“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!” – Samuel Adams

Arctic Scientist: IPCC Ignores Natural Causes of Global Warming

j0434075Yesterday I discussed a recent article from the science journal PLoS ONE on their findings about the number of scientists who fabricate and falsify research.

Any rational person realizes that, despite their education and professional experience, scientists are like any other human being and face the same temptations as anyone else.  Just as we all face the temptation to lie and twist facts to our advantage, scientists are no exception.

The findings from the PLoS ONE article indicate that a significant number of scientists have fabricated research information (1.97% admit to doing it themselves) and more than a third admit to utilizing questionable research practices.

As I said yesterday, nowhere is fact-twisting and deception seen more prevalently than in the evolution debate and the anthropogenic global warming debate.  In both of these areas, a grain of objective factual information is buried in the thick padding of assumptions and conjecture before being presented to the unsuspecting public as “established fact.”

Today geophysicist Syun Akasofu of the International Arctic Research Center in Fairbanks, Alaska published an article at Climate Realists which highlights the selective fact-twisting of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and their push to promote the theory of anthropogenic global warming.

2. For their purpose, the IPCC ignored the fact that the Earth went through a cold period called “the Little Ice Age” from 1400 to 1800.

3. The Earth has been recovering from the Little Ice Age from 1800 to the present. A recovery from a cold period is warming. It is mostly this warming that is causing the present climate change and it is not man-made. If they admit the existence of the Little Ice Age, they cannot claim that the global average temperature unexpectedly increased from 1900.

He also points out the inconvenient truth that recent warming began to occur long before there were SUVs and coal power plants, most likely as a part of the warming trend after the Little Ice Age.

Temperatures are also not cooperating with the apostles of global warming religion:

9. Although the IPCC predicted that by the year 2100 the temperature will increase 3~6°C, the temperature has stopped increasing after 2000 and shows even a decreasing sign.

Isn’t that terrible when facts ruin a good theory?

There is a host of contradictory evidence which points to natural, cyclic causes behind any planetary warming. These range from the climate data going back thousands of years, to the correlations with solar activity, to warming occurring on Mars and Jupiter and other planets in the solar system.

This outrageous trend of deception from the scientific community is flushing what remaining credibility they have down the toilet.  Sadly, they are so devoted to promoting illusions to support their ideological biases, most of them are oblivious to the fact that more and more people are recognizing that their global warming emperor has no clothes.


Try us out at the new location: American Clarion!


16 Responses to “Arctic Scientist: IPCC Ignores Natural Causes of Global Warming”

  1. more domestic terrorism and traitor to our military aka thanks for the white trash

  2. We American are making a major mistake by relying upon the United Nations, a political organization, for their scientific assessments. Please see http://www.energyplanusa.com for why the IPCC reports don't pass the smell test.

  3. I can remeber back in the 80's, I use to fly from place to place working for the oil company's. Back then the sky's were clear and blue and you could see for miles. The only real brown spots in the sky were when you came to the big cities. Now twenty something years later it really makes me kinda sick and sad t the same time, there are no more blue sky's no matter where you are or how high you go, it's just all this kinda brown haze. Aarrhhh it really makes my stomach turn “blah”……so for all you nay sayers all you really have to do is JUST LOOK UP AND OPEN YOUR EYES!!

  4. Maybe you live in some nasty area, but where I live and for hundreds of miles around, it's clear blue clean sky.

  5. Yes it might be down to that but the increase in melting ice in the arctic circle cant all be down to natural warming humans are using resorces more than ever and that must be efecting it

  6. That Koolaid is yummy, huh?

  7. What global 'little ice age'??
    How many years to 2100?
    Exactly how many instruments are measuring the temperature on Mars and Jupiter?
    Where are those instruments positioned?
    How often in the last 100 years have there been 'cooling' periods?
    Who exactly is fabricating research?
    Is it ok for Christians to make allegations of lying without presenting the evidence?

    Just a little research in the last 12 months from around the world regarding solar activity and cosmic rays:

    Richard A. Kerr. Study Challenges Cosmic Ray-Climate Link. Science, 2009; 324 (5927): 576

    Solar activity and the mean global temperature A D Erlykin et al 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 014006 (5pp)

    Lean, J.L., and D.H. Rind, 2008: How natural and anthropogenic influences alter global and regional surface temperatures: 1889 to 2006. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L18701,

    Testing the proposed causal link between cosmic rays and cloud cover T Sloan et al 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 024001 (6pp)

  8. You seem to have an awful lot of skepticism toward the pretty universally acknowledged Little Ice Age, not to mention the uncontested warming occurring on Mars, Jupiter and other planets.

    What a pity you seem intellectually incapable of applying a similar degree of skepticism to the largely unfounded theory of anthropogenic global warming.

    I'd like to challenge you to enter a whole new realm of objectivity by looking at both sides of the argument, both on the basis of scientific findings and through the lens of pure common sense. If you do, I guarantee an eye-opening experience for you.

  9. I asked about a GLOBAL ‘little ice age’, occurring at the same time.
    Again how much instrumentation is measuring Mars and Jupiters temperatures?
    What temperature was it in the Northern hemisphere of Jupiter in Dec 2007?
    What was happening inside Jupiters atmosphere in Dec 2007?
    Was it the same in the Southern hemisphere in the same month?
    On what surface would the measurement be taken?

  10. So somehow all of the scientists who work for the cause of the IPCC are biased and cheat while all of the scientists who are funded by conservative causes and organizations such as the Heartland Institute are pure and honest. Now that makes a lot of sense to me.

    This fantasy about global warming on other planets is the creation of a political movement and not any real science.

  11. The IPCC is a politica body, not a scientific one. And yes, it has been in vogue for some time in the “scientific” community to formulate a political/ideological goal and then twist the objective data to form highly subjective and extremely speculative conclusions.

    And if you don't like the Heartland Institute, perhaps you might consider checking with the more than 30,000 scientists who have gone on record against the conclusions of the IPCC.

    Oh, and that “fantasy” about global warming on other planets,do you suppose NASA–the source of the information–is just a propaganda arm of the Heartland Institute?

  12. Sure, there is an increase in the melting of ice in the artic area but then how do you explain the drastic record increase in the ice shelves of the antiartic circle. Global Warming (or now known as climate change -because the general public is not buying into this nonsense) is cyclical in nature and has no connection whatsoever to CO2 and greenhouse gas emittions as Al Gore claims. Over 34,000 scientists in reference to a recent Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine Report signed a petition stating that “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of Carbon Dioxide , methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will cause in the future, catastophic heating of the earths atmosphere and disruption of the earths climate” The IPCC report on Global Warming is based on manipulated, distorted and exaggerated scientific data, primarily for political purposes. What happened to Global Cooling the 1980's. Same type of crisis–same hoax!!

  13. Sure, there is an increase in the melting of ice in the artic area but then how do you explain the drastic record increase in the ice shelves of the antiartic circle. Global Warming (or now known as climate change -because the general public is not buying into this nonsense) is cyclical in nature and has no connection whatsoever to CO2 and greenhouse gas emittions as Al Gore claims. Over 34,000 scientists in reference to a recent Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine Report signed a petition stating that “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of Carbon Dioxide , methane or other greenhouse gases is causing or will cause in the future, catastophic heating of the earths atmosphere and disruption of the earths climate” The IPCC report on Global Warming is based on manipulated, distorted and exaggerated scientific data, primarily for political purposes. What happened to Global Cooling the 1980's. Same type of crisis–same hoax!!