Institutions that Consciously Reflect a Moral Idea

John Quincy Adams

John Quincy Adams

American Minute from William J. Federer

President John Adams’ son, John Quincy Adams, was U.S. Minister to Russia.

In September 1811, John Quincy Adams wrote from St. Petersburg to his son, Charles: “My dear Son…You mentioned that you read to your aunt a chapter in the Bible…every evening. This information gave me real pleasure…”

John Quincy Adams continued: “So great is my veneration for the Bible, and so strong my belief, that when duly read and meditated on, it is of all books in the world, that which contributes most to make men good, wise, and happy-that the earlier my children begin to read it…the more lively and confident will be my hopes that they will prove useful citizens of their country.”

This correspondence was published after his death as Letters of John Quincy Adams to his son, on the Bible and its Teachings.

President John Quincy Adams’ grandson was Henry Adams, an American historian. From his unique perspective of being related to some of America’s founders, Henry Adams, who died MARCH 27, 1918, wrote in his 9-volume work, History of the United States: “The Pilgrims of Plymouth, the Puritans of Boston, the Quakers of Pennsylvania, all avowed a moral purpose, and began by making institutions that consciously reflected a moral idea.”

William J. Federer is a nationally recognized author, speaker, and president of Amerisearch, Inc, which is dedicated to researching our American heritage. The American Minute radio feature looks back at events in American history on the dates they occurred, is broadcast daily across the country and read by thousand on the internet.

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Steven Riley
    John Quicy Adams was a Unitarian and felt that spiritual growth was more important than any one specific religion. He embraced all religions as long as they advocated moral teachings.He was actually critcal of the Christianity of his day, but did believe the Bible had many excellent references to help guide one to a moral life. He was indeed glad his son was reading the Bible and thought it the best reference for morality, but did not suscribe to specifics such as the ressurection etc. He simply believed morality was the important thing, independant of a specific religion.
    Steven
  • You may be making the same mistake commonly made today by a number of people, in confusing criticism of certain church institutions and institutional Christianity with the religion and doctrines itself.

    Having been associated with and come out of the European system where either the church held sway over government or government held way over the church, many of the founders certainly had reason for suspicion of and criticism of many religious institutions. And there were problems in organized Christianity in America, too, as there are now. But most Christians chose to react to those problems with institutional Christianity the same way the did regarding hypocrites in the church: they decided they'd rather go to church with a few hypocrites than burn in Hell for eternity with all of them.

    Regardless, the vast majority of them were undoubtedly Christian in their faith and allegiance. I believe JQA is in that number.

    I recall reading that John Quincy Adams read up to 5 chapters of the Bible daily (in their original languages) and also prayed daily. He also said, "My hopes of a future life are all founded upon the Gospel of Christ."

    His diaries record attending numerous church services, many in Washington D.C. On February 2, 1806 he described an overflow service held in the Supreme Court Chamber (they were usually held in the House, but apparently there were too many people present for that service for them all to fit there). Imagine that: church in the U.S. House and U.S. Supreme Court; enough to make a secularist swallow his snuff, eh?

    In an oration delivered by JQA on July 4, 1837 he cited the prophecy of Isaiah regarding the coming of the Messiah, where Adams said in part: "It is generally admitted by Christians of all denominations, that the fulfillment of this prophecy commenced at the birth of the Redeemer, six hundred years after it was promulgated. That it did so commence was expressly affirmed by Jesus himself, who, on his appearance in his missionary character at Nazareth, we are told by the gospel of Luke, went into the synagogue on the Sabbath-day, and stood up to read. "

    History seems to indicate that JQA took a serious look at Unitarianism, considered it...and ultimately rejected it because it denies the divinity of Christ and His Gospel.

    There were certainly more outspoken Christians than JQA, but by today's standards, he just might be called a "Bible thumper" by some.
  • Steven Riley
    Great info Many thanks Steven
  • You're most welcome!
blog comments powered by Disqus