Menu

Articles

Columnist - Bob Ellis

Columnist - Carrie K. Hutchens

Columnist - Gordon Garnos

Columnist - John W. Whitehead

Columnist - Ken Korkow

Columnist - Paul Scates

Columnist - Raymond J. Keating

Movie Reviews

Events Calendar

Submit an Event

Guest Submissions

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Contact Us

RSS Feed

About Dakota Voice

EP (Authorized Users Only)


Categories

abortion (79)

abstinence (15)

anti-Americanism (22)

appeasement (6)

Articles (48)

Bible (21)

blogs (6)

Bob Ellis (4)

Bush (26)

Carrie K. Hutchens (9)

Christian Heritage (18)

Christianity (61)

church and state (46)

Clinton (19)

Constitution (7)

corruption (1)

courts (18)

creation science (22)

crime (36)

culture (9)

death penalty (13)

defense (46)

drugs (6)

economy (8)

education (57)

election (43)

energy (8)

ethics (11)

ethnic issues (7)

euthanasia (40)

evolution (28)

family (52)

feminism (5)

Founders (3)

global warming (91)

Gordon Garnos (9)

government (18)

guns (2)

hate crimes (7)

health care (53)

history (3)

homosexuality (66)

immigration (21)

Iraq (42)

Islam (10)

Jesus Coffin (6)

John W. Whitehead (3)

Ken Korkow (2)

legislature (18)

liberalism (49)

marriage (28)

media (24)

media bias (33)

Middle East (5)

Misc (16)

Op/Ed (42)

parenting (38)

Paul E. Scates (3)

politics (16)

polling (14)

Raymond J. Keating (4)

religion (29)

religious freedom (21)

Ronald Reagan (1)

Schiavo (14)

science (13)

sexuality (33)

smoking (5)

socialism (60)

stem cell research (10)

taxes (19)

terrorism (28)

trade (4)

worldview (1)


Resources

 

Declaration of Independence

United States Constitution

Federalist Papers

Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin

     - Voting Record

Senator John Thune

     - Voting Record

Senator Tim Johnson

     - Voting Record

South Dakota Constitution

South Dakota Statutes

South Dakota Legislature

Email Your Legislators

South Dakota Budget

South Dakota Minimum Wage Study

South Dakota Secretary of State

South Dakota State Website

FEC Campaign Contrib. Map

Open Secrets - South Dakota

South Dakota Hospital Pricing

 

 

 


Monday, December 17, 2007


 

Who Got the Des Moines Register Endorsement--Bill or Hillary?

 

By Carrie K. Hutchens

I just read that the Des Moines Register endorsed Hillary Clinton, but it looks more like they had to be courted into doing so, rather than coming to the decision for good cause. As reported in "Hillary Clinton gets crucial boost," (The Times, December 17, 2007)  "Hillary Clinton received a badly needed boost to her presidential campaign yesterday with the endorsement of Iowa's biggest newspaper, a vote of confidence that followed days of lobbying by her husband."

Does this mean that every time Hillary messes up, especially where diplomacy is needed, that Bill will come running to the rescue? If Hillary can't run her campaign without Bill, how can she run the country without him?

On the one hand, we are told how capable Hillary is to handle the position of president, only to have the other hand slap us up side the face with reality. When things don't go her way, it starts getting dirty, but though she claims she is in charge of her campaign, she never seems to know of the negative acts until after-the-fact. (Her claim -- not mine.) Then someone resigns. Is this how her presidency would also run? After all, if she can't handle a campaign staff with a single agenda -- how can she possibly handle the white house staff and all the complexities that go along with running the country?

The Times piece also states, "The newspaper said that Mr Obama 'inspired our imagination. But it was Clinton who inspired our confidence.' Which Clinton? Hillary or Bill? It was Bill, after all, that won them over.

The Des Moines Register may have endorsed Hillary Clinton, but not without giving a good word about Obama and not without Bill Clinton arguing for her behind closed doors and apparently with follow-up telephone calls. So what does she have to be excited about? She didn't get the endorsement. It was gotten for her by her ex-president husband. Just how much else has gone her way "simply" because of who she is married to or by his direct efforts? Would anyone have looked twice at her as a potential candidate if it weren't for her husband and the possibility this would be "the" advertising gimmick to win back the White House?

There was a time when a newspaper endorsement carried great influence in an election, but that is not necessarily the case any longer. But if it were the case, even in a single incident where a publication was so trusted as to be the ultimate influencing factor in an election, how could anyone take seriously an endorsement that wasn't readily given because the candidate, him/herself, was so impressive as to draw the confidence alone, and without a closed door meeting with the ex-president who is wishing to be the First-Man of the White House?

Hillary Clinton may be smiling today and feeling all pumped up over the newspaper endorsement, but she might want to consider also that it is actually her husband's endorsement, since he apparently got it for her. Even more importantly -- she might want to think about the fact many, many people (voters) know that, too! This is, after all, the computer age where information spreads like wildfire and can't so easily be controlled by any one source and definitely not by Hillary's camp.

Again, the article says, "The newspaper said that Mr Obama 'inspired our imagination. But it was Clinton who inspired our confidence.'"

"Mr." Obama and simply Clinton. So the question remains -- we know which Clinton inspired the endorsement, which one inspired the confidence? Mr. or Mrs.?

 

Carrie Hutchens is a former law enforcement officer and a freelance writer who is active in fighting against the death culture movement and the injustices within the judicial and law enforcement systems.

 

Leave a comment about this article

 


 




Recommended Articles

 


Recommended Op/Eds


Recommended Blog Posts