Still More on Diminished Solar Activity and Global Cooling

Sunspot activity captured by TRACE spacecraft. The bright glowing gas flowing around the sunspots has a temperature of over 1.8 million degrees Fahrenheit (Credit: NASA)

Sunspot activity captured by the TRACE spacecraft. The bright glowing gas flowing around the sunspots has a temperature of over 1.8 million degrees Fahrenheit (Credit: NASA)

As more and more real scientific data comes in, and we are able to move further and further beyond the mythology and high-hopes of global warming high priest Al Gore, it becomes clearer and clearer that the public has been fed a massive campaign of hooey for the past 20 years.

Just a few days ago we looked at the extensive report from the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine which showed the correlation between temperature change and solar activity.  Not only does current science show this, but the examination of historical climate data shows up-and-down climate cycles across the earth long before SUVs and power plants were ever dreamed of.

Just yesterday Space Daily featured an article about the recent diminished solar activity:

According to the forecast, the sun should remain generally calm for at least another year. From a research point of view, that’s good news because solar minimum has proven to be more interesting than anyone imagined. Low solar activity has a profound effect on Earth’s atmosphere, allowing it to cool and contract.

Earlier this month Fox News also ran a story reported in National Geographic News about reduced sunspot activity and the (coincidental) cooling of late:

And there may be a link to global warming — or, in this case, cooling. Current theories link an earlier solar quiet time to the “Little Ice Age,” a cold snap that lasted from about 1300 to 1800 in Europe and North America.

During such “solar minimums,” as they’re called, the sun dims a bit, magnetic activity is reduced and solar storms are fewer. No one knows how long each will last until it’s over.

The Maunder Minimum, a period of extremely low sunspot activity from about 1645 to 1715, coincided with the coldest part of the Little Ice Age, when Dutch canals regularly froze during the winter.

This past January, the Dutch canals again froze, for the first time in 16 years.

The planet has been generally warming from that “Little Ice Age” period (long before there were SUVs), so it’s no surprise to have seen a warming trend over the last 100 years or so.  And several hundred years prior to that Little Ice Age, the planet was warm enough for the Vikings to colonize Greenland (now covered in ice) and grow vineyards there.

Global warming has also been observed on Mars and Jupiter and other planets in the solar system in recent years–planets where no SUVs, power plants or capitalists exist.  Yet somehow we are expected to believe that it’s evil capitalist consumption that’s causing global warming on earth?  Go pull my other leg now.

We really are overdue for telling Al Gore and his apostles to stuff it.  They’ve been shining us on with propaganda about climate change that doesn’t even pass the smell test.  And his buddies in congress and the White House itching to raise our electric bills 40% with a cap-and-trade global warming tax, there’s no time like the present for America to jump off this bandwagon.

It’s headed for an abyss and America doesn’t want to be on it when it goes over.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • MJ
    There has been massive debate among my friends on this. In 1975, we were warned about global cooling, In 2000 , We are warned about global warming... So does that mean by 2025, we will be at the Global cooling stage again?

    Many scientists are back and forth on this issue as technically we have no "Hard" data from the last 1,000 years that will satisfy their curiosity as most accurate forms of temperature measurement weren't taken until roughly the 16th century.

    Most of the real weather people I follow tend to beleive we are going thru a normal global warming trend, but that it's more part of the normal ebb and flow of the earth that earth's record keepers haven't been able to really become knowledgeable about until recently.

    However the past year has proven to many of my northern friends that the temperatures actually fell this year instead of went up for winter and are curious how Al Gore will respond to that.

    Also how he will respond to the carbon credits that will be traded just like the stock market.. allowing a few people to get rich off the commissions for selling.
  • Ralph
    What is going to be really interesting is when Al Gore and the global warming nutcases have to duck, hide, and run from their fake science. How such a bunch of dimwits got so much power I will never understand as long as I live.
  • DJ
    Excellent article. I've been talking about the effects of solar activity for years. Sadly, as seen in some comment sections, the 'Warmers' tend to resort to ad hominems, non sequiturs, etc. My favorite is: the debate is over, the science is settled. I beg to differ. The idea that mankind is the main driver behind global warming is egotistical at best and dishonest at worst.
  • Moranosmilf
    Don't like my comments. Must be ok to marry your brother or sister and kill doctors along with science.
  • We just don't have spare time to indulge spiteful idiots who don't take the time to educate themselves before shooting their ignorant mouths off and looking silly. We allow substantive debate or no debate at all.
  • Stuart
    Just last week we had a meeting at work where it was brought up that if this passes we will likely see dynamic changes in our utility bills. We are a manufacturer that uses MidAmerican in Iowa and the rates are fairly constant and low. They have done a great job using green (mainly wind) sources in the last 5 years, but those won't be taken into account in this latest bill. The other factor causing this is the fact that the carbon credits they will have to buy will be traded on the open market and high demand may skyrocket the prices directly impacting energy prices.
  • I agree with Brook's comment, but I fear that when the proverbial "stuff hits the fan" that the Dems will turn the issue into another incident for class warfare. They will try to make it a rich vs poor, white vs black issue: "If rich white folks would pay their fair share and quit polluting with their big cars, SUVs and homes, then there would be no need to tax the poor folks to help clean-up the environment."
  • Brook
    If you review the comments section of any article on climate change, the post are 9 to 1 against the idea of impending climate doom. The people aren't buying this at all, and when it comes down to actually voting for this bill, things are going to get ugly. The Democratic Party is going to destroy themselves if they pass cap and trade -- it's as simple as that.
  • I certainly hope you're right Brook. Americans have become so ignorant, and so many in our government have become hostile to the people they ostensibly serve, that I'm never quite sure what they may get away with.
blog comments powered by Disqus