Full Rush Limbaugh Speech to CPAC

Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh gave a fiery speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) this weekend. He thumped hard the socialists running the country right now and called them out for what they are. 

Below is an excerpt from his speech, and below that video of his speech from Fox News in seven parts.

———————————
…President Obama is so busy trying to foment and create anger in a created atmosphere of crisis, he is so busy fueling the emotions of class envy that he’s forgotten it’s not his money that he’s spending. [Applause] In fact, the money he’s spending is not ours. He’s spending wealth that has yet to be created. And that is not sustainable. It will not work. This has been tried around the world. And every time it’s been tried, it’s a failed disaster. What’s the longest war in American history? Did somebody say the war on poverty? Smart group. War on poverty. The war on poverty essentially started in the ’30s as part of the New Deal, but it really ramped up in the ’60s with Lyndon Johnson, part of the Great Society war on poverty. We have transferred something like 10 trillion, maybe close to 11 trillion, from producers and earners to nonproducers and nonearners since 1965. Yet, as I listen to the Democratic Party campaign, why, America is still a soup kitchen, the poor is still poor and they have no hope and they’re poor for what reason? They’re poor because of us, because we don’t care, and because we’ve gotten rich by taking from them, that’s what kids in school are taught today. That’s what others have said to the media. You know why they’re poor, you know why they remain poor? Because their lives have been destroyed by the never-ending government hay that’s designed to help them, but it destroys ambition. It destroys the education they might get to learn to be self-fulfilling. [Applause]

And it breaks our heart. It breaks our heart. We lose track of numbers with all of the money, with all the money that’s been transferred, redistributed, with all the charitable giving in this country. Ladies and gentlemen, there ought not be any poverty except those who are genuinely ill equipped. But most of the people in poverty in this country are equipped for far much more. They’ve just been beaten down. They’re told don’t worry, we’ll take care of you. There’s nothing out there for you anyway; you’ll be discriminated against. Breaks our heart to see this. We can’t have a great country and a growing economy with more and more people being told they have a right, because of some injustice that’s been done to them or some discrimination, that they have a right to the earnings of others. And it’s gotten so out of hand now that what worries me is that this administration, the Barack Obama administration is actively seeking to expand the welfare state in this country because he wants to control it. George Will once asked Dr. Friedrich Von Hayek, tremendous classical economist, great man, 1975, George Will, Dr. Von Hayek, why is it that intellectuals, supposed smartest people in the room, why is it that intellectuals can look right out their windows, their own homes and cars and look at their universities and not see the bounties and the growth and the greatness of capitalism? And Von Hayek said: I’ve troubled over this for years and I’ve finally concluded that for intellectuals, pseudo-intellectuals, and all liberals, it’s about control. It’s not about raising revenue. You think Obama has any intention of paying for all this spending? Folks, if he had any intention of paying for it, he wouldn’t do 90% of it because we don’t have the money. [Applause]

They don’t care about paying for it. All that’s just words. All that’s just rhetoric paying for it because he knows you have to worry about paying for it. He knows we all have to be concerned — oh, except, wrong again. Except the words of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd who were given homes that everybody knew they could never pay for, and now Barney Frank and Chris Dodd, the architects along with Bill Clinton of the policy that gave us the whole sub-prime mortgage crisis, get to sit around and act as innocent spectators to investigate what went on when they largely had the biggest role in causing it. [Applause] Congressman Frank’s definition of affordable housing is you get a house you don’t have to pay for that everybody else in the neighborhood will pay for. Why? Because it’s unfair that some people can have a house and some people can’t. Geez, it’s just unfair. So here we have two systems. We have socialism, collectivism, Stalin, whatever you want to call it, versus capitalism. Admittedly over on the right side capitalism there will be unequal outcomes because we’re all different. And some of us care more and have more passion and we know what we want to do and others are still struggling for it. Some people are just going to work harder than others. Okay. You get what you work for. Those who have a genuine inability for whatever reason are taken care of. We’re compassionate people. On the left side when you get into this collectivism socialism stuff, these people on the left, the Democrats and liberals today claim that they are pained by the inequities and the inequalities in our society. And they believe that these inequities and inequalities descend from the selfishness and the greed of the achievers. And so they tell the people who are on different income quintiles, whatever lists, they say it’s not that you’re not working hard enough, you could have what they have, perhaps, if you applied it. They’re stealing it from you.

