Senate Looks at Taxpayer-Funded Homosexual Benefits
Not only are homosexual activists and their “useful idiots” in congress working very hard to legitimize homosexual behavior, according to the Washington Post they want you to fork over your hard-earned tax dollars to pay for it.
The Post says Senator Joe Lieberman is sponsoring legislation to extend employee benefits to homosexual couples who work for the government (i.e. work for you):
“This legislation would provide employee benefit programs to the same-sex domestic partners of federal employees,” Lieberman said yesterday at a Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing. “They would be eligible to participate in health benefits, long-term care, family and medical leave, federal retirement benefits, and all other benefits for which married employees and their spouses are eligible.”
In other words, this legislation would authorize taxpayer funds to pay for the health care of couples who are not married and can never be married because they are of the same sex.
Not only will this boost the taxpayer bill for health care (homosexuals have much higher rates of AIDS, STDs, hepatitis, substance abuse, depression, anxiety, mental health issues, suicide and domestic violence), but will further lend an illegitimate air of normalcy to homosexual behavior.
Here’s another gem:
Opposite-sex partners are not included because they have the option to marry.
Homosexuals also have the option to marry; they simply choose not to find an opposite-sex partner which is required to constitute a marriage.
We must return Republicans to power in congress and keep them there in the White House. For all their failings, they are nowhere near as bad as Democrats.
Taxpayer subsidization of an immoral and unhealthy lifestyle is unconscionable.
Note: Reader comments are reviewed before publishing, and only salient comments that add to the topic will be published. Profanity is absolutely not allowed and will be summarily deleted. Spam, copied statements and other material not comprised of the reader’s own opinion will also be deleted.
