasing CO2 inevitably means more absorption of long wavelength infra-red radiation. Chemistry and physics work independently of politics.

  • Ken

    In 1976 I began work as an analyst for underground mine air in Rockhampton, Australia. Air in ventilated parts of coal mines is close to fresh air in composition so I used fresh air taken from outside the lab to help set up the Carle 311M gas chromatograph. That instrument was specially set up for mine air analysis and was easily capable of measuring CO2 down to the part per million level.

    We were on the eastern edge of the town and the breezes generally came from the east. Apart from a few farms, the next object of interest in that direction was the Pacific Ocean about 25 miles away. I soon found that the CO2 concentration in the air was higher than the literature value in a book published by the British National Coal Board in 1966. About 1978 I first heard of the possibility of global warming from increasing CO2 concentrations, that was long before I had heard of Al Gore. At the time, I thought the idea far-fetched.

    Over the next 13 years I saw CO2 increase steadily. I became concerned that I was getting some kind of error from the equipment and checked it all as much as I could. I also contacted the Baseline Monitoring Station at Cape Grim, Tasmania to ask if they were seeing the same sort of thing. They were. Their advice was that my results were accurate and that on average, CO2 in the air was increasing by about 1ppm per year. However it varies a little with latitude, season etc.

    My last analyses done in late September 1989 showed CO2 concentrations of 360ppm. I still thought the idea of global warming dubious but it clearly was not far-fetched. According to recent reports, CO2 in the air is now around 380 – 400ppm depending on latitude, season etc.

    There is simple and direct physical mechanism known for a century which shows absorption of long wavelength infra-red radiation by CO2 increases with concentrarion of CO2. This relation is so reliable that it is made the basis of some instruments intended to analyse gas mixtures for CO2. It is indisputable, the postman might not know about it but all chemists do.

    This story of contribution by the Sun has been around a while and there may be some truth in it. I am not qualified to comment. However I have heard that while the radiation from the Sun actually decreased a little in 1998, global temperatures continued to rise. But there is one thing for certain, CO2 is increasing, and increasing CO2 inevitably means more absorption of long wavelength infra-red radiation. Chemistry and physics work independently of politics.