So what liberals do, and I say this again to the — another thing, I know people in the country are watching. I was watching a focus group after some event this week. Might have been after Obama’s State of the Union show. [Laughter] And they had — it was a typical, you know, Drive-By Media focus group. They round up losers — [Laughter] — who hear Obama speak and think that the next day their gas tanks are going to be filled up and get a new house and a new kitchen and a new car. And so this one guy said — oh, it was some guy responding to Bobby Jindal. Oh, by the way did you hear about Joe Biden? Joe Biden was mystified how Bobby Jindal got his shift off at 7-Eleven that night to make the speech. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Time out. Suspend speech for explanation. People watching at home. I’m glad this happened. Glad this happened. You think I just made a joke, an ethnic joke about Bobby Jindal, don’t you? I didn’t. I made a joke about the bigotry of the Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden. It was Joe Biden while walking through the train station he knows so well because he’s such a real guy, that he made a comment that you can’t go into a 7-Eleven without seeing some Indian guy behind the counter. They’re all over the place. Now, let a conservative say something like that and he’s brought up before John Conyers’ committee with Pat Leahy wanting at you next. Many people think I lose my place in these speeches because — by the way what time is it? We have plenty of time. We have to be out of here by — [Applause]

We have to be out of here by 6:00 — okay, depends on how you behave. I’ll decide as we go on. What liberalism Democrat, for those of you in the country, I really want you to believe this because it’s the truth. I’m not saying it just because I believe it. This is a core. I want the best country we can have. We want the most prosperous people. We want to be growing. We want to lead the world. We want everybody to come here legally. We want this country to be so damn great and we just cringe to watch it — basically capitalism be assaulted and our culture be reoriented to where the people that make it work are the enemy. That’s not the United States of America. The people that make this country work, the people who pay on their mortgages, the people getting up and going to work, striving in this recession to not participate in it, they’re not the enemy. They’re the people that hire you. They’re the people that are going to give you a job. They’re the people that are going to give you a raise, the people that need you to do work for them. [Applause]…

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Part 7

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • Gregg
    Christine, you are a loser. The Democrat party is the party of losers. Go there and get out of the way of the people who want to succeed in life.
  • Panskeptic
    If the Democrats are a party of losers, you better get used to them dominating political life in this country for the foreseeable future, while the Republicans sit around reading each other out of the party and waiting for Reagan to rise from his grave (which he won't). The Republican era is over - they're bankrupt, and bellicose, and without ideas, and Rush never did know what he was talking about on his best day.
  • Yes, it looks like our country will be run by a bunch of losers who have only discredited and anti-American ideas of socialism to offer.
  • Robert Haines
    Christine raises an EXCELLENT point that EVERY Conservative needs to understand...

    Conservatives have two choices: Create a new political party -or- fix the one that has abandoned Conservatism because the party is infested with meely-mouthed-Moderates. I believe that it will be far easier to reclaim the Republican party.

    That means that Conservatives should encourage "enlightened" folks like Christine to actually make a committed stand for "something", "anything" - even if its the Democrat Party. By doing so, her objectives as well as our own will be well served. She hurt's Conservatism FAR less as a Democrat than she does as a Republican. Let there be no doubt, Christine - Conservatives fully intend to take our party back. One way or the other, you would be wise to get out of the way. Stop threatening to leave, just do it.
  • Good point, Robert!
  • Christine Zacher
    If this is where the Republican party is heading more power to them....or not. Rush L. represents everything that is wrong with our society. I thought that the Grand Ol' Party was looking for something new. I'm tired of listening to the empty cry that is tied securely and dangerously to the past; If this is the best they can do, maybe I will finally commit to one party; it won't be Republican.
  • ...and yet you can't cite a single specific example of what you consider an "empty cry." Hmmm, can't be an oversight. This leads me to believe you'd probably call our founding documents "tired" and "obsolete." Well, you can hate him all you want, but Rush is right on target as usual. There is no need for your touchy feely radical "change" when every freedom you have, Christine, and every thing that has made this country great, has already been established through the proven blue print for success. Knee jerk reaction combined with ignorance leads to reinventing the wheel...yeah, we'd probably prefer it if you stayed in your own party anyway.
  • You obviously aren't interested in returning America to greatness, Christine. Limbaugh is one of the few public voices for the principles and values which created the most free and most prosperous nation in human history.

    If you prefer to align yourself with the socialists--whose ideology has proven over and over and over again around the world for decades to be an utter failure--that's your choice.

    Meanwhile the rest of us will be at work to restore America to Constitutionalism and the path for which this great nation was intended.
blog comments powered by Disqus