The Arrogance of Obama

j0289625This is some real arrogance on the part of President Barack Obama.

From The Politico:

The bankers struggled to make themselves clear to the president of the United States.

Arrayed around a long mahogany table in the White House state dining room last week, the CEOs of the most powerful financial institutions in the world offered several explanations for paying high salaries to their employees — and, by extension, to themselves.

“These are complicated companies,” one CEO said. Offered another: “We’re competing for talent on an international market.”

But President Barack Obama wasn’t in a mood to hear them out. He stopped the conversation and offered a blunt reminder of the public’s reaction to such explanations. “Be careful how you make those statements, gentlemen. The public isn’t buying that.”

“My administration,” the president added, “is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.”

I’m not surprised these bank executives “struggled” to make themselves clear to Obama; his executive, free-market and real-world experience would barely fill a thimble on their little finger.

They were likely struggling to  pay the respect due to the office of the President of the United States when the man filling that office is either stunningly ignorant about the free market….or extremely hostile to it.

As for the pitchforks, that sounds a little like Marxist-talk.  You know, of the bourgeois rising up with their pitchforks in hand to overthrow their proletariat oppressors.

And another thing: is Obama implying that the people of the United States are barely being held back and are restrained from violence only by the Obama Administration?  Or is the Obama Administration one of the socialist elements in our country trying to stir up class envy against the legal and legitimate operations of a private business?

And is he implying that if they don’t dance to his satisfaction, he may step out of the way and allow the American people to pillage the banks?

Regardless, Obama is radically overextending himself here.  He’s starting to act more like that king he bowed to than an American president of a free nation.

It’s time American people and American business pushed its collective self away from the table of federal largess and told the socialists where they can stick their dictatorial attitude.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Steven Riley
    If you watch the video then read who these men are, then you will realize THEY are the ones who have received money from the govenment and are trying to unload their toxic assets on the government. Once they get in line for money, someone has to let them know that they now are under different rules. If you or I borrow money from a bank, that bank wants to know what and how you plan to spend that money. In other words you become accountable to them. These CEO's are now accountable to our government and cant continue there wasteful spending and absurd salaries and bonuses are a part of that especially when they are performing poorly. If YOU perform poorly, whats happens. Now if they choose not take gov't money then they are free to spend however they want and the market will decide their fate, but that isn't whats happening, so they have to be reigned in by the entity from which they are borrowing . In this case its the government. Do you trust them. The past tells us we shouldn't. The taxpayers are now helping pay their salaries, not their shareholders. It's a bad situation, but they are the ones who made the bad loans and knew it when they did it and are now wanting money. They need someone to be stern with them.
  • You are right that someone needs to be stern with them...and that sternness should be in telling them "No" to taxpayer-funded bailouts.

    The private institutions have not sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution (which grants no authority for such bailouts); government officials have sworn such an oath, and in so doing, should tell private industry: "You made your bed, now you have to sleep in it."

    The government should also quit meddling in the free market and dicating policy to it, i.e. mandates for lending institutions to make politically correct loans to people with dubious ability to repay.

    Obviously government meddling and incompetence helped make the sorry bed the private sector needs to sleep in...but throwing gas on a fire never helped put out the fire. Goverment needs to BACK OFF and quit meddling if things are ever going to get better.

    It's kinda hard to get any grownup behavior out of a group (i.e. the federal government) that is acting like petty children in the first place.
  • Steven Riley
    I agree. But once they were given the money, i was glad Obama was tough on them. The final decision to bail them out came from Congress and it was sickening. I would rather us go through a prolonged recession and let the market correct itself, even though our country would suffer. This quick fix isnt the answer. Quick fixes never are.
blog comments powered by Disqus