Media Pastoral Double-Standard: Uncontroversial Controversy
From OneNewsNow comes word that media analyst Colleen Raezler from the Culture and Media Institute says the “mainstream” media has a blatant double-standard on two pastors invited to speak at President-Elect Barack Obama’s inauguration–evangelical Rick Warren and open homosexual V. Gene Robinson.
I know, you’re as shocked as I am that the media would be anything less than objective, and even more so that they would exhibit a Left-wing bias, but let’s take a closer look.
Raezler says while the “mainstream” media squawked about the ”controversial” pick of Rick Warren (who espouses the Biblical position that homosexuality is a sin), the “mainstream” media has been unable to discover any signs or indications that the invitation to the openly homosexual priest V. Gene Robinson is in any way “controversial” or remarkable.
Why would that be? Could it be that the “mainstream” media would like us regular knuckle-dragging Americans who lack their broad-gauged understanding to believe that–even though the Bible clearly condemns homosexual behavior in both the Old and New Testaments–it is Rick Warren who is off his rocker and not the homosexual bishop who lives in contradiction to everything God teaches about homosexuality?
Could it be that our “objective” media wants to not merely report facts but change opinions?
What an upside-down world we live in where supporting the moral, traditional, most-people-understand-this, been-that-way-for-thousands-of-years position is considered controversial.
Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.



