Menu

Articles

Columnist - Bob Ellis

Columnist - Carrie K. Hutchens

Columnist - Gordon Garnos

Columnist - John W. Whitehead

Columnist - Ken Korkow

Columnist - Paul Scates

Columnist - Raymond J. Keating

Movie Reviews

Events Calendar

Submit an Event

Guest Submissions

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Contact Us

RSS Feed

About Dakota Voice

EP (Authorized Users Only)


Categories

abortion (79)

abstinence (15)

anti-Americanism (22)

appeasement (6)

Articles (48)

Bible (21)

blogs (6)

Bob Ellis (4)

Bush (26)

Carrie K. Hutchens (9)

Christian Heritage (18)

Christianity (61)

church and state (46)

Clinton (19)

Constitution (7)

corruption (1)

courts (18)

creation science (22)

crime (36)

culture (9)

death penalty (13)

defense (46)

drugs (6)

economy (8)

education (57)

election (43)

energy (8)

ethics (11)

ethnic issues (7)

euthanasia (40)

evolution (28)

family (52)

feminism (5)

Founders (3)

global warming (91)

Gordon Garnos (9)

government (18)

guns (2)

hate crimes (7)

health care (53)

history (3)

homosexuality (66)

immigration (21)

Iraq (42)

Islam (10)

Jesus Coffin (6)

John W. Whitehead (3)

Ken Korkow (2)

legislature (18)

liberalism (49)

marriage (28)

media (24)

media bias (33)

Middle East (5)

Misc (16)

Op/Ed (42)

parenting (38)

Paul E. Scates (3)

politics (16)

polling (14)

Raymond J. Keating (4)

religion (29)

religious freedom (21)

Ronald Reagan (1)

Schiavo (14)

science (13)

sexuality (33)

smoking (5)

socialism (60)

stem cell research (10)

taxes (19)

terrorism (28)

trade (4)

worldview (1)


Resources

 

Declaration of Independence

United States Constitution

Federalist Papers

Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin

     - Voting Record

Senator John Thune

     - Voting Record

Senator Tim Johnson

     - Voting Record

South Dakota Constitution

South Dakota Statutes

South Dakota Legislature

Email Your Legislators

South Dakota Budget

South Dakota Minimum Wage Study

South Dakota Secretary of State

South Dakota State Website

FEC Campaign Contrib. Map

Open Secrets - South Dakota

South Dakota Hospital Pricing

 

 

 


Monday, September 24, 2007


Should schools be closed for low attendance or economic factors?

 

By Gordon Garnos

AT ISSUE: Members of the South Dakota Legislature are expected next year to open the door again for more school consolidations. A task force recommended that schools with less than 200 students should be forced to consolidate with another school or close its doors. The Legislature bounced this around quite a bit, but finally settled on the magic number of 100 students are needed to keep a school open. Prior to this legislation, a school's future was primarily based on economic factors, whether or not a school district could get a tax limit opt out passed by the voters.

CALL IT WHAT you want, school consolidation or a "kinder" word, "reorganization," is going to take place in South Dakota for a long time, a former legislator recently said. There are legislators now saying the minimum number of students for a school in the state may be raised from 100 to 300. While this may be no big deal for the larger towns in South Dakota, many people look at this proposal as being catastrophic for the people and communities where such reorganization would be mandated by state law.

According to the law passed in the 2007 session of the Legislature that mandates schools of less than 100 students would either have to close or merge with another district. The following nine schools will have to either close or consolidate with another school district within two years: Carthage, Conde, Greater Scott (mailing address, Akron, Iowa), Greater Hoyt (mailing address, Hawarden, Iowa), Harrold, Northwest, Pollock, Polo and Wood.

THEN, IF THAT magic number is only increased to, say, 125 or 150 students, 12 more schools in the state will be forced to close their doors. They are Big Stone City, Bonesteel-Fairfax (already consolidated once), Bowdle, Edmunds Central, Herreid, Oelichs, Oldham-Ramona (already consolidated), Roslyn, Rutland, South Shore, Stickney and Summit.

If this minimum number of students for a school district is raised to 200 or the rumored 300 by legislative mandate that list is going to at least double in size.

Tax cap opt-outs for several school districts have saved their schools, at least for the short term. However, successful opt-outs can also eventually break a school district.

IS THERE NO ANSWER to all of this? Oh, there are answers alright, but answers that don't bid well with a lot of the populations of these communities. I don't know how many times I have heard that the closing of a school is the death of the community. In a lot of ways that is tragically true. However, I am reminded of a wise old professor who once told me the education of children in a community is more important than the community itself.

One could argue that point until hell freezes over and the only conclusions to that argument would be determined by what side of the fence you were on.

Whenever the subject of school reorganization rears its head, I am taken back to the legislative mandate back in the 1960s. All common, or country, schools in the state had to merge with an independent school district, one with a high school. And it was up to the county school boards to get the job done. The ink had hardly dried on that piece of legislation when all hell broke out. I know. I was on one of those county school boards.

Before that mandate was issued the most controversial issue we had was when to set the date for rally day. Wow! When that bomb dropped rally days became rather secondary.

CODINGTON COUNTY had five independent school districts with dozens of country schools. Those dozens of country schools had to be pushed into one of the five districts. It was an almost impossible task as families very often related to another community than what was the closest town to their farms. In many cases it pitted family member against family member. Of course these high schools were very competitive in sports and even the idea of merging high schools was a dirty, dirty notion and talking about high schools or country schools merging could easily lead to a fight.

An example of this: About this time of reorganization, the entire school at Summit burned to the ground. The communities of South Shore and Waverly were not many miles away. Guess what happened. The Codington County School Board had the audacity and the tenacity to suggest these three schools merge into one. The logic was there. With all the farm land within these school district boundaries, finances would not be a problem. In fact, such a school would be rolling in clover, so to speak.

Well, to make a long story very short, members of the county school board were actually threatened by folks from these three communities. Only two of us are still alive and that might be doubtful today if we stopped in a couple of those towns for any length of time.

IS THERE A MESSAGE here? Yes. Any school reorganizing still to be done has to come from Pierre. So, know your legislators very well before you send them out there....

 

Gordon Garnos was long-time editor of the Watertown Public Opinion and recently retired after 39 years with that newspaper.  Garnos, a lifelong resident of South Dakota except for his military service in the U.S. Air Force, was born and raised in Presho.

 

Leave a comment about this article

 

 


 




Recommended Articles

 


Recommended Op/Eds


Recommended Blog Posts