Obama Reverses US Position on UN Declaration on Homosexuality

By The Christian Post on March 21st, 2009

imagesbannerscp_120x1201Reprinted by permission of the Christian Post

By Jennifer Riley
Christian Post Reporter
Fri, Mar. 20 2009 03:58 PM EDT

The Obama administration announced this week its endorsement of the U.N. declaration decriminalizing homosexuality, a move former President George W. Bush had rejected.

State Department spokesman Robert Wood said Wednesday that the United States supports the U.N.’s statements on human rights, sexual orientation, and gender identity, according to Agence France-Presse.

“The United States is an outspoken defender of human rights and critic of human rights abuses around the world,” Wood told reporters.

UN flag

UN flag

“As such, we join with other supporters of this statement, and we will continue to remind countries of the importance of respecting the human rights of all people in all appropriate international fora,” he said.

The United States will join 66 other countries, including all the members of the European Union, in backing the U.N. statement. Other countries who have signed the document include Japan, Australia, Mexico, and dozens of other countries.

Previously, Bush had refused to sign the declaration explaining that he feared it would infringe upon the rights of states. Some states, for instance, allow landlords and certain employers to discriminate based on sexual orientation, according to The Associated Press.

However, Wood assured that the document would not impose any legal changes in the United States.

But World Congress of Families is concerned that the measure will pressure member states to recognize gay marriage and other special rights.

“Violence and harassment in all forms should be condemned, but this special rights measure is not needed by the United Nations,” said Larry Jacobs, managing director of World Congress of Families, in a statement Friday.

“The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) has already been signed by the nations of the world and is supposed to be used by the UN to protect the rights of all persons from conception to natural death. Will this special rights measure be used to push for homosexuals serving openly in the U.S. military?” Jacobs inquired. “Will it be interpreted as a mandate for gay adoption?”

Jacobs noted that the Vatican is also concerned about how the statements would be interpreted.

Under Bush, the United States was the only western country to not sign the declaration in December when it was presented at the U.N. General Assembly.

Among the U.N.’s 192 member countries, 70 of them outlaw homosexuality. Over 50 countries, including members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, oppose the declaration.

Copyright 2009 The Christian Post. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark

Categories: News
Tags: , ,

  • DCM
    Dakota Voice really needs to stop using the term "sexual orientation." The correct term is "sexual preference." "Orientation" goes along with the demonstrably false idea that homosexuality is inborn & unchangeable.
  • That's a good point, DCM. You should note, however, that this is a reprinted article.

    I also sometimes use the term "sexual orientation" in discussing this subject, though usually only when quoting or paraphrasing someone else. I prefer to refer to homosexual behavior as just that: a behavior. Because like adultery, bestiality, incest, drug use, gambling and pretty much any other inclination, it is a behavior that can be chosen or resisted.

    But you make a good point that is so often missed or obfuscated, it's worth making again.
  • DCM
    Ah, yes, I should have caught the "reprinted" part. Anyway, I hope your "choice" of words doesn't mean you think people choose to be gay, because I'd think you know better than that. Homosexuality is what's called a sexual addiction. People don't just decide to have those; they're result of something going seriously wrong in their lives. The "choice" involved is that they either convince themselves it's OK, or they decide to take the long, hard path of recovery.
  • Yes, homosexuals don't "choose" to have inclinations toward that behavior, any more than the substance abuser chooses to have inclinations toward that behavior.

    But you correctly pointed out that, as with all behaviors, homosexuals can make the choice not to engage in that behavior, and of tremendous help in that restraint is acknowledging that it is immoral and unhealthy.

    I once heard it put this way for any sin we embrace and begin to indulge habitually: you can't stop the birds from flying over your head, but you can stop them from building a nest in your hair.
blog comments powered by Disqus
« »