Theologian: Evolution and Christianity Impossible to Reconcile

imagesbannerscp_120x60Reprinted by permission of the Christian Post

By Katherine T. Phan
Christian Post Reporter
Sun, Feb. 15 2009 09:15 AM EST

A widely respected evangelical Christian theologian said that while some Christians try to reconcile evolution with their faith, Christianity and Darwinian evolution are incompatible.

“If you understand Christianity or even Theism – the belief of a sovereign creator God – and evolutionary theory in its dominant form , I find it impossible to reconcile the two,” Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, said on his radio program Thursday, the 200th birthday anniversary of Charles Darwin.

While the Bible doesn’t explain all the mechanisms God used to create the world, it gives believers many non-negotiables about what that creation is, who is behind it, and for what purpose it was created, said Mohler on “The Albert Mohler Program”.

The seminary head went on to explain how the “originating mechanism of creation” is where theism runs right into collision with where modern evolutionary theory is.

Whereas the Biblical account of creation accepts the role of a Creator, the theory of evolution “suggests that natural selection is indeed the mechanism and that it is entirely natural and in no case supernatural,” said the theologian.

“There is no way for God to intervene in the process and for it to remain natural,” he asserted.

Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr

Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr

Adding to the debate amid bicentenary celebrations of Darwin’s birth, the Vatican also weighed in on the topic of evolution but claimed that the theory of the late evolutionary biologist is compatible with Christianity.

Archbishop Gianfranco Ravasi, head of the Pontifical Council for Culture, said last week that the idea of evolution could be traced to St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, according to the Telegraph in London. Both theologians had observed that big fish eat smaller fish and that forms of life had been transformed slowly over time.

The Catholic Church accepts theistic evolution, which asserts that evolution occurred but was a process created and planned by God.

Although Mohler said he rejected evolution as a way to explain the origin of all things, he acknowledged that there are changes in animals that take place over time.

“No Conservative Christian should deny there is a process of change that is evident within the animal kingdom. And there is even a process of natural selection that appears at least to be natural,” he said, adding all one has to do is look at a herd of cattle to find evidence of adaptation and a competition of genes.

However, he firmly rejected theistic evolution.

“God was not merely fashioning the creation of what was already pre-existent, nor was He merely working with a process in order to guide it in some generalized way, nor was He waiting to see how it would turn out,” said Mohler.

“As Genesis indicates, He created the world in order that the world might be the theater of His glory for the demonstration of the Gospel of Christ and He created human beings as the only beings made in His image, as His covenant partner,” the Protestant theologian explained.

A Gallup poll released on Feb. 11 found that 200 years after Darwin most Americans still don’t believe in evolution, with only 4 out of 10 Americans saying they accepted the theory.

“I believe the reason why they cannot believe in evolution is because when they look in the mirror they cannot see an accident,” remarked Mohler.

Next month, the Vatican will include discussion of intelligent design in a conference marking the 150th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species,” according to an announcement Tuesday.

Intelligent design suggests that life is too complex to have developed through evolution alone, and that a higher power has had a hand in changes among species over time.

Copyright 2009 The Christian Post. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.     

Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.

  • Digg
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Bookmarks
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live Favorites
  • Technorati Favorites
  • NewsVine
  • Share/Bookmark
  • cinemaphile85
    Wouldn't it be great if Christian leaders like "Dr." Mohler encouraged people to think for themselves?
  • Wouldn't it be nice if people actually did, instead of following the pop-culture herd?
  • cinemaphile85
    Well, yeah, pop culture certainly does its share of mind-controlling, but that doesn't magically excuse organized religion for doing the same thing. I was just pointing out how sad it is that the church doesn't encourage free inquiry or skepticism. I guess it can't, really.
  • You're right, it doesn't.

    There are some within the Christian community that approach things that way. But there are plenty of us who do think pretty freely, even within Christendom.

    I've been questioning assumptions since I was a kid, and still do. As you and I have discussed before, I've seen enough of God's track record (both in the Bible and personally in my life) that he has a huge vault of credit built up with me regarding the things that are unproven or hard to understand.

    But I'm still open to new ideas and the refutation of some of the "urban myths" that exist within the Christian community--i.e. those that aren't based on solid Biblical teaching.
  • cinemaphile85
    I would venture that most, not some, within the Christian community do not approach their beliefs with skepticism, dissent, or independent thought. If they did, there wouldn't BE a community.
  • I can see why you might think that. There are some awfully closed-minded, herd-following people in both the Christian community and the secular community.

    But I would still beg to differ about the overall level of skepticism and "independent thought" within the Christian community. And I think the figures that Barna Research has found (a 9% Biblical worldview among people who call themselves born-again Christians) bears that out.

    In other words, 91% of people who call themselves born-again Christians are apparently skeptical about what the Bible teaches, and are "thinking independently" of what the Bible teaches.

    But among those like myself who are pursuing a Biblical worldview, most of us continually weigh new and varying truth-claims against the available evidence.
  • cinemaphile85
    I think I found the study you're referring to:

    http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUp...

    If I read this study correctly, it does not measure skepticism or free thought (which is what we're talking about), but rather the degree to which the surveyed Christians follow the rules of the Bible (which is not what we're talking about). Also, you are making biased conclusions about the remaining 91% of the surveyed group, conclusions that are not substantiated or even alluded to in the study.
  • Just when I think you and I might be able to have a pleasant conversation, that for once you might be able to transcend one-dimensional thought and actually perform some deductive reasoning, you go and disappoint me.

    The only other possible conclusions are that these 91% are ignorant or willfully stupid about the doctrine of the religion they claim loyalty to.

    Perhaps I have this chronic fault of assuming people will actually use the gray matter inside the skull that God gave them and not simply float through life as ignorant as a rock, or gouging their eyes out in a vain effort to escape the ramifications of the truth.
  • cinemaphile85
    I'm sorry you get so defensive when someone objectively examines your argument.
  • I get very tired of explaining the obvious to people...only to discover I've been explaining something to a fence post.
  • Do we fall from Grace? I believe we all fall from the Grace of the Father. I believe we fall as a test of our Faith and commitment to the Father. It took me a while to figure out why, and then it just clicks. I believe sometimes we forget what God the Father really is, all around us, just because we can not hear and see him as a physical being. This is where the evil part of science pokes its head out. I sit and watch as they themselves, argue about theories and things they can't themselves physically prove but yet they want us to take their word as Our Law, oh poor souls. This is wrong my friends, I once heard a scientist say they do not have to prove the Father doesn't exist, we have to prove He does. But I say wrong brothers, they have to try and prove he doesn't, Why because even with all Faith aside (not religion because that is made from error of man's heart, the Father gave us Faith) as a common thinking man it all comes to which came first the chicken or the egg Prove to me we came from a single celled organism, and the biggest con, evolution, yes we evolve as beings we get smarter and stronger etc. The same with animals, we adapt another gift from the Father. We did not come from apes, show me an evolved ape since the dawn of man that we know of also show me a talking bear? The Lord does not need to be proven; He shows us He exists with every sun rise.
  • I agree, Matthew. But, to those with a rebellious and obstinate heart there is no amount of evidence that will convince them. Only though the Holy Spirit can our eyes be opened to the truth. Paul tells us in Romans 1:19-20, "For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse."
blog comments powered by Disqus